<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for johnheaven</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/johnheaven/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/johnheaven/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:16:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Connected doesn&amp;#8217;t always mean digitally connected</title><link>http://ash10.com/2009/09/connected-doesnt-always-mean-digitally-connected/#comment-17644637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that it is important to be connected, and how you achieve that is not important. However, I think that this doesn't really help solve the social inclusion/digital inclusion problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As you rightly say, some people prefer to connect conventionally whereas others prefer to connect more digitally. I think there is probably a spectrum from those who are completely offline and do everything the old-fashioned way, to those who do everything online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's fine, so long as you have the opportunity to be as digital as you like. The point about digital/social inclusion is that lots of people don't have the choice, so they are by default at one end of the spectrum whether they like it or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's another point, which is that by learning how to connect with friends digitally you also learn generic computer skills (well, I assume you do -- I don't actually know this for certain, but wouldn't be surprised). If you know how to access email, upload photos to Flickr, or run a blog, you're probably more likely to benefit from online banking, price comparison sites and all the rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So there's a lot to be said for digital!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Heaven</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>