<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for johneeboy3</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/johneeboy3/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/johneeboy3/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:18:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
Next swing support zone SPX 1860-1880
</title><link>http://www.xtrenders.com/2016/02/next-swing-support-zone-spx-1860-1880.html#comment-2533292059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! A blast from the past. &lt;br&gt;Hello! &lt;br&gt;Would I be welcome here?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2226907700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there @sNAMu. Have been quietly lurking for a while but would be grateful if I could be included? Perhaps you remember me from the past? If not, I can provide references that I'm not a serial-killer or anything ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2225563487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@uidezine Perhaps you misunderstood my (clearly unsuccessful) attempt to make a joke about the double meaning of the word "black list"? Arak and MLMT understood it. I thought I was being clear enough that it was a joke. I'm sorry if it confused you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2225442889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@uidezine I got your invite and was able to access the blog yesterday. I added myself as a member on the RHS of the page as you requested. For some reason today I could not access it any more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2225440857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@uidezine&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2224187159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm I didn't realise this blog was so racist ;-)&lt;br&gt;But I guess that means I'm on the white list.... :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2224024998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks @MLMT&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings, everyone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UI Dezine Diary: Secret Revealed</title><link>http://uidezine.blogspot.com/2015/08/secret-revealed.html#comment-2223860401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@uidezine Greetings! I was wondering if you could give me permission to participate on your blog? I'm a long-time friend of MLMT and Arak.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do All Good Things Come To An End</title><link>http://tacharts101.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-end.html#comment-63691999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't even realise you were subscribed to my google group!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All the best, Josh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do All Good Things Come To An End</title><link>http://tacharts101.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-do-all-good-things-come-to-end.html#comment-63649905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Farewell, Josh. I've always enjoying discussing the market with you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Postler: Elementary’s new mail client</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/07/postler-elementary%e2%80%99s-new-mail-client/#comment-63099983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an awesome idea that I hope will capture the obvious target market -- non-nerds. As a technophile myself, I won't likely be using it, but it's a much needed breath of fresh air for the less technically inclined. Great idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:06:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye, For Now, While Seeking New Opportunities | Market Indices | Technical Analysis</title><link>http://portfoliotilt.com/Technical-Analysis/Market-Indices/goodbye-for-now-while-seeking-new-opportunities.html#comment-32711487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Best wishes for the future, Drew.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elliott Wave Update ~ 4 February</title><link>http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.com/2010/02/elliott-wave-update-4-february.html#comment-32680709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good work, Daneric. I appreciate the time it takes to draw charts and write commentary. Agree that we are in a third wave. Watch out below!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Be Vewy Vewy Careful</title><link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13766#comment-26919925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that's good work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Be Vewy Vewy Careful</title><link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13766#comment-26859249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ladies and gents,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why am I reading these alarm bells everywhere around the blogosphere about this supposed 'decoupling' of the currencies from the equity indexes?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course they 'could' be decoupling, but I highly doubt it. Why? Cos The main driver of the coupling is still there, bigger 'un badder than ever - debt and leverage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure that EUR vs SPX overlay chart is one way of looking at it.... and freaking yourself out.... but before you soil your jeans, please bring up a 5 year weekly chart of any of these pairs and have a good look:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SPX with inverse DXY overlaid&lt;br&gt;SPX with EUR/USD overlaid&lt;br&gt;SPX with Gold overlaid&lt;br&gt;Gold with DXY overlaid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What you will see is that major tops and bottoms can be out of sync by weeks (sometimes months), but the longer term strong correlation REMAINS INTACT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In short, we must give these correlations more time to prove or disprove themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, and the fact that DXY's first leg up is extending beyond the historical statistical norms simply screams at me that this is the real deal and that the bottom that DXY recently printed was a major turning point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember back in the crash of 08-09 when the SPX and DOW busted all historical retracement levels? Ring any bells?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chillax, crew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LMAO!  This is Grand!</title><link>http://mrlinvestments.blogspot.com/2009/12/lmao-this-is-grand.html#comment-26013863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Appalled, but not surprised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I share your sentiments, Mr L.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Price should remain</title><link>http://tacharts101.blogspot.com/2009/12/price-should-remain.html#comment-25815558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Josh!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Slow me only just realised you have your own blog!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll keep a closer eye on it in future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take care&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McClellan's and SPX Hourly</title><link>http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.com/2009/10/mcclellans-and-spx-hourly.html#comment-21146795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're welcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for taking the time to analyse and count all those wiggles. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:47:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McClellan's and SPX Hourly</title><link>http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.com/2009/10/mcclellans-and-spx-hourly.html#comment-21146412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daneric,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Long time lurker. Thanks for taking the time to post your charts so consistently.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK... so here's my meagre attempt to 'give back' a little. Seeing as you were discussing the McClellan Oscillator. The pre-market commentary from  from &lt;a href="http://sentimentrader.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sentimentrader.com"&gt;sentimentrader.com&lt;/a&gt; (subscription required, and recommended) discussed a rare configuration in the MCO. A few excerpts from that commentary that I think will add value to your analysis:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BEGIN QUOTE:&lt;br&gt; Remarkably, the Oscillator hit a deeply oversold reading yesterday, nearly 2 standard deviations below its 70-year average.  At a current level of -73, the Oscillator is giving off one of its most oversold readings since the March bottom...even though the S&amp;amp;P was within 1% of a new 52-week high at one point during the session.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Since 1940, this has never happened before.  The S&amp;amp;P was never within 1% of a new yearly high on the same day the Oscillator dipped to -70 or below.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we relax those parameters a bit and look for times the S&amp;amp;P was within 2% of a high, then a few precedents pop up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...[snip graphic and table of performance results X months after the signal]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The S&amp;amp;P held up OK a few times over the shorter-term of a few weeks, but by two months later it was sporting a negative return every time but once.  Ditto for three months out.  The best-case instance from June 2003 led to a trading range that lasted about two months, with the market really going nowhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When we combine this with a few other studies we've looked at recently (like the spike in buying climaxes last week, the big reversal day, and the volatile breadth readings), we're seeing some toppy kind of behavior.  None of them conclusively stated that the top is in and 1100 is to October as 666 was to March, but we're seeing more and more odd readings that we haven't seen during the rally so far.&lt;br&gt;END QUOTE&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So... in summary... the SPX has *never* had such a low MCO reading whilst trading within 1% of a 52 week high, and in basically all cases the return after a month or more is negative (that is, the SPX declined substantially).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting, IMV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:38:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Red days in a row.. now what??</title><link>http://eminitrends.blogspot.com/2009/09/two-red-days-in-row-now-what.html#comment-17349975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice charts, Waffle. You've come a long way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although I think your targets will be exceeded by a wide margin when the breakout is fully confirmed. Your targets are just the beginning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:10:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: All Coiled Up</title><link>http://slopeofhope.com/2009/09/all-coiled-up.html#comment-17153435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good work, Kemal. Thanks for posting your thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commitment of Traders 09/15/2009</title><link>http://lcmarket.blogspot.com/2009/09/commitment-of-traders-09152009.html#comment-17000629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very well said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $BPSXP, Apple and the Dollar Fractal</title><link>http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.com/2009/09/dollar-fractal-and-apple-bpspx.html#comment-16798426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good work, yet again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That AAPL chart is a doozy. Agree, it has exhaustion written all over it. It'll be interesting to watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exhaustion Gaps</title><link>http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.com/2009/09/exhaustion-gaps.html#comment-16786186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Dan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Market is a Fractal – Sept. 15</title><link>http://patmcneill.blogspot.com/2009/09/market-is-fractal-sept-15.html#comment-16692313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm flattered... but I certainly don't feel like one and I'm not sure I have the same level of dedication as you to pick away at it down to the micro level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope there aren't too many waves within waves in January 2010, as Mrs Beach and I are booked for a torrid and vigorous surfing affair on the South NSW coast. I want smooth, clean, predictable waves. Some of those in the markets would be a welcome change too. LOL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm tipping that (just my luck) January 2010 will mark W3 of 3 of 3 of 3 of 3 to the downside and I'll miss most of the ride.... But if there's magnificent clean surf then I may not care!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johneeboy3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>