<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for johncapello</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/johncapello/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/johncapello/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:02:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: There are tech companies and then there are tech companies</title><link>http://theonda.org/articles/2009/05/15/there-are-tech-companies-and-then-there-are-tech-companies#comment-9405867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually think this is a great statistic -- it measures the capital efficiency of the thinking machines employed by a firm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you missed out on the really interesting examples (albeit from the pre-recession world -- &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9d9624a4-8341-11dd-907e-000077b07658.html):" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9d9624a4-8341-11dd-907e-000077b07658.html):"&gt;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9...&lt;/a&gt; Goldman at $1.24MM/employee and Nintendo(?!) at $1.6&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johncapello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>