<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for joepeterson</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/joepeterson/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/joepeterson/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:59:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Merrill Retention Is Adequate for Top Dogs, Scanty for Lower-Tier Producers</title><link>http://registeredrep.com/advisorland/career/merrill_retention_bank_of_america_1024/#comment-3305576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this retention package is an insult to anyone who has ever given thier loyalty to Merrill.Screwing the brokers on the vesting of thier deferred stock.Now they offer one fourth of what JPM offers thier guys.Give me one reason to stay.Mccan is either a guttless worm for not backing us or just a worm&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joepeterson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>