<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for joekwon</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/joekwon/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/joekwon/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:36:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GPS Navigation: Bike Touring or Cycling With A Smartphone</title><link>https://www.cyclingabout.com/gps-navigation-bike-touring-or-cycling-with-a-smartphone/#comment-2276725507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review, well done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Common Mistakes in Logo Design</title><link>http://www.sitepoint.com/6-common-mistakes-logo-design/#comment-1248943638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;99% Invisible did a story on the controversy of the "new" logo. It describes that the new monogram was in fact NOT a redesign of the seal. &lt;a href="http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/episode-69-the-brief-and-tumultuous-life-of-the-new-uc/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/episode-69-the-brief-and-tumultuous-life-of-the-new-uc/"&gt;http://99percentinvisible.o...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The context of the article above is misleading as the logo was not a replacement as Jollins correctly points out. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Jobs Blinks! Apple Backs Down on App Subscription Rules.</title><link>http://allthingsd.com/20110609/steve-jobs-blinks-apple-backs-down-on-app-subscription-rules/#comment-222410998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The headline for this article is unbelievably sensationalist. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s next?</title><link>http://oneweekapp.com/log/whats-next/#comment-34726667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm 30 years old and you're my hero! Seriously I've been trying to teach myself Objective-C on and off for the last year. I'm simultaneously amazed by your talent and ashamed that I've only made a "Hello World" app.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Stylus</title><link>http://joekwon.com/blog/2008/08/iphone-stylus/#comment-20202510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I wasn't expecting a comment on such an old blog post. But yes, the stylus was an epic failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However since then I now have a 3Gs that I use without a screen protector. I should bust out the pen stylus again to see if it was indeed the screen protector.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/08/iphone-call-recording-it-makes-too-much.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/08/iphone-call-recording-it-makes-too-much.html#comment-14575865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would love this feature. However, with AT&amp;amp;T dropping all my calls, it would be near useless on the iPhone in the US.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jobox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>