<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jmeth</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jmeth/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jmeth/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:11:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How To Go Broke In The Stock Market Illustrated With A Simple Drawing</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/how-to-go-broke-in-the-stock-market/#comment-2916135912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The chart depicts a unique situation: a horizontal channel.  However, the market (and individual stocks) don't usually move laterally for long (except in secular bear markets); they usually trend up or down for extended periods.  In horizontal markets you might be able to "buy the valleys and sell the hills" but in trending markets you never know really know when you hit the bottom of the valley or the top of the hill until after you begin seeing the reversal on the other side.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd much rather buy on confirmations of the trend - after a new high or low is made; that is when a new hilltop is higher than the previous hilltop or sell when a new valley bottom is lower than a previous valley bottom.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is The Bull Market Topping? What The Moving Averages Are Saying</title><link>https://www.seeitmarket.com/is-the-bull-market-topping-what-the-moving-averages-are-saying-14579/#comment-2153005147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent analysis and I endorse everything.  These are the indicators I have used for my market timing since 2007 and they have been extremely reliable.  Specifically, you point out that the 50-dma under the 100-dma alone is insufficient; it must be confirmed by a 50- under 200-dma, negatively sloping moving averages or the the Index crossing under the 300-dma.  These conditions indicate a true bear market, sufficiently certain to justify an aggressive market short (or 100% cash) position.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s behind the Swiss franc&amp;#039;s surge: Pro</title><link>http://www.cnbc.com/id/102340278#comment-1793914460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gartman, hope you own gold and other commodities that break your toes when you drop them in Swiss Francs ...... and not $US&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boston Scientific Faces Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/32831/boston-scientific-faces-lawsuit#comment-1419186272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While it offers a 10+% dividend yield, CMO has crossed above 17 since 1997! What could make it advance higher now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Concepts of Internal Trendlines</title><link>http://www.investoo.com/the-concepts-of-internal-trendlines/#comment-1068838315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trendlines essentially are attempts to locate the areas, or zones, where control shifts between demand and supply. Those shifts are most visible in horizontal trendlines (i.e., one particular price).  Even then, the shifts aren't precise but approximations.  The shifts are less obvious and precise when they occur at ever higher or lower prices (i.e., ascending or descending trendlines). The important point to remember is that this pivots aren't precise but occur over a number of transactions at perhaps different prices.  Consequently, I concur. It's important to search out "internal trendlines" as well as "conventional" trendlines.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U.S. stock indexes at critical short-term juncture</title><link>http://peterlbrandt.com/u-s-stock-indexes-at-critical-short-term-juncture/#comment-917502831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you were to use a logarithmic scale on the first S&amp;amp;P chart, you would see that the Index stays exactly within the channel and there wouldn't be any blow off discussion; this could be a correction back to the lower channel boundary at around 1605 the same as Dec 2012, Feb and April.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gold’s Support Seen at $1,400 Channel Base: Technical Analysis</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-15/gold-s-support-seen-at-1-400-channel-base-technical-analysis.html#comment-864766711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what I thought until today when GLD crashed below 140 to a low of 130.51 before recovering a tad.  Was it over-reacting?  Probably ... hopefully because I went in and bought some GLD remaining a staunch believer that the channel is a long-term correction in essentially a very long-term bull-market.  I can't go anywhere but up with inflation on the horizon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Absence of Formal Technical Analysis Education</title><link>https://dev.philpearlman.com/2013/01/20/on-the-absence-of-formal-technical-analysis-education/#comment-774012428</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Check out my recently published book "Run with the Herd".  I think it will put technical analysis into a new market timing, trend trading framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Absence of Formal Technical Analysis Education</title><link>https://dev.philpearlman.com/2013/01/20/on-the-absence-of-formal-technical-analysis-education/#comment-774003045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Part of the problem faced by Technical Analysis is its image as a "predictive" tool.  In my book "Run with the Herd", I emphasize that technical tools, especially charts, work best when used to indicate appropriate buy/sell points as prices move out of consolidations or reversals.  Their use is inappropriate and inadequate in determining the expected length and/or duration of the subsequent trends (we leave that to the practitioners of Fibonacci numbers).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bull Market Returns Almost Entirely Dependent on Duration</title><link>http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2013/01/19/bull-market-returns-almost-entirely-dependent-on-duration/#comment-772949651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The conclusions in this report seem to be circular but interesting.  It concludes that bull markets remain bull markets until a bear market comes along (decline of 20% or more) and they are no longer bull markets. The most important thing for success in the stock market is to know when a bear market has arrived and then moving some or all into cash: stay invested until a bear market comes along and&lt;br&gt;then run for the hills.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AAPL Gets a Cold, the Market Gets &amp;#8230;..?</title><link>http://stock-chartist.com/2012/11/aapl-gets-a-cold-the-market-gets/#comment-722725784</link><description>&lt;p&gt; If that is going to be a head-and-shoulders formation then a right shoulder is needed.  See my subsequent post &lt;br&gt;Head-and-Shoulders Patterns: AAPL and GLD Case Studies&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has the bear market begun?</title><link>http://www.ibtimes.com/has-bear-market-begun-852935#comment-696175185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I concur.  A 20-period moving average of a monthly bar chart = approximately a 400-day moving average.  I prefer a combination of 50-, 100-, 200- and 300-dma's and arrive at the same conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dow 55,000? It's Closer Than You Think</title><link>http://www.thestreet.com/story/11746739/1/dow-55000-its-closer-than-you-think.html#comment-691285770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure I would go all the way to 55,000 but the last chapter of my book, Run with the Herd, was entitled "Where to from here?" and explains why I believe that the market (S&amp;amp; 500) will hit 3000 by 2010, or 30,000 in the Dow-30. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Do Friday&amp;39s Losses Mean?</title><link>http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/85177/what-does-fridays-losses-mean#comment-689108841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote to my members that it is 3 and 4 in your list&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resuscitating The Near Dormant Dow Theory</title><link>http://stock-chartist.com/2012/06/resuscitating-the-near-dormant-dow-theory/#comment-564165566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know who you're referring to and you have no idea of how many cycles I've actually experienced.  Trust me,  it's many more than you suspect. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Market Could Soon Bottom (And Nobody Knows It)</title><link>http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/market-correction-technical-analysis-fibonacci-retracement/1/30/2012/id/39113#comment-424906039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only was the wrong article posted (it was from Oct, 2011) but the conclusion turned out to be ass-backwards.  The market is actually up 19.45% from Oct. 3, 2011 rather than having declined to 1050 area as predicted by the author.  So much for his investment advice!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kass: 15 Surprises for 2012 - TheStreet</title><link>http://www.thestreet.com/story/11357403/5/kass-15-surprises-for-2012.html#comment-395137210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fascinating. A title about 2012 and text exclusively about 2011.  Some would call that "bait and switch" ... at least that's what it felt like to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://dragonflycap.com/2011/04/04/macro-play-of-the-week-gold-vs-crude-oil/</title><link>http://dragonflycap.com/2011/04/04/macro-play-of-the-week-gold-vs-crude-oil/#comment-178489770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is similar to what I recently wrote (&lt;a href="http://stockchartist.blogspot.com/2011/03/gold-value-of-commodities.html)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stockchartist.blogspot.com/2011/03/gold-value-of-commodities.html)"&gt;http://stockchartist.blogsp...&lt;/a&gt; concerning the relationship between GLD and DBC, the etf on a basket of commodities.  I stated "With all the discussion about food shortages and increased demand for oil and other demand for commodities, the price of commodities hasn't been reflected in their prices when expressed in terms of the gold."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:42:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://quinttatro.com/2011/02/17/trend-trading/</title><link>http://quinttatro.com/2011/02/17/trend-trading/#comment-151243112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where have you been since 1999 Quint? Over the long-term, the market has been trading laterally since the Tech Bubble bust; in the short-term, the market traded laterally for 14 months until this bull run began with the announcement of QE2 in August.  Haven't you heard that we're in a "secular bear market" that will last the typical 14-18 years?  If and when the S&amp;amp;P 500 crosses it's all-time high at 1576 will a true new trend begin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Golden Swans: 6 Themes that May Spur the Next Bull Market    Investing With Options</title><link>http://www.investingwithoptions.com/2010/11/17/golden-swans-6-themes-that-may-spur-the-next-bull-marke/#comment-98790195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent answer to a question I asked myself back in August in a piece entitled ""Becoming A 'Go-Ahead' Nation ... Again"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:27:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bears Beware!    Chart.ly Blog</title><link>http://blog.chart.ly/bears-beware/#comment-95969337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't agree with you more.  My take on it is spelled out in &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://stockchartist.blogspot.com/2010/11/regaining-our-bearings.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stockchartist.blogspot.com/2010/11/regaining-our-bearings.html"&gt;http://stockchartist.blogsp...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Locking in Gains    Joe Fahmy</title><link>http://joefahmy.com/2010/10/28/locking-in-gains/#comment-91501728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about: JBLU, RL, CYBX, CNQR, NTES, PETM, IDCC ..... and I could go on with many more.  This enough?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Locking in Gains    Joe Fahmy</title><link>http://joefahmy.com/2010/10/28/locking-in-gains/#comment-91465113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't believe you say "lack of quality bases".  I don't have enough money to take advantage of all these great base patterns and breakouts. My indicators point to the fact that bullish momentum is in control.  Now is the time to add great momentum stocks in your portfolio for a huge bull market next year. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Foreclosure-Gate Spur More Modifications? - Daniel Indiviglio - Business - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/10/should-foreclosure-gate-spur-more-modifications/64594/#comment-87252581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been making the same argument to my liberal friends but not as cogent and succinctly as you.  Thanks for writing this and taking the side of common sense rather than liberal soft-heart and soft-headedness&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Springtime for Setup City    The Reformed Broker</title><link>http://www.thereformedbroker.com/2010/03/09/springtime-for-setup-city/#comment-38809830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I concur and, over the past week or so, have assembled and published four lists, each using a different criteria, comprised of over 400 stocks that look as if they're ready to move soon after the market convincingly breaks 1150.  They are worth taking a look for additions to your watchlist (&lt;a href="http://www.stockchartist.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.stockchartist.blogspot.com"&gt;www.stockchartist.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guru</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>