<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jmcdowell</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jmcdowell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jmcdowell/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:01:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Key Reversal Bar Seen on NASDAQ QQQQ</title><link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/key-reversal-bar-seen-on-nasdaq-qqqq/#comment-15744233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bought a slightly-out-of-the-money 39 Sep QQQQ Put.  Target 37 is June resistance also 0.618 retracement of mid-July to Late Aug rise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmcdowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:01:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gold Forming Symmetrical Triangle - Waiting for Breakout</title><link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/gold-forming-symmetrical-triangle/#comment-13700050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting observation: The length of the lower line of the triangle from first to third low divided by the length of the upper line from first to second peak is approx 1.618 phi.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmcdowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Year to Date Sector Returns as July ends</title><link>http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/year-to-date-sector-returns-as-july-ends/#comment-13699825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Several Utilities (SO, DUK, AEP) have been moving up the past several day suggesting many players are indeed seeking defense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmcdowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Citigroup Be Saved? :: InvestorPlace Blogs</title><link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/2009/03/can_citigroup_be_saved.html#comment-7456570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am skeptical of Citigroup given its out-of-pattern "leak" that it was profitable in Jan and Feb.  The reverse stock split adds to my skepticism.  But the intriguing thing is we might gain insight into the Board's confidence when the ratio is selected.  Citigroup's SEC filing cites seven potential ratios: "1-for-2, 1-for-5, 1-for-10, 1-for-15, 1-for-20, 1-for 25 or 1-for-30, as selected by our board of directors."  I'll interpret any choice on the low end of this range as confidence in C's prospects and any choice on the upper range as uncertainty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmcdowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stocks at a 12 year low, so much for the "hope and change" -- The Skeptical Capitalist</title><link>http://www.skepticalcapitalist.com/2009/02/stocks_at_a_12_year_lowwhere_a.html#comment-6732779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That Friedman-Donahue clip is priceless - thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jmcdowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>