<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jhancock</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jhancock/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jhancock/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:10:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Remote Pair Programming with Screen and Vim</title><link>http://haruska.com/2009/09/29/remote-pair-programming-with-screen-and-vim/#comment-18570048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sorry, i wasn't being clear enough.  screen requires both users to have login access to the same server.   For users in the same team/company, this isn't always a problem.  For outside support, it can be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jhancock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remote Pair Programming with Screen and Vim</title><link>http://haruska.com/2009/09/29/remote-pair-programming-with-screen-and-vim/#comment-18443011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;if your using Windows or Linux desktop, try ShellShadow.  Its a collaborative terminal client.  Basically, collaborative PuTTY.  It also resolves a need to have a shared server as you need with screen sharing.&lt;br&gt;No OS X client yet for ShellShadow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jhancock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Why I’m Not Excited</title><link>http://old.codebrief.com/2008/09/google-chrome-why-i%e2%80%99m-not-excited/#comment-2102100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree that a general purpose bytecode engine is key to success.  As a language hobbiest, I love the idea.  But javascript is "good enough";  and javascript "done right" is a killer feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jhancock</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:50:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bootstrappers Beware</title><link>http://www.tonywright.com/2008/bootstrappers-beware/#comment-720944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;amen brother!!!  My startup is &lt;a href="http://shellshadow.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://shellshadow.com"&gt;http://shellshadow.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;We are just coming out of what turned out to be a long R&amp;amp;D phase and will start aggressive marketing in a few weeks.  &lt;br&gt;I fully expect a 12-18 month cycle to get enough users to reach the second bar.  Sure, selling to a bigger software company that  has enough foresight in your product is a nice dream.  But you can't count on that.  You have to slog your way through and be able to survive a long long time on your own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jhancock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>