<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jeroenvandijk</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jeroenvandijk/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jeroenvandijk/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:12:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: HyperLogLog with Cascalog</title><link>http://screen6.github.io/blog/2013/11/13/hyperloglog-with-cascalog.html#comment-1128204726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would indeed expect it to be a fixed coefficient, so I'm sure it will get the job done :) I'm looking forward hearing about results of any benchmarking. If I get to it first, I'll let you know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:12:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HyperLogLog with Cascalog</title><link>http://screen6.github.io/blog/2013/11/13/hyperloglog-with-cascalog.html#comment-1126998566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this interesting blogpost! At AdGoji we use Cascalog together with Hyperloglog as well. I didn't consider using multimethods for the merging process, which looks elegant, instead we use protocols. Looking at your code I realized our implementation is not optimal either, so I thought of a way to translate your work with protocols. I believe something like this [1] would be faster than using multimethods as it doesn't need reflection (I still need to verify this).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href="https://gist.github.com/jeroenvandijk/7514963" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://gist.github.com/jeroenvandijk/7514963"&gt;https://gist.github.com/jer...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 11:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael van Rooijen (meskyanichi) - More concurrency on a single Heroku dyno with the new Celadon Cedar stack</title><link>http://michaelvanrooijen.com/articles/2011/06/01-more-concurrency-on-a-single-heroku-dyno-with-the-new-celadon-cedar-stack/#comment-381991460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems `heroku config:add DEBUG=true` does this&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://turriate.com/articles/2011/feb/testing-twitter-oauth-with-real-data/</title><link>http://turriate.com/articles/2011/feb/testing-twitter-oauth-with-real-data/#comment-139515189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you can get LinkedIn integration to work I would be keen to know. What I found so far doing the Oauth dance with LinkedIn is that it relies heavily on javascript (in the sense that it cannot be faked as easily as with Facebook and Twitter), which means it will not work with Capybara-mechanize.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please let me know if you do get it to work :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeroen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://turriate.com/articles/2011/feb/testing-twitter-oauth-with-real-data/</title><link>http://turriate.com/articles/2011/feb/testing-twitter-oauth-with-real-data/#comment-139513753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sandro,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At my company (&lt;a href="http://www.pinkelstar.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pinkelstar.com"&gt;http://www.pinkelstar.com&lt;/a&gt;) we also use it to test our integration with Twitter and Facebook. Our use case is to see whether our service can get still do the Oauth dance with these services. We use VCR to have fast fixtures based tests. Will have a look at your gem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you have any suggestions for improvements for Capybara-mechanize please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeroen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ps. Instead of setting the current_driver in the step definition you could also use the @mechanize tag or do something similar in a Before hook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Check your scripts with JSLint on Rails - Lunar Logic Polska</title><link>http://www.lunarlogicpolska.com/blog/2010/03/29/check-your-scripts-with-jslint-on-rails.html#comment-42252852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, this looks very useful!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagaholic - Hirb - Irb On The Good Stuff</title><link>http://tagaholic.me/2009/03/13/hirb-irb-on-the-good-stuff.html#comment-15700145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:53:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagaholic - Hirb - Irb On The Good Stuff</title><link>http://tagaholic.me/2009/03/13/hirb-irb-on-the-good-stuff.html#comment-15699205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it tried it. Hirb isn't even recognized as a constant. Even when I disable all my other magic tricks in irbrc it doesn't get recognized. I will file a ticket. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagaholic - Hirb - Irb On The Good Stuff</title><link>http://tagaholic.me/2009/03/13/hirb-irb-on-the-good-stuff.html#comment-15698321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunatly, that does not work with script/console WITHOUT changing your environment.rb and that's what I want.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reason is that ActiveRecord is not instantiated yet. Hirb does something with ActiveRecord so it should be initiated after ActiveRecord has been introduced, hence the hack. Of course, if there is a hook for irb that is executed after everything is loaded that would be better, but the above works like this hook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another option would be to define a method that requires it, but I want your hirb as default :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers, Jeroen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:01:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tagaholic - Hirb - Irb On The Good Stuff</title><link>http://tagaholic.me/2009/03/13/hirb-irb-on-the-good-stuff.html#comment-15652522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even better the following trick will include it in all your projects without changing environment.rb:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Put this in the file ~/.ircrc:&lt;br&gt;if ENV['RAILS_ENV']&lt;br&gt;	# Nice output for records requires   gem install cldwalker-hirb —source &lt;a href="http://gems.github.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://gems.github.com"&gt;http://gems.github.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;	module CallHirbWhenReady&lt;br&gt;		def inherited(subclass)&lt;br&gt;			super&lt;br&gt;			if !@hirb_required &amp;amp;&amp;amp; &lt;a href="http://subclass.name" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="subclass.name"&gt;subclass.name&lt;/a&gt; == "ActiveRecord::Base"&lt;br&gt;				begin&lt;br&gt;					require 'hirb'&lt;br&gt;					Hirb::View.enable&lt;br&gt;				ensure&lt;br&gt;					@hirb_required = true&lt;br&gt;				end&lt;br&gt;			end&lt;br&gt;		end&lt;br&gt;	end&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;	Object.send :extend, CallHirbWhenReady&lt;br&gt;end&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeroenvandijk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:08:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>