<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jerico</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jerico/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jerico/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:19:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: LHC Unlikely to Swallow Earth</title><link>http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2008/09/09/lhc-unlikely-to-swallow-earth/#comment-2515305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe I have to elaborate more about christianity that had been linked towards roman empire as what Kevin had said. FYI Romans failed to be within the empirical definition of christianity, they use christianity as the tool for catholicism and if im not mistaken catholicism means universality. Roman empire before according to the history is in the struggle of widening its territory by conquering neighboring states and even in the Sout East Asia. They use christianity as the spearhead of there hiden agenda.  What romans in the past centuries and even now so to speak are integrating PAGANISTIC beliefs as it is shown in their RITUALS and they rename their own creative integrations as christianity. Therefore, there is a profound misconceptions nowadays that connects christianity to roman infact NOT in the real sense. I think its time to correct that misconceptions.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerico</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LHC Unlikely to Swallow Earth</title><link>http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2008/09/09/lhc-unlikely-to-swallow-earth/#comment-2514810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Realy? I dont think so, i think its not harmful for us to consider some of the claims which you think hard to prove that is congruent to the point  that you cannot justify easily  why you are here in the world asking whats the purpose  of your existence, if you tried to figure out why then you have to think for reasons to support why you exist. You cannot generalize christianity as saying that anybody who believes about Christ is a christian, christianity is not a word to refer a person who knows Christ but to a person who practice the teaching of Christ, but this is not only the case, christianity is not only by that, the pure meaning is in the core of definitions, diving to the most empirical definition that describes about christianity. Why I say so? It's because there are people that cliams they are christians indeed they are not within the empirical description of becoming a christian.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jerico</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:07:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>