<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jeremyspiegel</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jeremyspiegel/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jeremyspiegel/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:58:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: I want to bring IE&amp;#8217;s back to Georgia tournaments</title><link>http://gaforensics.com/2009/10/i-want-to-bring-ies-back-to-georgia-tournaments/#comment-20619737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reason many tournament directors, including myself, have seperated the different levels of CX judges is that too many schools attempt to cover their varsity commitment by providing only novice judges.  I think I speak for most tournament directors when I say that  I would be happy to not collect a single dollar in judges fees if everyone covered their commitment. In your above example, if that school emailed the tournament saying that they are overcovering their Varsity commmitment and could they have that cover their half commitment in JV, I highly doubt any tournament would say no.  While the JOT system makes life a lot easier, it also takes away subjectivity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Jeremy Spiegel&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremyspiegel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>