<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jeremylichtman</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jeremylichtman/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jeremylichtman/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:25:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Want Success? Choose the Right Parents</title><link>http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-16/want-success-choose-the-right-parents#comment-1288825529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps he tracked people in the Middle Ages named "Hode" and determined how many were bandits, but I'm guessing that most such people simply won't enter the historical record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It obviously misses all of the Tailors (not Smiths - a blacksmith was a well-paid specialist) who climbed the ladder though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want Success? Choose the Right Parents</title><link>http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-16/want-success-choose-the-right-parents#comment-1288058986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I understand correctly, his data will only tell him that a unique family name with high status retains high status (not all that surprising given inheritance and educational opportunities).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It won't tell him if people with low status are climbing up into the "ranks" or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's an additional bias due to the selection of uncommon surnames. Think about where surnames come from - they're usually profession names, or were selected randomly from predetermined lists. A person with an unusual surname would likely have been high status in the first place (i.e. minor nobility, or people with money to purchase a "better" name), which is a serious statistical founder bias. The net result is that this statistic won't track upward mobility well, only the relative absence of downward mobility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitcoin Is a High-Tech Dinosaur Soon to Be Extinct</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-31/bitcoin-is-a-high-tech-dinosaur-soon-to-be-extinct.html#comment-1183183839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As an interesting aside, after a bunch of well publicized confiscations, the US government is one of the largest holders of BitCoins.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 09:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So You Think That 10,000-Hour Rule Will Make You An Expert? Wrong!</title><link>http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/so-you-know-that-10000-hours-makes-an-expert-rule-bunk/#comment-1026626599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All of the above is somewhat true. It is really important not to discount driving ambition, which can propel someone without "natural" talent or ability to accomplish things that might otherwise seem impossible. Few people cultivate such ambition though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitcoin Is Not as Secure, Unregulated, or Lucrative as You Might Think</title><link>http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/#comment-885547694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It isn't a trivial task to update the work function. The entire user-base has to do it, or else the blockchain would split. There may be other implications as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 17:20:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bitcoin Is Not as Secure, Unregulated, or Lucrative as You Might Think</title><link>http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/05/lets-cut-through-the-bitcoin-hype/#comment-885302482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I generally agree with everything here. One quibble - anyone with access to a BIG supercomputer (i.e. a government) could potentially cause havoc by creating multiple forks in the blockchain, or via sybil attacks. The risk decreases as the number of people using BTC grows, but never entirely goes away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 10:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hedge Funds Find Tech Stocks in the Bargain Bin</title><link>http://origin-www.businessweek.com/articles/c47a18f4-336f-11e2-8419-d8d385601e40/preview#comment-727058995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of value traps in the bargain bin too. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:55:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3D Printing Large Items</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/3d-printing-large-items/#comment-665596969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Objective is to keep it cheap. I'm thinking along the lines of a very simple conveyor belt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:42:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “Stealth mode” and other f’ing brilliant startup strategies</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2012/09/25/stealth-mode-and-other-fing-brilliant-startup-strategies/#comment-662389787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3D Printing Large Items</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/3d-printing-large-items/#comment-650383920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not necessarily. A big printer takes up lots of room. I've seen high-end ones advertised that can print out objects of several feet in each dimension, but you'd need a factory floor to put it on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going To Zero: Why More Public Companies Than Ever Before Will Be Worth Nothing</title><link>http://www.leighdrogen.com/going-to-zero-why-more-public-companies-than-ever-before-will-be-worth-nothing/#comment-646845086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, but would preface with "in certain industries". Technology in particular is prone to winner take all scenarios, in addition to offshoring effects. There are plenty of industries where that isn't the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toronto is broken</title><link>http://startupnorth.ca/2012/08/07/toronto-is-broken/#comment-625766510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think its a bit more subtle. In SF and NYC the startup community is very tightly knit, and everybody seems to know each other. In Toronto it seems like there's a bunch of different groups of founders doing similar things, but with poor inter-connectivity between the groups. That directly effects all of the issues you mentioned, ranging from mentoring, to fund-raising etc. There's nothing here like the PayPal Mafia - yet - which allows good ideas to be actively promoted quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://bencoe.tumblr.com/post/28287898568</title><link>http://bencoe.tumblr.com/post/28287898568#comment-606401947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Been through this process twice myself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was never able to raise outside funds (or even get a reasonable line of credit), so had to pay close attention to cashflow. Making payroll can age a person prematurely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It took me a lot longer than you to realize the bit about taking time away. Sounds like you're on the right track though. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What will cellphones look like in 5 years time?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/what-will-cellphones-look-like-in-5-years-time/#comment-599888853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Glass is likely to run on Android.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect we'll see some new OS'es, in addition to the existing / upcoming ones. There will likely be one or two more (probably futile) attempts to build "dumb phones" using something along the lines of Symbian, at least one new open source system, a few more attempts to get Linux running on phones etc etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What will cellphones look like in 5 years time?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/what-will-cellphones-look-like-in-5-years-time/#comment-599740399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe that Android falls in the category of pushing functionality into the cloud.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't believe it is going away.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect that (like Linux) its true significance will be seen further out though - possibly ten year's time - and will depend on whether consumers ultimately prefer their computing to happen locally or via the browser.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo should merge with RIM</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/business/yahoo-should-merge-with-rim#comment-548860913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I might be mistaken, or things might have changed. At the time, Yahoo! was listed in the news as one of the "and others" in the consortium.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spanish Banking Rescue Should Become Example for Europe</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-30/spain-s-banking-rescue-should-become-example-for-europe.html#comment-542737499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From what I can tell, the issues with the Spanish banks largely have to do with their purchases of Spanish government bonds (something like 60% of the total). As the yields have skyrocketed, their prices have fallen, taking the banks net worth (and all-important credibility) with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if a temporary measure that allowed those banks to bypass mark-to-market could help. Perhaps somebody with a better understand of this would be able to comment. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 23:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Yahoo! be turned around?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/can-yahoo-be-turned-around/#comment-540674587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't have any pull there either, but I can pass your comments along to some former employees who might still have contact there...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 22:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Yahoo! be turned around?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/can-yahoo-be-turned-around/#comment-530397947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there some kind of indication that they've given up on Groups? I'm not really familiar with the community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It could just be a matter of improving the quality of advertising across their system, in order to make it worthwhile from a cashflow perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Yahoo! be turned around?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/can-yahoo-be-turned-around/#comment-530380533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Y! is watching your comments! :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:59:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Yahoo! be turned around?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/can-yahoo-be-turned-around/#comment-530376350</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Disqus possibly had a cookie on your browser.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several of my friends use nonsense strings for their names. I usually just have to approve their comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can Yahoo! be turned around?</title><link>http://lichtman.ca/can-yahoo-be-turned-around/#comment-526320445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just an FYI - I believe I have this set up so that you can post without logging in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What you're describing is a cultural issue. It similar to the one faced by Jack Welch at GE in the early 80s. Getting rid of bureaucracy in a large organization is a big, ongoing task.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Dan Loeb Loves Yahoo's Résumé-Gate</title><link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-05-08/why-dan-loeb-loves-yahoos-r-sum-gate#comment-523188732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fixing the board will certainly help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect that there's an alignment issue here though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Loeb is looking for a short to mid-term gain in share price, at which point he is going to sell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The things necessary to get that price increase may result in some strategic decisions that hurt Y! in the long run though. I covered off some of this on my blog the other day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Granted, the current move to rapidly sell off Alibaba (possibly with insufficient due diligence), lay off people (some of whom are the only ones with knowledge of proprietary code) and orient towards ecommerce (which will hurt their cashflow among other things) are silly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they're going to "fix" Yahoo though, its going to take a longer term strategic approach though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Majorana Fermion &amp;#8211; Elusive Subatomic Particle Confirmed</title><link>https://www.singularityweblog.com/the-majorana-fermion-elusive-subatomic-particle-confirmed/#comment-517977045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The press on this one was atrocious.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Its a quasi-particle, in the same sense that a "hole" traveling in the opposite direction to electron current is a quasi-particle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I only partially understand how you could store information in them - I think its something like how an active memory array can have a particular bit set based on the presence of a small number of electrons. I'm guessing that the advantage here is that this isn't electrically charged, so in theory you could use a smaller number of them to store a bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mining a $20 trillion asteroid? New clues emerge about space robot startup</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2012/mining-20-trillion-asteroid-clues-space-robot-startup/#comment-502747463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Todd, is Arkyd the same company as Planetary Resources? Their websites appear to be in the same data center. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremylichtman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>