Disqus - Latest Comments for jeff4

Re: The Frog in the Pan

jeff4 — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:52:25 -0000

personally, i'd love a blogspot on autism causes. how about this DEFINITIVE graph for an answer to the cause!!

Re: The Frog in the Pan

jeff4 — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:29:44 -0000

Guys, its NOT CO2 or any "greenhouse" gas. ITS PIRATES. WE NEED MORE.

Re: The Frog in the Pan

jeff4 — Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:25:51 -0000

this might help explain global warming.

Re: The “Best Argument for Abortion” Was Completely Demolished by Matt Walsh

jeff4 — Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:57:57 -0000

Hey who removed my comment???My wife has an IUD and i don't like it. Shouldn't they be illegal? I don't want her killing those fertilized eggs without my permission!! They're children!! Well, wait, i guess i'm not sure. Have the eggs implanted? Does the IUD allow implanting? If it DOES then she's killing children. If it doesn't then ok i guess. Wait, that's not ok. My wife has fertilized eggs that her body is NOT ALLOWING TO IMPLANT. That's a crime. That's wrong to allow fertilized eggs not to implant. I think i read somewhere that 60-70% of all fertilized eggs do not implant correctly, that's millions and millions of souls who are lost every year. MILLIONS PEOPLE, this is the new holocaust. WE HAVE TO FIND A WAY TO SAVE THESE EGGS AND STOP THE USE OF THE IUD!!!!!!! VFORBA Your comment was removed too? I agree with you. No birth control pills either, they're killing babies too.

Re: The “Best Argument for Abortion” Was Completely Demolished by Matt Walsh

jeff4 — Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:07:29 -0000

My wife has an IUD. Should these be illegal because they cause abortions? What can the USA and the conservatives help us do to save the millions and millions of innocent lives lost when fertilized eggs do not implant in the uterus or are rejected by the mother? Should we prosecute these women whose bodies do not allow implantation??!! I read the other day that over 70% of all fertilized eggs do not implant properly or are rejected. This is the unseen holocaust. Please help.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:30:54 -0000

homosexuals in the clergy CAN NOW MARRY TOO! DOMA IS DEAD and LOVE IS LOVE. Equality in the eyes of the law, the catholic church is next!

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:58:12 -0000

want to guess how old this embryo is Ed? take a guess. Ok, i will tell you. its 11 weeks. This is the embryo of an elephant at 11 weeks. cool huh?

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:53:44 -0000

universal health care? care for the poor and sick? what an inspirational message!! YES! finally some catholic church doctrine i can believe in. Good message Pope Francis!

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:47:18 -0000

what do Penn and Teller call this?? Misdirection? answer my question please Mr. Ed! -- "I'll take your lack of a response as a white flag that you have no counter argument against my post above - the woman's body and mind CAN work together to make the best choice about when to have a child enter our world. Its her BODIE'S choice."

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:14:23 -0000

good move deflecting to this instead of answering my post.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Sat, 08 Jun 2013 07:42:43 -0000

I'll take your lack of a response as a white flag that you have no counter argument against my post above - the woman's body and mind CAN work together to make the best choice about when to have a child enter our world. Its her BODIE'S choice.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:28:44 -0000

You have better things to do with your life? Then why do you open yourself up to these tough questions with blogging????? Tough questions require tough answers. At least say I'm right. One second the mothers body can reject the holy fertilized egg and the next second her mind can't or it's the holocaust.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:55:05 -0000

when the going get's tough, Ed gets going. No last word by me, just your deafening silence again.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:03:11 -0000

I'm sure these rules are found in the scripture right Ed? Scripture based information is the rule of law in the catholic church. Wait, no scripture to back this up? So, let me guess, MEN made these rules. Fallible, often confused, often misguided, men. I do admit, i like your use of the word "NATURE" in your answer. Nature will take it's course, I like that. So, lets follow this to a logical conclusion - if the woman's BODY decides the time is not right, the egg is "bad", the chromosome number is not right, the BODY decides to not let it implant. That's ok by the catholic church, right? Now, the egg implants and the woman's MIND (part of her BODY) says, "hey wait, I"m on drugs, i don't have a job, I can't care for a baby, I'm 17, and i can't do it" then the morning after pill rejects the egg exactly 0.00006 seconds after implant. This is an immediate and moral outrage to the catholic church??? Wow, didnt realize a split second and half could be the difference between a holocaust and nature doing its thing.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Sat, 01 Jun 2013 21:24:48 -0000

Well said Ed, then you obviously agree that the billions of fertilized eggs that NEVER implant ARE the new holocaust. Does the catholic church have plans to save them? Will mass adoption to good catholic familes? In your words a fertilized egg "IS A NEW LIFE, AND BECAUSE IT IS A NEW LIFE IT IS SACRED." you better start saving those eggs Ed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You can't back track now and say "Well, wait once it IMPLANTS it is SACRED." You said a FERTILIZED EGG IS SACRED, RIGHT???

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Thu, 30 May 2013 18:11:02 -0000

no merry go round Ed, just seeking tough answers to tough questions, which as usual you can't provide. I will give you my answer -- NO. A fertilized egg is NOT a new person, not a new life, not sacred. Once it is born? yes. I know the sneaky answer you'd try to give Ed. So sneaky you won't even give it for fear of verbal backlash here.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Sun, 26 May 2013 19:04:58 -0000

A fertilized egg is a new person? a new life? sacred? yes or no

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Sun, 26 May 2013 19:03:37 -0000

nah, you won't get any conversation on that blog Ed. Last question, is this a voluntary retirement or has the RE grown weary of your catholic-holier-than-thou views?

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Thu, 23 May 2013 19:54:29 -0000

Ed has no response obviously ... deafening silence...

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 20 May 2013 19:46:14 -0000

I actually enjoy his hate spewing Homer. It reminds me that the good old USA has freedom of speech. Ed is free to spout hate and his opinion and we're here to tell him he's wrong. It always ends in impasse, but that's ok with me. I defend Ed's right to say what he says to the death of me! Now, is Ed correct???????? NO.

Re: Obama’s Definitions of Children and Adults

jeff4 — Mon, 20 May 2013 19:44:19 -0000

its getting crowded up in heaven Ed.... literally billions of fertilized eggs which failed to implant in the uterus are up there, poor souls!!! http://reason.com/archives/... The fertilized egg is a prized possession according to the catholic church and it's spokesman Ed H. Why doesn't the church take action to save the 50-80% of fertilized eggs which fail to implant??????????????!!!!!!!!!!! Ed, you will not read the article i've posted - you will get about a paragraph in and stop. I dare you to read it all. Like the title of the website, REASON.COM, its reason and logic based instead of the opinions of some men trying to run a religion.

As for trying to foist twisted logic on people, you've done it to us on this blog for years now Ed, no sense pointing fingers at Obama for the world's troubles.

You are ending your blogging here on Theology? This is, if i remember correctly, your second retirement!

Re: The Resignation of Popes

jeff4 — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:01:03 -0000

when i saw the new pope's name was FRANCIS i thought WOW THEY DID ELECT A WOMAN!!! WAHOO!!!!

Re: Fracking Fracas

jeff4 — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:30:08 -0000

If fracking IS the problem this will help solve it. http://stateimpact.npr.org/... Is the gas/oil business willing to allow these nano-tracers?? If it is as they say, and fracking does NOT pollute then they should be willing to allow this!

Re: Christianity … a target of NBC

jeff4 — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:04:04 -0000

you sure have Ed. I agree. I picture a long haired guy wearing sandals, talking peace, talking about loving your neighbor, talking about feeding the poor, healing the sick. I picture a hippie dude saying the meek shall inherit the earth. Turn your swords into plowshares. I dont picture him saying to a gay couple "your lifestyle is an abhorrent mutation of nature." I dont picture him repealing welfare for small children and the poor like Paul Ryan wants. What do you picture?

Re: Christianity … a target of NBC

jeff4 — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:01:25 -0000

So now you are using two religions YOU DISAGREE WITH AND TOTALLY DONT BELIEVE IN to support your argument??????? Come one Ed, that's bad logic. Did Jesus mention MURDER? Yes, so what you are saying is that being gay is WORSE than being a murderer? Ed, that's about as whacko as it gets. Jesus doesnt mention the REALLY bad things like being gay, only the moderately bad things like murder, divorce, ??