<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of jeancharles</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jeancharles/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jeancharles/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:15:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Delicious 2.0: Who bookmarks any more?</title><link>(u'http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/07/31/delicious-20-who-bookmarks-any-more/',%201073684L)#comment-1073684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would agree with you and... disagree at the same time. I guess ever since &lt;a href="http://Del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Del.icio.us"&gt;Del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; hit the market other competitors emerged and, in time, several took their share in what &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; could pretend once to have the monopoly. The reason is: there are several ways of bookmarking because there are as many intentions when one wants to save a link.&lt;br&gt;The way I personally bookmark:&lt;br&gt;1 - a site: Stumbleupon&lt;br&gt;2 - an article, more specifically: Diigo (with our without addition of a sticky)&lt;br&gt;3 - a content I want to retrieve and won't be certain to retrieve whenever I'll need it: Google notebook&lt;br&gt;4 - an article I don't care to keep but want to share with others: Facebook this, Friendfeed this, Twine this, Tumblr this, etc. depending on whom it may best/most concern (friends, colleagues, business partners, people you only know from have friended them via various platforms, ...)&lt;br&gt;5 - anything else (and sometimes redundant with a/m bookmarking facilities): &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt;. A word concerning the latter: Many a time I've found better quality infos (and faster too) using &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; than merely googling for them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many ways of bookmarking because what is ... bookmark-able is also very diverse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My 2 cts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intersections: Twitter, Track, and CNN</title><link>(u'http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/08/23/intersections-twitter-track-and-cnn/',%201794945L)#comment-1794945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's have conversation and particularly comments take central stage instead of having them marginally count and put behind mere votes/clicks/duggs and what have you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Journalism</title><link>(u'http://paulallison.tumblr.com/post/47325658',%201828508L)#comment-1828508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Several ways of considering safety:&lt;br&gt;- personal safety like disclosing where you live, you phone number(s), you bank card number + pin, etc.&lt;br&gt;- protecting yourself from spam&lt;br&gt;- protecting your privacy, your intimacy, your secret garden.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much depend on who you deal with: family, friends, colleagues, total strangers from across the globe,...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Answer to each question (plus others I haven't listed here) depends on everybody's personality, human values, confidence in others, in themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lapin's log - À compter du 12 janvier 2009, tout voyageur...</title><link>(u'http://lelapin.tumblr.com/post/55052764',%203144099L)#comment-3144099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;avec un yahoo pipe spécifiquement dédié à ça, voilà comment s'en souvenir.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitternomics: How Will Twitter Make Money, Not Whether Twitter Will Make Money</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/10/twitternomics-h.html',%203153811L)#comment-3153811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As sad as it may sound I believe more in alternative solutions to Twitter than in Twitter itself. Although it is Twitter that first paved the path to microblogging others might actually benefit from that idea. I have in mind Yammer which cleverly aims at companies and would sell specific admin tools.&lt;br&gt;On a broader scale the business models for web2.0 apps can only be the same as they were for web1.0 or for any other businesses for that matter:&lt;br&gt;- appealing customers.&lt;br&gt;- selling them extra features.&lt;br&gt;- keeping them by constantly creating added values.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:49:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lapin's log - “… Je pense qu’il vaut mieux que les français...</title><link>(u'http://lelapin.tumblr.com/post/55663561',%203208614L)#comment-3208614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On l’on occulte et escamote en sous-entendant que l’ouverture des magasins le Dimanche est OK. Quant au point de vue, il reste très discutable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:20:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Metaphor: The Workstream as Subject Only Emails</title><link>(u'http://workstreamer.com/blog/2008/08/27/stutzman-metaphor-workstream-subject-only-email/',%203641690L)#comment-3641690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One might argue that, like the distributed water cooler or the coffee machine, one is not supposed to remain there all day long. Like there are times for  checking out e-mails and others for logging off and get actually some work done I don't see how yet another stream of infos, although offloaded from the inbox, can prove any relevance in the context of work.&lt;br&gt;For the record I'm all for using alternative tools to e-mails but so far failed to find sound arguments and strong examples to back up any of them (wikis, blogs, twitter-likes, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get Satisfaction Announces Socialized Ad Policy</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/11/get-satisfactio.html',%203641870L)#comment-3641870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as I can see the advantage for active participants and, even, 'Get Satisfaction' to not be subject to (too much) advertisement I see here a problem for companies at the origin of the ads themselves: who originally pays for 'Get Satisfaction' to remain online?&lt;br&gt;Mind you I'm not advocating advertisement here but wish to point out a problem of wrong (and simplistic) message being conveyed: implying that advertisement is plainly bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:36:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tumblr Fing</title><link>(u'http://fing.tumblr.com/post/59731551',%203784840L)#comment-3784840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;-Interesting online app. Strange thing I noticed (but maybe it is my browser that hasn't parsed it correctly) is that it's their icon that shows up in the URL field but HP's...&lt;br&gt;- application interessante. Une chose étrange que j'ai noté (mais peut-être est-ce mon navigateur qui ne l'a pas bien 'traduit') est que ce n'est pas leur icone qui apparait dans la champs de l'URL mais celui d'HP...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Typepad Still Stuck In Second Gear</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/11/typepad-still-s.html',%203985809L)#comment-3985809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to be on LJ, left it at about the same time it was bought out by some Russian company (just coincidental). Was never attracted by any other platform 6Apart own(ed)s, be they Movable type, typepad or Vox. Moved to Wordpress instead.&lt;br&gt;Do you know Google trends? Here a little comparison for you: &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=wordpress%2C+typepad&amp;amp;ctab=0&amp;amp;geo=US&amp;amp;date=all&amp;amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/trends?q=wordpress%2C+typepad&amp;amp;ctab=0&amp;amp;geo=US&amp;amp;date=all&amp;amp;sort=0"&gt;http://www.google.com/trend...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't regretted moving. Maybe it's time for you to consider alternatives. Mine is not the only one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: /Ambivalence</title><link>(u'http://ambivalence.tumblr.com/post/62346703',%204079151L)#comment-4079151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The term 'chaos' may be too strong a term. The Chinese economy has, more than ever before, the financial resources to go through this storm with better chances of overcoming it than indebted countries. The next step is developing its enormous internal market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Working On The Streamflow: A Microstreaming Workflow</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/12/working-on-the.html',%204404741L)#comment-4404741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to totally overlook FriendFeed which could help addressing your problem. Part of it might be, pardon me in advance for saying this, that you persist in using Twitter. Go to your account on FF [&lt;a href="https://friendfeed.com/account" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://friendfeed.com/account"&gt;https://friendfeed.com/account&lt;/a&gt;] have a look.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Predictions For 2009</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/12/10-predictions.html',%204801865L)#comment-4801865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"6 - Wikipedia board drops Jimmy Wales, switches to ad revenue model. Please."&lt;br&gt;Please what? That Wikipedia drops J.Wales or that it switches to ad revenue? I for one don't care about what happens to J.Wales, I care more that Wikipedia remains ad free (and, for the second year, donated in that regard).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Predictions For 2009</title><link>(u'http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2008/12/10-predictions.html',%204812585L)#comment-4812585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a certain sense of responsibility and ownership in donating that, I'm afraid, switching to a anonymous advert based model may loose.&lt;br&gt;Not that I own Wikipedia if I only donate a $100 but I feel more inclined to support it and, yes, advertise about it than I would if such a relationship disappeared.&lt;br&gt;This relation, in my opinion, is similar to the one those who contribute build in time with the site. This is in essence the type of relationship the Wiki concept is based upon.&lt;br&gt;Besides, isn't there a different business model than advertisement?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FF2Disqus v0.3</title><link>(u'http://cubanlinks.org/blog/2009/01/10/ff2disqus-v03/',%205045044L)#comment-5045044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I understand correctly, since it's now FF-&amp;gt;Disqus, whatever comment I write on FF will end up on Disqus... and this is where I get confused: why the addition of a blog (in my case I picked tumblr)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:15:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Connected</title><link>(u'http://leoville.com/2009/01/13/21822/',%205165935L)#comment-5165935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have an account on both, Disqus and Facebook. I will continue to comment logged un Disqus as I have set up Friendfeed with all my social accounts something I only have partially done on Facebook.&lt;br&gt;Regarding your post am I glad Friendfeed appears to be too complicated (???) vs FB or Twitter. This results in a lot less noise there and generally more 'mature' inputs from the community.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bush slips in one more shot against France</title><link>(u'http://americablog.com/2009/01/bush-slips-in-one-more-shot-against.html',%205238636L)#comment-5238636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coming from someone who's been thrown shoes at what remains to be said that hasn't been already?&lt;br&gt;"Dear Mr President, take a walk with me..."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable on Tumblr - Kodak moment!

 Awww…a little gadget fan.

 (A...</title><link>(u'http://mashable.tumblr.com/post/71916637',%205414437L)#comment-5414437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who is she? One of the president's daughter?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 With A Bullet</title><link>(u'http://leoville.com/2009/01/30/21920/',%205721108L)#comment-5721108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd have to think long and hard to remember when I first came across your online existence. I think it was from a comment on someone else's torrential flow of tweets I was following (dumped since). I've become a regular viewer of your shows on Twit since then. Keep it up mister and congrats for a job well done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tumbléo</title><link>(u'http://leo.tumblr.com/post/78427623',%206270784L)#comment-6270784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent. Trader Joe's can't really endorse it as lyrics can be ... borderline rude but I  have the feeling the guy who shot this and edited the video loves his trader Joe's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FingLive!</title><link>(u'http://fing.tumblr.com/post/79801381',%206424327L)#comment-6424327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personnellement j'en doute fortement. Peut-être plus exclusivement Geeky mais pas encore tout à fait mainstream.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:03:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As the Twitter Tweets &amp;ndash; the please shoot me now episode</title><link>(u'http://www.inquisitr.com/19054/as-the-twitter-tweets-the-please-shoot-me-now-episode/',%206776321L)#comment-6776321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;if the business model consists in getting part of what mobile companies already charge customers for sending SMS's I'm all for it. If, on the other hand, said companies charge an extra, even though it would benefit Twitter, then I wouldn't be so pleased. Part of SMS's are exchanged because Twitter created the business, so to each his own.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please Retweet Me Makes Retweeting Dead Simple</title><link>(u'http://mashable.com/2009/03/07/please-retweet-me/',%206987535L)#comment-6987535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use Tweetree that, unlike the genuine Twitter website, allows retwitt(er?)ing. This said I don't see the point of using yet another website for only this purpose; like someone already commented here it looks like the perfect tool for chain letter, enough noise on Twitter already.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If You Are Doing An Event, Bring Twitter Into The Room</title><link>(u'http://avc.com/2009/03/if-you-are-doing-an-event-bring-twitter-into-the-room/',%207008141L)#comment-7008141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It is hard to moderate a conversation of 40 people and there are times when several people want to make a point but one gets the opportunity. I started to notice that the others would simply post their thought to twitter instead which allowed the rest of the room to see what they wanted to say in parallel with the point that was being made live."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very clever indeed. One of the first time I actually read an application of Twitter with a positive aspect to it, professionally useful and, at last, convincing. I'll spread the word, thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tired of Twitter Talk?</title><link>(u'http://leoville.com/2009/03/15/21964/',%207250129L)#comment-7250129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Twitter is a big story, and getting bigger all the time. We talk about it because it’s one of the biggest stories of the day"&lt;br&gt;This is true and I, for one, am very happy about its success and continue to be delighted by the creativity of many apps that surround Twitter. Still, mentioning how many followers one has is considered a faux-pas, a major one at that, and it's not even news for that matter. Correct me if I'm wrong Twitter is not a popularity contest is it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plerudulier</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>