<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jdimeas</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jdimeas/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jdimeas/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:25:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Happy OnePlus Day! Get yourself a pair of OnePlus Buds or OnePlus Bullet Wireless Zs for just $1</title><link>https://www.xda-developers.com/oneplus-day-oneplus-buds/#comment-5156512455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a joke, Sale started at 10 am CST. By 10.01 they were all sold out. They must have had 4 or 5 available. Just a marketing ploy. I will never give my business to OnePlus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blast from the past: Google just marked the Nexus 6P early shutdown issue as 'fixed'</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2019/11/13/nexus-6p-early-shutdown-fixed/#comment-4688234399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course I did. This was the Nexus, the Google phone. Bought one for me and a second one for my son. When both started shutting down I contacted Google and they told me to contact Huawei. Huawei told me to call Google. Eventually Google sued them and a Class Action was filed against both. In the meantime I have 2 Google flagship devices that don't work and I have a business that runs off my cell phone. Why would I not cut and run?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:06:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blast from the past: Google just marked the Nexus 6P early shutdown issue as 'fixed'</title><link>http://androidpolice.com/2019/11/13/nexus-6p-early-shutdown-fixed/#comment-4687680159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The 6P caused me to leave Android forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Assistant is officially rolling out to an Android device near you</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/google_assistant_is_officially_rolling_out_to_an_android_device_near_you/#comment-3191376596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's nothing you can do to force Google Assistant to go live on your phone. It's a server side issue. Just have to wait for it. It's not really that big of a deal. Very similar to Google Now. Never used it much before and not using Google Assistant much either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Assistant is officially rolling out to an Android device near you</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/google_assistant_is_officially_rolling_out_to_an_android_device_near_you/#comment-3191050522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't know what it was when I got Assistant but now it's 6.14.14.21.arm64.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Assistant is officially rolling out to an Android device near you</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/google_assistant_is_officially_rolling_out_to_an_android_device_near_you/#comment-3190932284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to my post, 10.2.98 but currently on 10.5.37.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Assistant is officially rolling out to an Android device near you</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/google_assistant_is_officially_rolling_out_to_an_android_device_near_you/#comment-3183279371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just got home and checked my 6P and Google Assistant is up and running.  Had no indication it was running until I checked.  Have a Nexus 6P running 7.1.2 on the Beta Program.  My version of Google Play Services is 10.2.98 but never had to update it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 15:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3D Moto X 2017 renders leak [VIDEO]</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/3d_moto_x_2017_renders_leak_video/#comment-3076311052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Done with Motorola after they stopped supporting the 2014 Moto X one year after it was released. Unforgivable. Lost me as a customer forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moto's 2016 phones willl get Nougat by year's end</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/motos_2016_phones_willl_get_nougat_by_years_end/#comment-2921479995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll believe it when I see it.  Besides,  even if they do update it this time,  based on what they did to the 2014 Moto X,  I bet this will be the last update this phone ever gets. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moto's 2016 phones willl get Nougat by year's end</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/motos_2016_phones_willl_get_nougat_by_years_end/#comment-2921462426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will believe it when I see it.  Even if that happens,  based on how the abandoned support of the 2014 Moto X,  I bet this will be the last update this phone receives. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:16:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Fi may be offering group plans in the near future</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/project_fi_may_be_offering_group_plans_in_the_near_future/#comment-2884411212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This showed up on my Google settings a couple of days ago.  Will be interesting to see how this works.  If you are afraid of  battery issues then simply don't enable it.  It's a free country.  Nobody is forcing you to use this feature. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Motorola confirms it won't be providing monthly Android Security updates</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/motorola_confirms_it_wont_be_providing_monthly_android_security_updates/#comment-2805076145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is anyone surprised?  Motorola stopped updating the 2014 Moto X a year after it was released.  Whenever I would post a comment online Motorola's apologists would blame the carriers and make excuses for Motorola.  I told you so. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Motorola doesn't seem interested in committing to monthly security updates for the Moto Z</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/motorola_doesnt_seem_interested_in_committing_to_monthly_security_updates_for_the_moto_z/#comment-2797826232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the same company that stopped supporting the 2nd generation Moto X a year after it was released even though the promise to quickly update the phone was a major selling point.  After this happened I ditched my Moto X and went with the Nexus 6P and was getting monthly updates until I recently updated to Android N through the Beta program.  I'm done with Motorola.  A carrier that quits supporting their flagship device a year after it is released foes not deserve my business.  What Motorola is doing with the Z was foreseeable. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Download: Verizon's redesigned 'My Verizon' app makes its arrival on the Play Store</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/download_verizons_redesigned_my_verizon_app_makes_its_arrival_on_the_play_store/#comment-2771288015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are running N through the Beta program on your Nexus 6P you cannot sign in.  Not much of an "update" for some. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Go on, celebrate: the Comcast + Time Warner Cable merger is officially dead</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/go_on_celebrate_the_comcast_time_warner_cable_merger_is_officially_dead/#comment-1985726414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a good day indeed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;T responds to T-Mobile with their own rollover data, but with a catch</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/att_responds_to_t_mobile_with_their_own_rollover_data_but_with_a_catch/#comment-1777412354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm totally with you. I was with T-Mobile since 2002, back when they were known as Voice Stream. I left about 4 years ago because of bad coverage.  I would go back if I was convinced that I could count on solid coverage. I am totally satisfied with Verizon's coverage and quality of service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;T responds to T-Mobile with their own rollover data, but with a catch</title><link>https://disqus.com/home/discussion/phandroid/att_responds_to_t_mobile_with_their_own_rollover_data_but_with_a_catch/#comment-1777048514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a Verizon customer I am grateful that T-Mobile is around.  Now you know why the Feds stopped AT&amp;amp;T's attempted takeover many years back. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:54:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cubs Notes: Samardzija, Hammel: MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com</title><link>http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/02/cubs-notes-samardzija-hammel.html#comment-1227367613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct.  We're talking about the Cubs and for the Cubs he is their Tanana. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 23:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cubs Notes: Samardzija, Hammel: MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com</title><link>http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/02/cubs-notes-samardzija-hammel.html#comment-1227357403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what ace means.  The Cubs number one starter.  Who do you think is better on that starting pitching staff????? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cubs Notes: Samardzija, Hammel: MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com</title><link>http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/02/cubs-notes-samardzija-hammel.html#comment-1227147748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't put my finger on it but something is wrong between the Cubs and Samardzija. Hammel gets 6 million while they only offer Samardzija 4.4 million. Meanwhile Samardzija is asking for 6.2 which is not much for an ace starter.  Yet the Cubs are asking too much for him in a trade.  This is a dysfunctional relationship.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Moto X could sell for a Nexus-like $300</title><link>http://phandroid.com/2013/07/31/report-moto-x-could-sell-for-300-dollars/#comment-983522401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Covert_Death for making me feel a little better tonight. I would be a happy Verizon customer if I could buy this phone for $300 and use it on the best network in the country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 01:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Moto X could sell for a Nexus-like $300</title><link>http://phandroid.com/2013/07/31/report-moto-x-could-sell-for-300-dollars/#comment-983493429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you are right.  I gladly pay more for my service because it is clearly the best service. No complaints. I will be glad if Verizon continued to provide a nano sim card for people that buy the X Phone from Motorola.  We'll have to wait and see what happens tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 01:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Moto X could sell for a Nexus-like $300</title><link>http://phandroid.com/2013/07/31/report-moto-x-could-sell-for-300-dollars/#comment-983470631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon is not going to make it that easy on you.  How much do you think they will charge you for the Nano sim card?  Maybe require you sign a 2 year contract.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Moto X could sell for a Nexus-like $300</title><link>http://phandroid.com/2013/07/31/report-moto-x-could-sell-for-300-dollars/#comment-983467859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I predict Verizon is going to nail us on the cost of the nano sim card. Maybe require a 2 year contract for a nano sim card that works on the X Phone. Mark my words.  There is no way Verizon is going to allow people to buy a phone like this off-contract for $300 and not make any commitment to Verizon. Motorola will design the phone to make Verizon happy because Verizon is their biggest customer. Last week announced that they will be the exclusive provider of the Droid series.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Moto X could sell for a Nexus-like $300</title><link>http://phandroid.com/2013/07/31/report-moto-x-could-sell-for-300-dollars/#comment-983461808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon LTE phones use a micro sim card. But since the Motorola X will use a nano sim card we are going to have to get one from Verizon. I predict Verizon is going to charge a pretty penny, or require a 2 year contract for a nano sim card that will work on the X Phone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Dimeas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>