Disqus - Latest Comments for jasonbrooks

Re: Ubuntu Electric Pork to try

jasonbrooks — Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:27:33 -0000

Works great! https://twitter.com/jasonbr... https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Re: Blogs are pretty good

jasonbrooks — Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:48:27 -0000

Sure, I'd help test

Re: Blogs are pretty good

jasonbrooks — Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:59:54 -0000

+1 I would've commented on your other post, but I use Linux. :)

Re: Questions about Little Outliner 2

jasonbrooks — Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:52:14 -0000

I see, I didn't realize that LO2 tweeted for you. I may try it out anyway, but I'm quicker to authorize apps that don't have this access. The typical, no-auth-required, "tweet this" type links that you find on regular web pages already make it very easy to tweet things.

Re: Questions about Little Outliner 2

jasonbrooks — Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:14:37 -0000

This is the authorization dialog I get. The update your profile and post tweets for you bits have given me pause.

Re: Electromagnetic Wave Gun Zaps Drones, Provides Hope To SF

jasonbrooks — Tue, 17 May 2016 16:30:26 -0000

I didn't know that an SF drone problem was a thing.

Re: SF's Latest Startup Founder/Unwise Blogger Calls For Crucifixions Of 'The City'

jasonbrooks — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:14:58 -0000

I'd tell someone proposing bus tickets to elsewhere as a homelessness solution that those bussed away would remain free to return, so it wouldn't solve the problem. If you don't want to see homeless people, you'll have to help homeless people find homes. Continue to feel selfish about it, or not, but you have to contribute to an *actual* solution.

Re: SF's Latest Startup Founder/Unwise Blogger Calls For Crucifixions Of 'The City'

jasonbrooks — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:11:32 -0000

So what if people have selfish reasons for ending homelessness? Getting people a place to live is the important thing, and it'll take the efforts of people with all sorts of motivations to make it happen.

Re: After Hours And Hours Of Public Comment, Board Of Supes OKs 5M Development In SoMa

jasonbrooks — Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:48:27 -0000

Yeah, I'm on board w/ the whole not enough supply leads to high prices idea, but I'm imagining that some people are looking for actual luxury, like... I don't know, giant kitchens and killer views and big bathroom hot tubs or something. I bought my place in SF on the open market, so I figure that was market rate, but if I advertised it as "luxury," I don't think it'd qualify. :)

Re: After Hours And Hours Of Public Comment, Board Of Supes OKs 5M Development In SoMa

jasonbrooks — Wed, 18 Nov 2015 20:59:53 -0000

No-agenda question: Does market-rate always equal luxury now?

Or, is it that if you're building a unit, and you're going to sell at market rate, you'll always make that unit a luxury unit, to maximize what you can charge?

I've been assuming that there's some sort of swankness or, like, luxury involved in the luxury units, but since I only see units described as below market or luxury, I'm starting to wonder if those are the only two categories?

Re: Automate GitHub Pages publishing with Jekyll and Travis CI

jasonbrooks — Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:24:39 -0000

chmod +x build.sh

Re: Why I’ll Leave Ubuntu Linux

jasonbrooks — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:23:25 -0000

That's interesting about the Cyanogenmod -- that bit is worth talking about, IMO, it makes the Ubuntu mobile project seem more attractive to me, since I already know and use CM.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.2 Edition

jasonbrooks — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:07:22 -0000

I didn't cover fake kvm in this walkthrough. Are you trying to set this up on a machine without hardware virt extensions?

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.2 Edition

jasonbrooks — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:05:00 -0000

oVirt needs to be able ssh to itself from the hostname you provide for this to work.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.2 Edition

jasonbrooks — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:56:32 -0000

Hey Ryan, check out: http://wiki.ovirt.org/How_t...

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:21:41 -0000

That step should no longer be necessary -- the bug was fixed. I'll cross that bit out in my post.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:24:18 -0000

OK. This is indeed another bug. Your system is pulling in v 3.2 of the sdk, and it should be using v 3.1. You should be able to
"yum downgrade http://www.ovirt.org/releas..." and then add "exclude=ovirt-engine-sdk" under the [main] section of your /etc/yum/yum.conf file. That will prevent that packaged from being upgraded. This should allow you to do engine-cleanup and then set up the engine. I've filed a bug about this, hopefully it'll be addressed soon.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:29:04 -0000

What version of ovirt-engine-sdk are you running? You can see w/ "yum info ovirt-engine-sdk"

Re: Too Fast, Too Slow

jasonbrooks — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:22:30 -0000

You can look into http://libguestfs.org/virt-...

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:01:24 -0000

Hmm, this does seem like a different issue -- I haven't seen it before, but someone in the irc room today was asking about what looks like the same issue. I'll try to reproduce it.

You might try going into the admin console and adding a local datacenter from there. See if you hit this same error through that path. Either way, this does look like a (new) bug w/ the all in one plugin.

You should consider stopping in, as well, at the irc room, it's #ovirt on the OFTC network. My handle is #jbrooks there.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:34:37 -0000

When the script sees that there's already an iso domain in the place where you tell it to create an iso domain, it stops, lest it overwrite something you don't intend to overwrite.

So, you need to either delete the files in /mnt that engine-setup created (it's going to be a directory with a long name) or provide a different mount point, like /mnt/iso.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:08:28 -0000

There was a bug w/ vdsm and post 3.5 versions of the kernel. That bug is now fixed w/ vdsm-4.10.0-10.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:05:43 -0000

It looks like your nic is called p6p1, so you want to edit the file ifcfg-p6p1.

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Thu, 04 Oct 2012 01:32:52 -0000

All right, I've set up oVirt 3.1 on an F17 machine installed from the regular live CD media, and I hit the same issues you've been seeing, Stephen.

There are two additional steps required -- first, we have to enable the sshd service, which is something we already figured out:

sudo systemctl start sshd.service
sudo systemctl enable sshd.service

The second item is disabling networkmanager:

sudo systemctl stop NetworkManager.service
sudo systemctl disable NetworkManager.service
sudo vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, and set the NM managed value to no.

Then clean up your engine setup:

vi /etc/exports and remove the /mnt/iso line

Then "sudo rm -rf /mnt/iso" to remove your iso domain mount point (assuming that this is your iso mount point.

Then "sudo engine-cleanup" and "sudo reboot" to restart.

After these steps, you should be able to "sudo engine-setup" and answer all the questions. The all in one install might stop at the installing vdsm stage (that timeout needs to be longer) just as it did in my video. You should, though, be able to proceed as I do in the video if that happens.

So, the key was the NetworkManager bit -- that has to be disabled -- it holds up the all in one install. Since NetworkManager being enabled is the default for the regular Fedora install media, though, this is definitely a bug -- something that needs to be dealt with.

In my own installs, I've been using the DVD or the network install image and only installing a minimal system (no networkmanager). And I always interact with with my minimal system via ssh, so I've been automatically enabling that.

Anyway, I hope you're still with me (thanks for your patience!) and I hope this works for you!!

Re: Up and Running with oVirt, 3.1 Edition

jasonbrooks — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:48:35 -0000

OK, one thing is that you need to be running a pre 3.5 kernel, due to a bug that affects ovirt attaching to nfs domains: https://bugzilla.redhat.com...

I haven't gone through this process on a full f17 install, I've always used a minimal install. Maybe there's a conflict in the full install that I'm not seeing. I'm going to run through the process on a full install to see.