<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jamiehardt</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jamiehardt/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jamiehardt/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:10:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: HP webOS devices (TouchPad, Veer, and Pre series) to be killed in Q4 2011</title><link>http://thisismynext.com/2011/08/18/hp-webos-touchpad-pre-3-killed-q4-2011/#comment-290419977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's those commercials where a celebrity holds the tablet over their face while their face talks on it.  I saw several of them before I even realized it was for a WebOS tablet.  That's the problem, the XOOM and the Thrive and the Galaxy Tab all sort of smear together in advertising.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Scandal of the Foreclosure Mess - Megan McArdle - Business - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/10/the-real-scandal-of-the-foreclosure-mess/64289/#comment-85297594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Attempt&lt;/em&gt; to defend a federal land registration system on its own merits without changing the subject.  I admit I don't really care about the principle involved -- a Federal MERS that can walk into a court and basically claim whatever its computers say that day is the indefeasible title to a lot in question is a bit more creepy to me than raising your taxes if you don't have health insurance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"It *would* take a lot of money out of the pockets of states and counties, but oh well."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This seems like a  serious bug to me, since that money's going to end up coming back to the locality anyways, but instead of being spent by the city council, it'll be disbursed by the congressional earmark and block grant process, with the concomitant strings attached.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Scandal of the Foreclosure Mess - Megan McArdle - Business - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/10/the-real-scandal-of-the-foreclosure-mess/64289/#comment-85263581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that a few US jurisdictions implement a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrens_title" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrens_title"&gt;Torrens title&lt;/a&gt; system, which is what you're describing.  However some people here seem to be arguing that we should have a federalized title system, which some European countries have, and definitely make the system more "efficient," but it significantly widens the scope of federal power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Singular Software: PluralEyes</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/1229596624#comment-84166076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Horrifying in the sense of 'uncanny' I guess&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dumb Arguments</title><link>http://motherjones.com/node/79011#comment-80868582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why are you still reading Megan, Kevin?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Business of War - Ta-Nehisi Coates - Culture - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2010/09/the-business-of-war/63024/#comment-78216361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been reading Barbara Tuchman's "The Proud Tower" recently and if there's anything that united the aristocracies of Europe before World War I it was the attitude that working and making money was simply beneath them.  They would spend all their time worrying about how to SPEND it, and they might occasionally tolerate a wealthy industrialist or artist at their parties, but generally they saw people who were self-made or merely wealthy, even like Andrew Carengie when he bought a house in England, as being parvenus and not having the sort of character necessary to stand in the elite of society.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since Imperial-World War period plays a very similar function in European history as the Manifest destiny-Civil War plays in American history, I can't help to see the parallel.  The elites of the southern US before the Civil War and Europe before World War I believed that working for a living damaged one's character and made one unfit to lead; it made someone self-interested and greedy, and liable to bend laws to accumulate more wealth, instead of making money the only way that was truly appropriate for the gentry, namely, through rents on hereditary land.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Infographic: Inception Timeline</title><link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/07/27/infographic-inception-timeline/#comment-64741619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All parting guests of Inception will enjoy a complimentary home game.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:04:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/530908373</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/530908373#comment-45397297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well at least he seems to have a sense of humor...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill Gates on the iPad: Hey, Apple, You’re Doing It Wrong</title><link>http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100210/bill-gates-on-ipad/#comment-33589117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BillG has been going on about voice control UI and handwriting recognition concepts for a decade now, and the company has made about zero progress in actually shipping this feature in a way that isn't a hinderance over a keyboard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think these features are just personal hobbyhorses for him, even after he's gone from the company, and he simply cannot credit a tablet for what it is if it's lacking those features.  Notice he doesn't bother mentioning the more obvious and generic problems, like multitasking, the business situation with the app store, the whole Flash situation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's possible BillG got an idea in his head around 2000 about what the "future of computing" was going to look like, and it looked a lot like a Tablet running Windows X.0 with voice commands and a stylus, and he's blinkered and can't objectively evaluate similar products that don't check off all his boxes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the iPad doesn't work, there's going to be a lot of Android pads by Christmas time this year, and it's pretty clear, at this time, that a tablet you buy in the next two years is going to be running a souped-up mobile OS with mobile OS's semantics, and that the PC-OS-on-a-tablet concept, at this point, can be accurately called a failed experiment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GF1 Field Test &amp;mdash; 16 Days in the Himalayas</title><link>http://craigmod.com/journal/gf1-fieldtest/#comment-26201041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know what, I discovered the 1:1 zoom button, but wow it's beautiful.  I'd ask if you knew how many footcandles were off the key, but that might be pushing it :P  Did you do any noise reduction on this shot in post, or did you push it at all?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GF1 Field Test &amp;mdash; 16 Days in the Himalayas</title><link>http://craigmod.com/journal/gf1-fieldtest/#comment-26200807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What was the light source for people-1-large jpeg, the interior shot of the woman at ISO 400?  I don't really see the noise problem you're complaining about.  If you could demonstrate the ISO noise with an example it would be very edifying...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Walt Disney’s Creative Organization Chart</title><link>http://www.atissuejournal.com/2009/08/walt-disney%e2%80%99s-creative-organization-chart/#comment-25347888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This chart's about 20 years too early for any theme park divisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This org chart is sortof a testament to how simple Disney's business was in the 40s.  They didn't have Buena Vista or any distribution operation at all (they shipped through Columbia at the time).  There was no TV, no cable networks, no home entertainment divisions, no record labels.  It's all a neat little package where stories go in one end and shorts and the occasional feature pop out the other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are also some pretty big elisions, like "Production Control" and "Army-Navy relations" being so small, when in fact the first was Roy's fiefdom and the second represented about half of Disney's business during the war years (if you see animation in any World War II training/informational film, it was done at Disney).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note also, conspiracy buffs, that the management echelon has a "morgue."  I have a feeling this is some kind of terminology for something, but as a sometime Disney production employee, I've never heard it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:18:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/203199142#comment-18348071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bloody hell, tickets are $110 dollars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/141941227#comment-12717548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All people, places, and things are Marklar :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starvin%27_Marvin_in_Space" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starvin%27_Marvin_in_Space"&gt;http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Computer Needs a Home</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/112899902#comment-11655082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only intel macs run Snowy Leopard I'm sorry to say, so this guy won't  &lt;br&gt;cut it in that department.  It would be much faster than your iMac,  &lt;br&gt;but it's pinky halfway to a modern mac.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/88049614#comment-7362997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm afraid of Roland Emmerich accusing me of bullshitting a scene.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/85726705#comment-7163448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not so much that he's a robot, or even that he's a Victorian  &lt;br&gt;robot, but to top it all off he's the Forrest Gump of Victorian robots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:18:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/80890788#comment-6533693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then again, someone mentioned in her comments that Ricardo Montalban was in the list yesterday, but died on the same day as McGoohan.  Hmm....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/74881745#comment-6070619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your meta-flame is powerless against my onslaught...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sigh</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/74719481#comment-5792415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/74394267#comment-5715251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe I should get a tour just so I can see Nicholas Cage's living room.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/73582537#comment-5605508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brains!?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/72632602#comment-5553706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope the bicycle-wheel version doesn't cost $14000 :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By iPhone/Par iPhone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprinkles of Genius, With a Chance of Doom</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/72015463#comment-5457715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beg pardon, &lt;br&gt;"G-d" is Jewish enough, I'm the pseudo ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling Mau!</title><link>http://chance-of-doom.tumblr.com/post/71680079#comment-5456356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, what number were you guys living in again?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamiehardt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>