<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of jameshicks</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jameshicks/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jameshicks/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:26:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 24 hours to go!!!!!!!</title><link>(u'http://tunisia.worldcupblog.org/group-h/24-hours-to-go-2.html',%2048782941L)#comment-48782941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check this out! The football fans affect on the results of their football teams &lt;a href="http://www.voodoo4football.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.voodoo4football.com"&gt;http://www.voodoo4football.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It turns out, that one who has more fans - he will win? Or those one - who has a lot of money? Let's get join them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Company Stages &amp;#8211; Revisted</title><link>(u'http://feld.com/archives/2006/11/company-stages-revisted.html',%2095447029L)#comment-95447029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would love to hear your ideas around how this process changes if it's bootstrapped versus venture-backed. Maybe worthy of a third post on the topic?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:07:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Buys Contest Site Bix, But Why?</title><link>(u'http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/11/yahoo-buys-contest-site-bix-but-why.html',%209409947L)#comment-9409947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a pretty good sense of why they did the acquisition, for a number of reasons. Basically one hot area in brand advertising (where Yahoo makes a ton of money, and Google does not) is the idea of "brand integration" - i.e., having microsites and feautres within the portal where people participate in sponsored advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So it's very clear to me that Bix is a great platform for Yahoo to run contests with their community, and leverage their advertising relationships to create more brand ad inventory for their network. That way, they can give users something fun while making it very easy to monetize. Think of contests like, "Sing a song about your car" and other ad-friendly concepts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m Really Tired of Alexa</title><link>(u'http://feld.com/archives/2006/11/im-really-tired-of-alexa.html',%2095447529L)#comment-95447529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At Revenue Science (which is an online ad company), we use Alexa but take the numbers with a grain of salt. You really have to compare it against comScore and Nielsen to see how off things can be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, here's some more detail on the issue:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2006/11/are_you_misusin.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2006/11/are_you_misusin.html"&gt;http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2006/11/are_you_misusin.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The summary is that:&lt;br&gt;- Alexa doesn't give concrete metrics like pageviews or uniques, just "rank"&lt;br&gt;- Alexa has a biased sample (which can be too small)&lt;br&gt;- Alexa gives false certainty&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check out the article above for more details.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:07:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PhotoBucket Back on MySpace (I Want To Know The Backstory)</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2007/04/24/photobucket-back-on-myspace-i-want-to-know-the-backstory/',%2072036937L)#comment-72036937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi guys,&lt;br&gt;Here's an analysis on what might become a stable situation in the widget world, where widgets are the new ad network:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2007/04/widgets_ad_netw.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2007/04/widgets_ad_netw.html"&gt;http://andrewchen.typepad.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to fool VCs into thinking you have traction, Part 4</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.co/2007/06/12/how-to-fool-vcs-into-thinking-you-have-traction-part-4/',%201843294L)#comment-1843294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd encourage you to read the rest of the series, particularly the intro :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact, I work at a VC and the different techniques I'm laying out are in fact things that people should watch for.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The fake accounts thing is not far off from what people do in dating sites and social networks which set up really attractive members to woo people to sign up. I think any smart investor should know how to dig into the company enough to understand what's going on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best new blogger I have found recently</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/23/best-new-blogger-i-have-found-recently/',%209696773L)#comment-9696773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link! ;-) I put up my best stuff on the leftside bar... enjoy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big exits for New York consumer internet startups?</title><link>(u'http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/01/05/big-exits-for-new-york-consumer-internet-startups/',%201843474L)#comment-1843474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm I know of Quigo, but it's not consumer internet - Quigo's an ad network. (By that count, Tacoda/Quigo/DCLK/etc are all winners..)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm just looking for straight consumer internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Follow Up to Andrew Chen&amp;#8217;s Good Post on Facebook Developers &amp;#8211; It&amp;#8217;s Mostly about Being Famous</title><link>(u'http://www.charleshudson.net/follow-up-to-andrew-chens-good-post-on-facebook-developers-its-mostly-about-being-famous',%203699787L)#comment-3699787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post! I agree with the idea that SF tech people are all about attention whoring ;-) and that the best ones receive value in return! haha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where are all the video startups? Maybe Content=King, online and offline</title><link>(u'http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/06/17/where-are-all-the-video-startups-maybe-contentking-online-and-offline/',%201843838L)#comment-1843838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It actually looks like it's not the sum - I think people just end up watching a bunch of different videos from sites on this list and off this list, and it aggregates into 80+. From the article: "Nearly 135 million U.S. Internet users watched an average of 82 videos per viewer in April. Google Sites also attracted the most viewers (83.7 million), where they watched an average of 50 videos per person. Fox Interactive attracted the second most viewers (52 million), followed by Yahoo! Sites (37.3 million) and Microsoft Sites (29.9 million)."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hello world! (from Disqus)</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/hello-world-from-disqus.html',%201007331L)#comment-1007331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sigh, already a problem... i had to convert my typepad to "advanced templates" and it removed all my typepad widgets I had lovingly installed. Sad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hello world! (from Disqus)</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/hello-world-from-disqus.html',%201007351L)#comment-1007351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;at least i got my subscriber counter and lijit search back up... will have to work on the other stuff tomorrow. Typepad = POS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google AdSense FAIL</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/google-adsense-fail.html',%201038158L)#comment-1038158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes me think there should be an entire website dedicated to funny website-to-ad matches. Sounds like a good project for the Icanhazcheezburger guys ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google AdSense FAIL</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/google-adsense-fail.html',%201038160L)#comment-1038160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;do you have a screenshot?? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:24:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: omg I'm just a startup, I can't do those fancy analytics!</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/omg-im-just-a-startup-i-cant-do-those-fancy-analytics.html',%201038173L)#comment-1038173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;albert, nice website plug ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:25:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hello world! (from Disqus)</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/hello-world-from-disqus.html',%201038204L)#comment-1038204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, the integration is not that great. I keep seeing scrollbars for all the IFRAMEs, for example. And the SEO stuff is definitely a concern, given that Google is my #2 referrer. We'll see how it goes ;-) Please feel free to share your experience as well, once you're a bit further along.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AdAge article on agency perspectives of online versus traditional advertising</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/adage-article-on-agency-perspectives-of-online-versus-traditional-advertising.html',%201042081L)#comment-1042081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These guys do stuff like buy the front page of Yahoo, etc. These are where the real budgets come from - who else has the ability to spend hundreds of thousands of bucks online?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously the datapoint for Unilever, as a consumer packaged goods company, is going to be really different than folks in auto, etc. But the case remains the same (and you can see this in other data) that online remains a small part of F500 companies' budget, with some more enthusiastically embracing it compared to others&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:47:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: omg I'm just a startup, I can't do those fancy analytics!</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/omg-im-just-a-startup-i-cant-do-those-fancy-analytics.html',%201050804L)#comment-1050804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great points, and good idea for how to step into analytics... I think you can generally go through a couple steps, from most lazy:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) keep a row in a flat file log (or DB) which you use grep and wc to count, or select queries in the latter case&lt;br&gt;2) write a script file that runs a multi-query report and spits it out into a flat file&lt;br&gt;3) same as #2, but hook it up into a web page&lt;br&gt;4) then the final option is to check it into your codebase and integrate it with the live site, so the queries can be pulled in real time&lt;br&gt;5) after that, then you set up a slave DB and run it on a separate machine so that your queries don't overload the main server&lt;br&gt;....&lt;br&gt;100) run hadoop/cassandra/etc and write all your queries in mapreduce format ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:27:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: omg I'm just a startup, I can't do those fancy analytics!</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/omg-im-just-a-startup-i-cant-do-those-fancy-analytics.html',%201054616L)#comment-1054616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to add that Rajat's advice is great, particularly for ecommerce. Anyone looking at stats would be well-served to read the above comment and apply it to their particular industry. Obviously some social media metrics would be different, but I agree with the general premise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 50+ essays on viral marketing, social network monetization, product design and more</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/07/full-directory-of-essays-on-viral-marketing-social-network-monetization-product-design-etc.html',%201084419L)#comment-1084419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks! And it was good to see you at S2S. Until next time... -A&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick link - NYT article on a "wow" product</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/08/quick-link---nyt-article-on-a-wow-product.html',%201088368L)#comment-1088368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ah, that is awesome. Thanks for the pointer! I just subscribed to my neighborhood.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results for user acquisition: Viral, SEO, word-of-mouth, or other?</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/08/poll-results-for-user-acquisition-viral-seo-word-of-mouth-or-other.html',%201095728L)#comment-1095728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;got it. Plus I think B2B's are different... you can focus on serving thousands of customers, and it's not as important to figure out how to scale into millions of people!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results for user acquisition: Viral, SEO, word-of-mouth, or other?</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/08/poll-results-for-user-acquisition-viral-seo-word-of-mouth-or-other.html',%201095746L)#comment-1095746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice to meet you Andrew! I think I figured that most of the folks reading my blog are B2C folks, whereas all the B2B people are off reading something with fewer pictures of lolcats and myspace celebs floating around ;-) But perhaps I'm assuming incorrectly&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results for user acquisition: Viral, SEO, word-of-mouth, or other?</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/08/poll-results-for-user-acquisition-viral-seo-word-of-mouth-or-other.html',%201129035L)#comment-1129035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i don't know if you can rank the effectiveness of these techniques against each other - too much apples to oranges. I tend to go for scaleable techniques that don't cost any money. In general, only viral, widgets and SEO fall into this camp (which explains why they have all gotten so much attention). I'm pretty anti-blog, PR, techcrunch, etc. as a sole strategy for gaining traction.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results for user acquisition: Viral, SEO, word-of-mouth, or other?</title><link>(u'http://andrewchen.typepad.com/andrew_chens_blog/2008/08/poll-results-for-user-acquisition-viral-seo-word-of-mouth-or-other.html',%201129084L)#comment-1129084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i like that distinction, and agree that some efforts are more time intensive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact, I'd also add that they take time from specific types of employees - viral and SEO are typically more engineering centric whereas PR/blog outreach can be facilitated by nontechincal types&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>