<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jacomen</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jacomen/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jacomen/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:53:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Article 450: Transformers and Transformer Vaults</title><link>http://ecmweb.com/mag/electric_article_transformers_transformer/#comment-1880405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding primary only protection, using a CB rated at 125% of the primary current will probably lead to CB tripping due to the inrush current. If the application is sensitive to nuisanse tripping, it would not be advisable to use a CB. Instead, a dual-element time delay fuse is the right choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jacob Mendelovici&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacomen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Article 450: Transformers and Transformer Vaults</title><link>http://ecmweb.com/mag/electric_article_transformers_transformer/#comment-1880395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding primary only protection, using a CB rated at 125% of the primary current will probably lead to CB tripping due to the inrush current. If the application is sensitive to nuisanse tripping, it would not be advisable to use a CB. Instead, a dual-element time delay fuse is the right choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jacob Mendelovici&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacomen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>