http://disqus.com/by/jackmehoof/enWed, 05 Aug 2009 11:19:02 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/08/02/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-02-august-2009/#comment-13980576<p>Yawn. </p>jackmehoofWed, 05 Aug 2009 11:19:02 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/26/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-26-july-2009/#comment-13655771<p>Yeah, he comes' straight at 'em like a SPIDER MONKEY! </p>jackmehoofThu, 30 Jul 2009 08:48:21 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/28/like-an-annoying-fly/#comment-13528230<p>And if DeKort even had a case, he wouldn't be coming to this or other blogs begging for people to "come forward" with information. </p>jackmehoofWed, 29 Jul 2009 07:10:38 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/28/like-an-annoying-fly/#comment-13528081<p>Stinson has to go out on a limb because he is personally invested in DeKort's bogus claims. He "heard it from a guy at the train station" and helped give the man a platform for months. The same thing with the Ruggierio case...he bought in hook, line, and sinker promoted her lies, and then it blew up in his and her face. I guess I must have missed his retraction on that one.</p><p>The truth is out on Deepwater, the problems addressed, and it's time to move on. This stuff is ancient history. </p>jackmehoofWed, 29 Jul 2009 07:00:18 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/26/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-26-july-2009/#comment-13461410<p>Actually, I'm enjoying the hell out watching you get smacked down at every turn. It won't be long until this case is dismissed and NSC2 is setting sail with full Tempest approval from CWO Porter.</p><p>And along the way, you got it wrong....again. I've been in and around the CG my entire adult life and have done more good for the service and this country than you can ever imagine doing.</p><p>I don't attack for the sake of attacking. I attack because you are a bitter, vindictive man who just won't let go. Care to tell us why you didn't release your YouTube video until after you found out you were going to be laid off? Care to tell us why you were bounced from several projects because you were unable to work with people? Sounds like sour grapes and a bad attitude to me.</p><p>And really, you say that "congress agreed with them" like that is supposed to mean something. The same group with a 9% approval rating? Hah! If they agreed so much with your baseless accusations, why aren't they taking action? Why are you left to file your own lawsuit with some hack attorney from Texas? Like I said before, I can't wait for LMCO attorneys to chew you up and spit you out....again. This is great theatre. </p>jackmehoofTue, 28 Jul 2009 13:49:10 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/26/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-26-july-2009/#comment-13446208<p>What about the Surface Effect Ships? The hydroplanes that vibrated so much that it caused kidney problems for the crew? I remember one being up on blocks at Station Bristol, RI back in the 80's. So the CG occasionally buys lemons....big shocker. </p>jackmehoofTue, 28 Jul 2009 10:34:53 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/26/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-26-july-2009/#comment-13443619<p>Call a Wahhhhmbulance Mike. And spare us your righteous indignation. The CG was never going to see the 123 refund and nothing that you have said or done is going to change that. Chalk it up as the cost of doing business with shady/incompetent government contractors.</p><p>Yeah, you're a real "profile in courage"....was all that "courage" worth the damage it did to your career, your family, your reputation? And what exactly did it accomplish? Just like DOJ, DHS, Congress, LMCO, we're tired of hearing you peddle your unsubstantiated and ridiculous accusations. You might want to revisit that story about the boy who cried wolf. </p>jackmehoofTue, 28 Jul 2009 09:15:45 -0000http://cgblog.org/2009/07/26/open-discussiondebate-for-the-week-of-26-july-2009/#comment-13400004<p>Nobody here cares about your obsessive vendetta...just go away. </p>jackmehoofMon, 27 Jul 2009 11:08:25 -0000