<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for irishtrojan</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/irishtrojan/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/irishtrojan/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 02:08:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Severe Thunderstorms, Even a Tornado, Possible Friday</title><link>https://www.weather5280.com/blog/2015/04/17/severe-thunderstorms-even-a-tornado-possible-friday/#comment-1973879142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the confusion arises essentially from the intended definition of the word "problem" in this context. I think you're interpreting "helicity shouldn't be problem" as meaning "there won't be enough helicity to cause problems [for human beings in the path of tornadoes]," whereas I think Matt means "there *will* be helicity, so the *tornadoes* won't have any problems with [the amount of] helicity." Matt is talking like a true excited meteorologist/weather nerd/storm chaser, thinking about "problems" from the perspective of the tornadoes. :) So a "problem" is a thing that would prevent tornadoes from forming, in which case "[the amount of] helicity shouldn't be a problem" means that inadequate helicity will not pose an obstacle to the potential for tornadoes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2015 02:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/24407035457</title><link>http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/24407035457#comment-547036349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha.  Not really.  I've had this Tumblr for a while, but as you can see, it's pretty dormant, and I don't intend to start using it more right now. I was actually testing some systems related to a private family/friends blog (though this, obviously, is not that blog).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Herman Cain: Untenable Positions</title><link>http://melissablogs.com/2011/11/07/herman-cain-untenable-positions/#comment-357984322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was with you right up until the point where you grossly generalized that "the Occupy Wall Street folks...believe that anything is fair game...[including] raping." Really? You honestly believe, because certain specific human beings have committed horrible crimes over the course of a couple months of thousands of human beings engaging in 24/7 "occupation," that the average OWS protester believes that "raping" is "fair game"? You can't think that, and it's beneath you to say it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You say you "haven’t been part of the conservative blogosphere six years to become the very thing I hate"? Well, you just became the "OMG TEA PARTY IS RACIST BECAUSE I SAW A PICTURE OF A GUY WITH A RACIST SIGN" crowd. Except worse, because accusing someone of being racist -- while a very serious charge, and an awful one to throw around lightly -- isn't nearly as bad as accusing someone of believing rape to be a-okay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The statement that "the Occupy Wall Street folks...believe that anything is fair game...[including] raping" is grotesque, obviously wrong, utterly repugnant, and you should delete it from this otherwise admirable post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, this post is great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/5399626053</title><link>http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/5399626053#comment-201745425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not me, but DU Bally has created an exploratory committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/5168710014</title><link>http://brendanloy.tumblr.com/post/5168710014#comment-196574219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL... I suppose so. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 17:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy New Year!</title><link>http://photo.brendanloy.com/2009/01/happy-new-year.html#comment-5077002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, Sorry. I'm very bad with keeping up with Facebook requests :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post-election pics</title><link>http://photo.brendanloy.com/2008/11/post-election-pics.html#comment-3656750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, Nadine. I had no idea that could be searched online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, my Colorado law license is actually re-activated as of Friday. I saw them stamp the Status Change form with my own eyes. :) I guess the online database just hasn't been updated yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the good luck wishes! I wish I knew how to keep in touch with you. :) But anyway, best of luck to you too, and I hope to see you again if/when I restart the blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:01:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ash Blog Durbatulûk: So long, and thanks for all the fish</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-fish.html#comment-3647205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;test&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not like the others on the dollar bill :)</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081107214829#comment-3627039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Silly Andrew, all white people look alike. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dave Barry: "the CNN hologram is the single stupidest thing I have ever seen on TV, and I am including Carrot Top in that statement"</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081107215034#comment-3618729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nor an actual thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/nerdiest-thing-ever.html</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/nerdiest-thing-ever.html#comment-3580722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today: the Reid-Lieberman smackdown!</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081106101030#comment-3579067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;President-elect Obama, who was criticized by Lieberman for being the "Hamas-endorsed" candidate, is going to endorse Lieberman to be ambassador to Israel?? LOL! That would be something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aside from the various inherent problems, another issue with any Lieberman appointment is that it wouldn't make the Senate situation better; it would make it worse, because Connecticut's governor is a Republican, she gets to appoint a senator to fill a vacancy, and CT has no special-election law for vacant Senate seats, so you'd be creating a Republican Senate seat for 4 years (instead of a quasi-Democrat, quasi-Republican, or whatever you want to consider Lieberman).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, hmm... I hear Chris Shays needs a job!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Convicted felon Ted Stevens leads Alaska Senate race by narrow margin</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081105130639#comment-3571615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I don't necessarily think there's anything wrong with Palin as governor, I fail to see how her sky-high approval rating proves anything... unless you're willing to concede that Bush's historically low approval rating proves he's a complete failure as president.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Popularity is one thing; good governance is another. Sometimes what's right isn't popular, and sometimes what's popular isn't right. This may or may not be the case with Palin (or with Bush), but you seem to be asserting that her 80% approval rating necessarily proves something, and that's just not true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, it's easy to have a high approval rating when you're taking money from oil companies and handing it out to every man, woman and child in your state. *cough*socialism*cough*spreadthewealth*cough*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again... not saying there's anything wrong with that, or with Palin, but the mere fact that it makes her popular doesn't prove that she isn't an embarrassment to the state. You need better evidence than that if you want to refute David's point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/obama-vs-kerry-by-county.html</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/obama-vs-kerry-by-county.html#comment-3571386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually think Andrew is basically right, Dane.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nate Silver's Election Night Viewers Guide</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081104014255#comment-3469580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm posting this a comment here, so I can find the link later:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last year, &lt;a href="http://www.brendanloy.com/wp/2004/11/015506.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.brendanloy.com/wp/2004/11/015506.html"&gt;the networks did not immediately call&lt;/a&gt; Virginia or South Carolina. Bush ultimately won Virginia by 8 and South Carolina by 18. This is just something to keep in mind if the networks OMG DON'T CALL KENTUCKY RIGHT AWAY!!!! or whatever. Sometimes they just don't have enough solid information to go on, don't trust their exit polls in a particular state, etc.; "too early to call" and "too close to call" aren't the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hold on to that feelin'...</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/hold-on-to-that-feelin.html#comment-3468573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I turned on C-SPAN hoping to catch Dixville Notch, and they weren't showing it. I didn't even bother to check another channel. Dammit! I can't believe I missed Dixville Notch!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:48:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hold on to that feelin'...</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/hold-on-to-that-feelin.html#comment-3468305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL. Not quite yet....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Final reminder</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/final-reminder.html#comment-3459163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can get exit poll data???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Er, anyway, the deadline isn't when the first polls close because I need time to do some final tinkering with my spreadsheet and make sure everything is working right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:49:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are we going to see Sarah Palin this afternoon? You betcha!</title><link>http://www.brendanloy.com/linkwalla/item-detail.php?id=20081103083540#comment-3459060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you &lt;i&gt;seen&lt;/i&gt; how cute our baby is? ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:43:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/usc-vs-texas-in-fiesta-bowl.html</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/usc-vs-texas-in-fiesta-bowl.html#comment-3455885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GOOOO IRISH, BEEEEAT TURTLES!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electoral College Contest: check your picks!</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/electoral-college-contest-check-your.html#comment-3450061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But of course! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: College football Week 10</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/college-football-week-10.html#comment-3444891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was feeling like crap and went to bed early in the fourth quarter... stupid stomach flu!! Argh!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:53:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: College football Week 10</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/11/college-football-week-10.html#comment-3437095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I expect a double-digit UW win. Just based on the final scores, Wazzu is &lt;i&gt;historically&lt;/i&gt; bad. The only reason they have a win, whereas UW doesn't, is because they played a Division I-AA cupcake. But the Cougars are AWFUL.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:08:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It's all about the senators</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/10/its-all-about-senators.html#comment-3431613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't recognize him. It was obvious that a politician of some sort was in the house, but I had no idea initially who it was; I assumed maybe a local candidate of some sort, or a congressional candidate at most. Then I saw several people in his entourage wearing "INHOFE" buttons. So I took out my cell phone, went to Inhofe's Wikipedia page, zoomed in on the photo of him, looked over at the man standing a few yards away, looked back at the photo, and realized: yup, it's him!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/10/electoral-college-contest-reminder.html</title><link>http://theoneblog.brendanloy.com/2008/10/electoral-college-contest-reminder.html#comment-3427225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh. Well, yeah. But also, I wouldn't have thrown in the "Idiot" if not for the gratuitous insult to Becky. (Yes, saying that she "looks like me" is an insult in my book, heh.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">irishtrojan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:49:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>