<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for intellectuallycurious</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/intellectuallycurious/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/intellectuallycurious/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:53:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Oldest Bible (Codex Sinaiticus) Now Online</title><link>http://bahairants.com/oldest-bible-codex-sinaiticus-now-online-286.html#comment-13742443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever the reason, I am certain it isn't about maintaining authority.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intellectuallycurious</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:53:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Financial Scandal Rocks Italian Baha&amp;#8217;i Community</title><link>http://bahairants.com/financial-scandal-rocks-italian-bahai-community-209.html#comment-13404289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Last 2 posts above are Great, but Where would/will we be w/o criticism, questioning and at least a healthy mote of doubt?  I shudder to think... but I suppose there would be many more here challenging free-speech and press.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intellectuallycurious</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Individual Baha&amp;#8217;is Ignoring NSA Directive on Iran</title><link>http://bahairants.com/individual-bahais-ignoring-nsa-directive-on-iran-607.html#comment-13402551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read this entire and exhausting back and forth and explication of hypocrisy and failure to call a spade a spade (an unfortunate recurring theme that is worthy of its own post), and I think it is a useful episode to highlight an institutionalized pathology that we are all likely aware of:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Criticism is unacceptable.  There is something wrong with whomever is the critic.  There can be nothing wrong with whatever is the object of the criticism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So much for intellectual curiosity and independent investigation if it takes you to a divergent conclusion...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intellectuallycurious</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oldest Bible (Codex Sinaiticus) Now Online</title><link>http://bahairants.com/oldest-bible-codex-sinaiticus-now-online-286.html#comment-13315239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If misinterpretation occurs, then there will be discussion.  I wonder which will be more problematic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intellectuallycurious</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:22:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oldest Bible (Codex Sinaiticus) Now Online</title><link>http://bahairants.com/oldest-bible-codex-sinaiticus-now-online-286.html#comment-13221211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What reason could Possibly justify the fact that every primary source is not available, right now, to everyone who wishes to see it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sunshine is the greatest disinfectant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intellectuallycurious</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>