<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for inteldaily</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/inteldaily/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/inteldaily/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:19:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Guantanamo Detainee Deaths</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/13085/2009-12-14.html#comment-25849934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the regular comments, rev_dave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:19:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Depleted Uranium: Dead Babies in Iraq and Afghanistan Are No Joke</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/12341/2009-10-21.html#comment-23891949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys cool it... censored, whoever you are, if you have any reservations about the article...take it up with Dave Lindorff, he is well known author.. ok???  And read the disclaimer....dont hold the website responsible for everything.. there are people who agree and who don't... ok..this is a forum that is suppossed to foster positive exchanges between users.. and please refrain from using base language...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good news for now: Rhode Island Governor vetoes RFID ban on tracking students</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/178/ARTICLE/12649/2009-11-13.html#comment-22919607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was being very cynical and sarcastic.. &lt;br&gt;Had he not vetoed the bill, I would be extremely "dissappointed"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a nutshell, I am very much against the tracking of people..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ex-CIA agent confirms US ties with Jundullah</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/126/ARTICLE/12382/2009-10-26.html#comment-21029994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Address your concerns to Press TV please&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;secondly, here's one from prisonplanet..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.infowars.com/former-pakistan-general-us-supports-jundullah-terrorists-in-iran/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.infowars.com/former-pakistan-general-us-supports-jundullah-terrorists-in-iran/"&gt;Former Pakistan General: U.S. Supports Jundullah Terrorists in Iran&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fascism Watch: Oath Keepers and the BNP</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/12377/2009-10-23.html#comment-20965878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have taken appropriate action... and deleted the sentence in question&lt;br&gt;However, I will also edit your comment... b/c I cant allow name calling on &lt;a href="http://Inteldaily.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Inteldaily.com"&gt;Inteldaily.com&lt;/a&gt;... From now on, all comments, because of this incidient will be moderated. It is sad that people have forced an uncensored site to moderate comments..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 06:47:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Czech President Slams New World Order At UN Speech &amp; The Pope Hits Back</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/162/ARTICLE/11962/2009-09-26.html#comment-17641492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Comment. I don't like where this thread is going. I do have much to say on this, but forget about it. This guy has revealed himself for who he is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is the Defund Blackwater Act?</title><link>http://rebelreports.com/post/195879985#comment-17304775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hysterical? :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Inteldaily.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Inteldaily.com"&gt;Inteldaily.com&lt;/a&gt; does not use facebook :) and Twitter is not a good way of getting in touch with people, although it is a great way of following updates&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enjoy the link below&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FACEBOOK.COM: intelligence agencies' espionage site&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inteldaily.com/news/138/ARTICLE/11345/2009-07-26.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.inteldaily.com/news/138/ARTICLE/11345/2009-07-26.html"&gt;http://www.inteldaily.com/n...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is the Defund Blackwater Act?</title><link>http://rebelreports.com/post/195879985#comment-17300660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am the editor of The Intelligence Daily&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;how do I get in touch with you -- no email anywhere on your site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glenn Beck's Demagoguery, Right Wing Extremism, and Racism</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/11836/2009-09-16.html#comment-16715221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Intelligence Daily did cover the 2 million man march..&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Militarising space: The Fallujah fallacy</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/11777/2009-09-09.html#comment-16584763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you... perhaps you could send eric a card... he is a good writer :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U.S. Marines In The Caucasus As West Widens Afghan War</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/172/ARTICLE/11729/2009-09-04.html#comment-16180142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for that OPIT, but the page has been deleted. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blackwater founder implicated in murder</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/11464/2009-08-07.html#comment-14466870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are right, I actually fixed that ... but it did not show up in the comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It's Official -- The Era of Cheap Oil Is Over: Energy Department Changes Tune on Peak Oil</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/154/ARTICLE/10972/2009-06-12.html#comment-10834321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;please refer to &lt;a href="http://www.theoildrum.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theoildrum.com"&gt;http://www.theoildrum.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and &lt;a href="http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net"&gt;http://www.lifeaftertheoilc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Authors such as Matt Simmons, Colin Campbell, Michael Ruppert, Richard Heinberg have covered the issue of reserves in detail.. we know as fact there were just over 2 trillion barrels of oil to beging with, now there is 1 trillion left. All current alternative energy technology is a joke, and will never replace the importance of oil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At inteldaily I try to warn people that there will be no economic recovery, just perpetual economic contraction...you will SEE, I speak with 100% certainty -- based on facts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No time left for denial&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcement</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/174/ARTICLE/10378/2009-04-14.html#comment-8221623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the kind words... you are welcome to send in tips, articles, news links.. whatever you deem to be useful for &lt;a href="http://Inteldaily.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Inteldaily.com"&gt;Inteldaily.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Email is inteldaily (at) &lt;a href="http://gmail.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="gmail.com"&gt;gmail.com&lt;/a&gt; or editor (at) &lt;a href="http://inteldaily.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="inteldaily.com"&gt;inteldaily.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alex&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Of Pirates and Predators: Oh what a tangled web</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/117/ARTICLE/10373/2009-04-13.html#comment-8114800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The pirates are U.S. intel assets that are needed in the region for geopolitical reasons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US defense reform plan worrisome</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/178/ARTICLE/10317/2009-04-08.html#comment-7984437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is an error in fact in your article, "US defense reform plan&lt;br&gt;worrisome".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(&lt;a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=90799" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=90799"&gt;http://www.presstv.ir/detai...&lt;/a&gt;§ionid=3510203)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The article misrepresents what I have publicly said in the second&lt;br&gt;paragraph.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Army is not at odds with Secretary Gates' proposed 2010 defense&lt;br&gt;budget.  We are currently determining the impacts and considering the&lt;br&gt;way ahead relative to the guidance we received.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did state what is listed in your fourth paragraph, that it is&lt;br&gt;important that public discussion not get out in front of the important&lt;br&gt;work that still has to be done at the service level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As we develop a definitive Army way forward, it will be incorporated&lt;br&gt;into the overall budget that President Obama is expected to submit to&lt;br&gt;Congress in early May.  At that point, the Army will be able to more&lt;br&gt;broadly discuss the specific aspects of our resourcing decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I attempted to post this post to your Web site in the Comments block:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--------------&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your second paragraph completely misrepresents what I have publicly&lt;br&gt;said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Army is not at odds with Secretary Gates' proposed 2010 defense&lt;br&gt;budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will not publicly discuss the implications of the budget announcement&lt;br&gt;until after President Obama submits the overall budget to the U.S.&lt;br&gt;Congress in early May.  Then we will discuss the Army's way ahead with&lt;br&gt;the programs that were affected by the Fiscal Year 2010 budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lt. Col. Christopher Garver&lt;br&gt;U.S. Army Public Affairs&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:57:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: World Oil Production Peaked in 2008</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/154/ARTICLE/10096/2009-03-18.html#comment-7368760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;dogismyth: Inteldaily is on the side of those who believe oil peak in 2005 ... we published this piece to show our readers that even the skeptics are now coming on board.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mexico drug cartels buying public support</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/143/ARTICLE/10040/2009-03-13.html#comment-7210941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with much of what you say...but to also assume that drug lords have no say in that region is being a little too optimistic..dont you think..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People should actually be asking themselves who do these druglords work for, which governments are covertly supporting them??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Accused Iraqi Agent Reveals Facts about 9/11 Warning</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/173/ARTICLE/9936/2009-03-02.html#comment-6836185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are always welcome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 07:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dutch still wincing at Bush-era 'Invasion of The Hague Act'</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/178/ARTICLE/9699/2009-02-13.html#comment-6271913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you for the reply...we were pressing on the definition of sovereignty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why did you not quote this part of our comment above: Moreover, we have to try our own for war crimes; we have to come to terms as a country with what we have done; we have to raise awareness within the US population to all that has happened. Others cant do it for us. We can't outsource this one too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our position is very clear...no need to further digress from the point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dutch still wincing at Bush-era 'Invasion of The Hague Act'</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/178/ARTICLE/9699/2009-02-13.html#comment-6238380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The country in question is not Yugoslavia, but the United States of America.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our point is very simple...and this has to do with international politics/relations. If you have your soldier tried in another country, you are no longer a sovereign nation. That is the point we are trying to get across.  Our sovereignty supersedes everything else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moreover, we have to try our own for war crimes; we have to come to terms as a country with what we have done; we have to raise awareness within the US population to all that has happened. Others cant do it for us. We can't outsource this one too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:03:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dutch still wincing at Bush-era 'Invasion of The Hague Act'</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/178/ARTICLE/9699/2009-02-13.html#comment-6237509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Scott,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is Alex from inteldaily. I understand your point... I was refering to soldiers, and those in uniform (of the US)..not to politicians. sorry for the mix up.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top UK spy says credit crunch a security threat</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/126/ARTICLE/9190/2009-01-07.html#comment-6093886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;we are not here to feed you false hope.... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High-Level CIA Officer: It Is Time to Re-Open the 9/11 Investigation</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/126/ARTICLE/9582/2009-02-07.html#comment-6068465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it is all about peak oil! it is that simple.... :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Israel halts Lebanese ship carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza</title><link>http://www.inteldaily.com/news/148/ARTICLE/9559/2009-02-05.html#comment-6041761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;who do you work for? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">inteldaily</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>