<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for innov8r</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/innov8r/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/innov8r/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:09:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bank of Russia Issues Warning on Digital Currencies</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bank-of-russia-issues-warning/#comment-1260999509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right, they are a shareholder -- and a quite important one at that. Not to be too pedantic, but "Sberbank is owned by the Bank of Russia" IMHO implies a 100% ownership, which is untrue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:09:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SecondMarket to launch first U.S.-based Bitcoin exchange - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blogTerm Sheet</title><link>http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/02/25/secondmarket-bitcoin-exchange/#comment-1260994371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's monopoly money with controlled supply, ready convertibility and non-repudiation of transactions, among other things, so it's really not monopoly money at all, if you care to think about it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:00:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SecondMarket to launch first U.S.-based Bitcoin exchange - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blogTerm Sheet</title><link>http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/02/25/secondmarket-bitcoin-exchange/#comment-1260986327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;because they were under-regulated, not over-regulated&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bank of Russia Issues Warning on Digital Currencies</title><link>http://www.coindesk.com/bank-of-russia-issues-warning/#comment-1219620791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bank of Russia does not own Sberbank, as the article erroneously states.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://fredwilson.vc/post/41993488#comment-884399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Versailles is pre-release Peterhof.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to Launch Next Gen Blog Advertising Network?</title><link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/04/30/google-to-launch-next-gen-blog-advertising-network/#comment-400877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Main thing is that Google knows these things about you rather than the content itself. So you don't need a new ad network, you just use that data in the AdSense targeting algorithms as user profile. Why would a new blog advertising network be needed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: System and Organizational Scaling - Continuations</title><link>http://continuations.wenger.us/post/33100418#comment-387992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SOA is typically thought to be for the big boys, but you make an excellent point about service orientation for startups. I tend to think of this as component-based vs. monolithic architectures, rather than vertical vs. horizontal. A service then is just a type of component accessible via network.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Feygin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>