<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ianshepherd</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ianshepherd/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ianshepherd/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 08:04:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
          
            BBC Sound Problems Continue - Why?
          
        </title><link>http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/bbc-sound-problems-continue-why#comment-2720936185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I looked into some examples of this a couple of years ago, and I think EQ is also a factor. The dialogue is naturalistic and ambient - and in my experience that means a little dull and boomy. The roomy sound in particular I think doubles up with the crap sound of most TV sets, and when that gets played into a typical square living room with it's own resonances, you have a problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tried some very subtle presence lifts to get a little extra clarity out of the examples I tried, and it really helped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So in that respect, I do think this problem could be at least reduced at the mix stage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 08:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Production Secrets of The Beatles</title><link>http://theproaudiofiles.com/beatles-production-techniques/#comment-1580852401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post - for anyone who liked these ideas, there's a *great* documentary about the making of Sgt. Pepper, I posted it here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/the-making-of-sgt-pepper/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productionadvice.co.uk/the-making-of-sgt-pepper/"&gt;http://productionadvice.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enjoy !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:34:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SoundWorks Collection</title><link>http://soundworkscollection.com/news/how-to-master-a-song-loud-and-the-price-you-pay#comment-1463112950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reposting my content, I'm flattered you like it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't remember you asking permission, I don't usually allow complete reposts - but you've added a link so I guess that's OK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please add a "canonical" tag to your "Source" link as well as the YouTube link, so I have full credit for my content - and for any other of my posts you choose to reblog, please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For future reference, I think quoting short extracts and adding value with your own comments or experience is better than just copying and pasting the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 06:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Loudness Wars Behind Nine Inch Nails&amp;#039; New Album</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2013/08/loudness-wars-behind-nine-inch-nails-new-album/68838/#comment-1032181292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An even bigger shame is that the so-called "audiophile" version *isn't* very much more dynamic...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/"&gt;http://productionadvice.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:46:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nine Inch Nails: &amp;#039;Hesitation Marks&amp;#039; – Album Review</title><link>http://www.fearnet.com/news/review/nine-inch-nails-hesitation-marks-%E2%80%93-album-review#comment-1032176202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm. I wouldn't say the "audiophile" version has *much* wider dynamics...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/"&gt;http://productionadvice.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nine Inch Nails offering "Loud" and "Audiophile" versions of new album</title><link>http://www.audioprointernational.com/news/read/nine-inch-nails-offering-loud-and-audiophile-versions-of-new-album/06308#comment-1032174976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately it's only a *little bit* audiophile...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productionadvice.co.uk/nine-inch-nails/"&gt;http://productionadvice.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home Mastering: How to Convert Sample Rate</title><link>http://theproaudiofiles.com/convert-sample-rate-with-sample-manager/#comment-1011054718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally I would do the same thing when converting for production too. But Logic's conversion is pretty good, so I wouldn't agonise too much :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Home Mastering: How to Convert Sample Rate</title><link>http://theproaudiofiles.com/convert-sample-rate-with-sample-manager/#comment-1002986057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, I agree with Tapio. If this bothers you, I would use a different converter. In practise, you are unlikely to hear major problems - but as a mastering engineer I can't go with that :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Op Ed: What Do &amp;#8220;Mastered for iTunes&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Sound Check&amp;#8221; Do To Music Listening?</title><link>/2012/04/op-ed-what-do-mastered-for-itunes-and-sound-check-do-to-music-listening/#comment-486249306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a word - yes !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I posted an article back in 2009 that predicted that volume normalisation (Sound Check, Replaygain, Spotify etc) would eventually meant he end of the loudness war:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://recordproduction.com/blog/2009/10/how-spotify-will-end-the-loudness-wars/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://recordproduction.com/blog/2009/10/how-spotify-will-end-the-loudness-wars/"&gt;http://recordproduction.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And today this is even more true. Last year, the ITU agreed international standard methods of measuring loudness, and recommended guidelines for broadcast - these are being adopted and even becoming law already. So soon, you'll see the effects of this everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just posted a video demonstrating how it works, and some metering plugins to help you measure the effect on your own music, here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://productionadvice.co.uk/the-best-loudness-metering-plugins-money-can-buy/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://productionadvice.co.uk/the-best-loudness-metering-plugins-money-can-buy/"&gt;http://productionadvice.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't like the effect of this within an album, personally - I think sound check may be updated to solve this issue, and I hope Spotify will follow suit - and, there are questions about whether Simon and Garfunkel should be heard a the same average level as Meshuggah. But in fact, FM compression means this is how we've been hearing things for years, so I doubt there will be too many complaints.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's to the end of the loudness war !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Underworld &amp;#8211; Jumbo</title><link>http://funk.co.uk/music/underworld-jumbo/#comment-62975883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes yes yes ! This is THE Underworld track from Beaucoup Fish. One of my favourite festival moments ever was Glastonbury 2000, where in the break with all the lovely chords at 1'55" everything turned yellow...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another was at a festival in Brighton, during Rowla (a track I never understood until I heard it in a tent with 3000 other people, all of whom went mental at exactly the same moment, because Rick Smith twisted the knob on a resonant filter *just so*...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:02:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yesterday My Brain Popped</title><link>http://theothersideofeverything.com/flip/2009/06/yesterday-my-brain-popped/#comment-10733797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's how it reads though...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So are you saying, rather than doing the things on your list, you are now choosing to do what you really want to ? And, if some futile internet dribbling takes place along the way, so be it but let's keep it to a minimum ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Edits reply to edited reply :-D]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OK - I agree we're tiny fish. I'm comfortable with that, provided we're happy in what we do. The challenge of course is to make enough money to be able to carry on doing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you read Seth Godin's blog ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yesterday My Brain Popped</title><link>http://theothersideofeverything.com/flip/2009/06/yesterday-my-brain-popped/#comment-10733513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm. As a fellow internet addict I applaud your sentiments, but I can't help wondering if you're being a little black and white about things ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You've made enough money through the items in your list to be able to pursue your musical theatre idea for the next few months - would that have happened without also participating in the "constant draining dribble of futile hope" ? Was/is it ALL that pointless ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As someone who has a great deal of interest invested in the odd website, and in all the supposed benefits of the futile hope-draining possibilities, I'm curious !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:15:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top of this City</title><link>http://funk.co.uk/music/top-of-this-city/#comment-62975854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what I love about what @&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/skinnermike" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/skinnermike"&gt;skinnermike&lt;/a&gt;, @&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/imogenheap" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/imogenheap"&gt;imogenheap&lt;/a&gt; and others are doing - showing us how their music happens, *as* it happens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post Dean, and a top tune !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitterrific+Comes+Roaring+Back+Into+The+iPhone+Twitter+App%26nbsp%3BWars</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/08/twitterrific-comes-roaring-back-into-the-iphone-twitter-app-wars/#comment-71602050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitterrific was my first iPhone Twitter client - I switched to Tweetie for the extra features and thought I preferred Twitterrific's interface. Now, T2 doesn't have any features to tempt me away and feels unnecessarily flashy compared to Tweetie...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:27:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angel</title><link>http://funk.co.uk/music/angel/#comment-62975842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotcha ! Took a couple of hours for my subconscious to process, trawling through all those Golden Years before the right tune popped into my head. Nicely done, sir !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In general relativity, bodies always follow... - Waiting for the Moon</title><link>http://tsparks.tumblr.com/post/92431342#comment-7985787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's confusing stuff :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good Advice from a Professional Copywriter - Waiting for the Moon</title><link>http://tsparks.tumblr.com/post/92939302#comment-7833894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you read &lt;a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.copyblogger.com/"&gt;CopyBlogger&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In general relativity, bodies always follow... - Waiting for the Moon</title><link>http://tsparks.tumblr.com/post/92431342#comment-7833865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But the 4th dimension is only time, not somewhere you can live. There are no higher beings in spacetime, just us. &lt;a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/557482/space-time" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/557482/space-time"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; almost certainly won't help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In general relativity, bodies always follow... - Waiting for the Moon</title><link>http://tsparks.tumblr.com/post/92431342#comment-7786383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why ? Do you want a bendy 4th dimension path ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:24:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rise and Shine Album Release</title><link>http://funk.co.uk/music/rise-and-shine-album-release/#comment-62975832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Remixes, great idea - how about making a song or two available for anyone who fancies a go, maybe even a competition where the best one is a bonus track a la Imogen Heap ? &lt;a href="http://twurl.nl/2788vc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twurl.nl/2788vc"&gt;http://twurl.nl/2788vc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Retweets Welcome</title><link>http://davefleet.com/blog/2009/03/18/retweets/#comment-89553785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think he also misses some other points:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Tweets get indexed by Google, so they *are* permanent, arguably in perhaps the most important way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Many people follow only a small (&amp;lt;100) number of accounts, and read ALL the tweets in their stream. So they will read a tweet even if they're offline most of the day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- If someone who follows a large number of people retweets, it means they've selected your content from a very large pool. Given the volume of links per day, someone taking the time to select your material IS a complement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I disagree with him too :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:30:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Faryl and &amp;#8216;The Fearless Blogger&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/introducing-faryl-and-the-fearless-blogger/#comment-9446896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff, Faryl is one of my favourite twitter friends - highly recommended !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Grammy Award Production Winners</title><link>http://mixonline.com/news/grammy_production_winners_0902/#comment-6172891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://mastering-media.blogspot.com/2009/02/why-rick-rubin-deserves-his-producer-of.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mastering-media.blogspot.com/2009/02/why-rick-rubin-deserves-his-producer-of.html"&gt;Does Rick Rubin Deserve the "Producer Of The Year" Grammy Award ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Blog post, interested to hear people's comments)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Someone said that tweets &amp;quot;fade away&amp;quot; eventually - is this true ? #lazytweet</title><link>http://www.lazytweet.com/post/1097740977#comment-4958287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I'll give it a shot&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Someone said that tweets &amp;quot;fade away&amp;quot; eventually - is this true ? #lazytweet</title><link>http://www.lazytweet.com/post/1097740977#comment-4931877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that - any guides to using tumblr or &lt;a href="http://soup.io" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="soup.io"&gt;soup.io&lt;/a&gt; in the way you describe ? Mainly I'd like to just archive the links&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ianshepherd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>