<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for iand</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/iand/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/iand/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:08:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wakinh Up</title><link>http://https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4764922/static_web_site/2015/03/02/Waking-Up.html#comment-1885924075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another explanation might be that you wake partially many times during the night but none of them are memorable, except the times you wake up just before the alarm. Your brain registers that this is an exceptional situation and wakes you fully.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jock&amp;#039;s Jottings?</title><link>http://jockcoats.me/node/4945#comment-1739609433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to whatever you write. This blog has been far too quiet for far too long :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Learning from the Electoral Commission - James Smith</title><link>http://floppy.org.uk/blog/2014/07/07/learning-from-the-electoral-commission/#comment-1472219754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It makes you wonder if a crowdfunding service that explicitly dealt with confirming that donors are on the electoral roll would enable more independents to stand. Extending from that, perhaps there's room for a site that provides all the organisation and crowdfunding infrastructure for independents. Kind of like a blend of JustGiving and BaseCamp&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:09:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Same Old Amazon: All Sales, No Profit</title><link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/same-old-amazon-all-sales-no-profit#comment-1096437056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're missing the point. When Amazon stops spending everything on expansion, they'll make massive profits. Walmart did the same - Sam Walton borrowed like crazy to expand and did so until he had driven away most other competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Same Old Amazon: All Sales, No Profit</title><link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/same-old-amazon-all-sales-no-profit#comment-1096102132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is exactly how Walmart grew in the 60's: low prices and leverage to expand vigourously&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 04:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Questionable Argument for Paternalistic Legislation</title><link>http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/04/a-questionable-argument-for-paternalistic-legislation/#comment-854837562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about this argument: by cycling without a helmet you are greatly increasing the chances that after an accident the other party will have to live with the fact that they killed you. This holds no matter whose fault the accident was. Seen this way the lack of helmet is a form of negative externality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 03:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s important not to worship any hero wholesale</title><link>http://dorkitude.com/post/41267859215#comment-775529592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"have the courage to follow your heart and intuition" doesn't mean do &lt;br&gt;things other people would approve of unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The paragraph you quote is rightly taken as a celebration of individuality and courage of &lt;br&gt;conviction and they are inspiring words. But the advice is missing any moderating factor such as whether your actions are harmful to other people or the world around you. Without that kind of moderation it becomes a terrible skewed moral compass to follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Communism, Anarchism, and Counter-Examples</title><link>http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2011/09/communism-anarchism-and-counter-examples/#comment-315164977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its possible that we haven't previously reached a level of wealth, education or technological advancement to make anarchism successful. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Clever Business Model</title><link>https://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/09/a-clever-business-model/#comment-305987560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When people ask what's your business model, they're not asking about pricing. They're asking who you're charging and why. Making more money than you spend just defines a business, not a model.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google TV to launch in UK</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8723947/Google-TV-to-launch-in-UK.html#comment-296050588</link><description>&lt;p&gt; "tele" implies you still haven't come to terms with this new fangled technology&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:05:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Forget Acquisitions: Apple control the Supply Lines</title><link>http://alexblom.com/2011/07/18/forget-acquisitions-apple-control-the-supply-lines/#comment-256959241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Companies are collectives so to my (Brit) mind I'm thinking about a group of people. Just replace Apple with "that group of people" to see how we think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:07:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Files Patent Suit Against Samsung Over Galaxy Line of Phones and Tablets</title><link>http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110418/apple-files-patent-suit-against-samsung-over-galaxy-line-of-phones-and-tablets/#comment-187150776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this because Apple are planning a 7-inch iPad and want to clear the way?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Understanding Google</title><link>http://www.theequitykicker.com/2011/04/04/understanding-google/#comment-177992933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, the whole reason for Google to get into the operating system, browser and spectrum arenas is a defensive play to counter threats from the iPhone and similar platforms. Google's strategy is predicated on universal access to the web so they need to avoid being mediated by the likes of Apple or network providers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dydra | Dydra Lifts Off</title><link>http://blog.dydra.com/2011/02/07/liftoff#comment-142500341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats on launching, data as a service is going to be hot this year :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paul Miller is bound for pastures new</title><link>https://cloudofdata.com/2008/12/paul-miller-is-bound-for-pastures-new/#comment-32468101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck Paul! (not that I think you'll need it - you're going to be in demand and we'll be battling for your time!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:21:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft closes the quarter with less cash than Apple</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/10/23/microsoft-closes-the-quarter-with-less-cash-than-apple/#comment-3277223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Erm, I meant to type $25B of course&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft closes the quarter with less cash than Apple</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/10/23/microsoft-closes-the-quarter-with-less-cash-than-apple/#comment-3277211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is keeping $35B in the bank a sound strategy in these times of unprecedented bank failures. The government isn't going to underwrite the entire economy. Why aren't they returning that cash to shareholders?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>