<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for i_like_trees</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/i_like_trees/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/i_like_trees/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:34:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest: BREAKING BAD returns 15 July on AMC</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2012/05/breaking-bad-returns-15-july-on-amc.html#comment-536144805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent news! These'll be the first episodes I've watched as they've aired, having caught up a few months ago.&lt;br&gt;Seems to be one of those shows which, like the Wire, seems to be picking up fans through the DVDs and mouth of word. I know a bunch of people who have started watching the show in the past year. Shame that, as you say, it's never been given a good timeslot in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'TV's greatest show' - Huge claim! I know you weren't too much of a Wire fan but you prefer to Mad Men then?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd love it if you one day did a 'top ten shows ever' feature or something. Obviously it's entirely subjective but I'd quite like to know yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest: MAD MEN, 5.9 – "Dark Shadows"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2012/05/mad-men-59-dark-shadows.html#comment-530760247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*thought Sally not telling Better about Don's angry reaction was a good touch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest: MAD MEN, 5.9 – "Dark Shadows"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2012/05/mad-men-59-dark-shadows.html#comment-530568910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha yeah it's hard to see anyone liking Betty, the writers have made her pretty unlikeable, and her story lines seem the weakest in the show to me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sally's becoming quite a good character - thought her Betty her mum about don's angry reaction was a good touch. Precocious but still.&lt;br&gt;And Bert is brilliant. The bit after he finds out Rodger is getting divorced, checks his watch and says 'already?'. Classic!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest: MAD MEN, 5.8 - "Lady Lazarus"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2012/05/mad-men-58-lady-lazarus.html#comment-527943715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Plus we've already had a car accident as a plot point in the first series (Unless that was foreshadowing..). Maybe they'll go really dark and Pete will turn his often-talked about gun on himself... but I doubt it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 13:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest: MAD MEN, 5.8 - "Lady Lazarus"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2012/05/mad-men-58-lady-lazarus.html#comment-526893312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah I read the lift as a representation of Don being disconnected from the young New York, and also generally being literally trapped in his job and it's routine. Kind of went hand in hand with Danny talking about the job being meaningless and time consuming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really brilliant episode I thought, probably my highlight of the season so far. And it was worth every penny of the reported 250k fee for tomorrow never knows at the end. Terrific.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can't see Pete dieing, there rarely tend to be deaths on MM, which makes a nice change for a big American drama. (Though its fairly likely I'll stand corrected on that!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LOST 6.11 - "Happily Ever After"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/lost-611-happily-ever-after.html#comment-44243882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Kinda odd that the best episodes of Lost (Like this one and the Dessy one from s4) can sometimes focus only on the more minor characters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyhoo, glad to see Dessy back and having a good role in things. Lost back on track for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the Blog: TV overload, secret news, and more</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/state-of-blog-tv-overload-secret-news.html#comment-43864406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeaah get the Lost ones out earlier I reckon. The kinds of people still bothering to watch it are the kinds of people who download it anyway I reckon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And likewise, I had no idea the font had changed haha.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a side note, I caught up with FF the other day... swear I must be the only person on the planet still enjoying it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LOST 6.10 - "The Package"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/04/lost-610-package.html#comment-43092283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with the above. Come on Lost!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LOST 6.9 – "Ab Aeterno"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/lost-69-ab-aeterno.html#comment-42270384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very much the marmite episode. Everyone seems to love or hate it. Apart from me who is indifferent. For such a much-hyped episode (We've been waiting for an Alpart episode since he first appeared) it was, as you say, more than a little predictable. I wasn't even that amazed by Carbonell's performance, though it was probably just Alpart's character, who came off pretty weak and easily influenced, instead of the badass I thought he was. Well anyway, with that many awnsers you can't really complain I guess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good point about the whole cabin-ash-circle-thing, forgot about that completely! Hope they address it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TRAILER PARK: Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/trailer-park-scott-pilgrim-vs-world.html#comment-41612048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks so SO good.. gloriously geeky, and the impressions from test screenings have apparently been good.. excited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, hope you've seen videos of the Spaced flash mob the other week... looked brilliant&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan's Media Digest is 4 years old today!</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/dans-media-digest-is-4-years-old-today.html#comment-40718910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Birthday DMD, keep it up and all that jazz!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SKINS 4.8</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/skins-48.html#comment-40717392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I think they tried to justify it by Pandora sneaking in the line 'I may have taken a couple of extra exams' or something, but it was pretty unconvincing.. their whole ending was pretty silly as you say.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Haha likewise, I'm toward the older end... every series that passes and I'm starting to feel weird watching it! A new cast is very much needed yeah, I'm sure the newly-watching 15 year olds and whatnot are bound to enjoy it regardless&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:42:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FlashForward's back... will you be?</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/flashforwards-back-will-you-be.html#comment-40436251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say, I actually enjoyed FF more than I've been enjoying s6 of Lost&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hatemehateme&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But ye. Excited. Need my mac to start working again first though. But most of all I'm excited at the prospect of James Callis..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Competition: win a copy of ZOMBIELAND!</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/competition-win-copy-of-zombieland.html#comment-38844060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am going to get around to entering this time. I am.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oscars 2010: The Results</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/oscars-2010-results.html#comment-38603690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did have a fairly poor seat - middle of the cinema but right at the side - but the friend who I went with, who was sitting next to me, had no problems so I don't think it was that. Would have been interesting to see if sitting in the middle would have helped though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And faair enough.. tHL is the kind of film that I'll probably never actually get round to watching, partly merely because it's an army sort of film (I think) which doesn't particularly interest me. Eager to see Up before I get it spoiled though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a random note, having sat through the whole thing it really was a surprise to see Hurt Locker take it - there was so many digs at Avatar through the ceremony that I thought they'd have to give it best picture to make up for it. But alas! Cameron can't have been thrilled..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oscars 2010: The Results</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/oscars-2010-results.html#comment-38591730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's hardly emporer's new clothes as it's so fashionable to slate Avatar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, for me, for whatever reason the 3D didn't work - blurry and buggy - I'm slightly colourblind so think that could possibly be why. But yeah, still thought it was an OK film, even if the best part of it - the visuals - was largely lost on me. Nice to see it didn't take the Picture Oscar though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I stayed up and watched it all (had an essay to write and found a stream online so figured I may aswell) which was generally quite a massive waste of time, what with there being pretty much no surprises. + I had to tolerate Claudia Winkleman doing the Sky stuff inbetween..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should probably watch The Hurt Locker... and Up...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:29:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Face-Off: The Eggheads [Poll]</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/face-off-eggheads-poll.html#comment-38469511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Frack that, Faraday was for a while by far the best new character on the show. Voted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*dont actually watch Fringe mind&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:31:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm wired(eux)</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/03/im-wiredeux.html#comment-37871599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's definately true (although that said I don't think I've ever watched two episodes in a row, merely one per night) it's hard to see anyone sticking with it after the first few episodes of the first season; with no 'best show evaar' claims to keep people going.&lt;br&gt;Just started the third myself, which is looking good so far. I adored the second anyway, you're in for a treat! I advise watching with subtitles on, makes watching much easier I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LOST 6.1 &amp;amp; 6.2 - "LA X: Part 1 &amp;amp; 2"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/lost-61-62-la-x-part-1-2.html#comment-32865073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha yeah I was thinking that during that bit... speaking of which have their podcasts started again? Not a fan of the new itunes podcast pages...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LOST 6.1 &amp;amp; 6.2 - "LA X: Part 1 &amp;amp; 2"</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/lost-61-62-la-x-part-1-2.html#comment-32864913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'I'm assuming that it was one of Locke's knives that Ben used to kill Jacob???'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aye, I like that theory I do. Could be interesting to see if any of the other Losties lost anything on the flight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also interesting to think retrospectively back to Locke drawing pictures of the smoke monster when he was young. Foreshadowing I suppose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the chains - either metaphorical now that Jacob's dead or, more likely, Black Rock&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Sayid, I heard a theory somewhere that Sayid being brought back to life might have some sort of reprocussion on his life in the other timeline.  Exciting episode in any case!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:44:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FlashForward: Goyer's gone</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/flashforward-goyers-gone.html#comment-32830523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah I see, thanks, I figured it would be something like that (Assuming you meant that cable shows are cost less)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FlashForward: Goyer's gone</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/flashforward-goyers-gone.html#comment-32800711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meh, I'll still watch it until it dies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing that I've never understood about American shows is the ratings... I mean, BSG, if I recall, never had more than a couple million viewers and yet it must have been roughly as big a budget as flashforward and other such dramas are...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsbite: Brit gets True Blood; Human Target drops; Merlin on Syfy; Caprica ratings</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/newsbite-brit-gets-true-blood-human.html#comment-32738447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to clarify, these aren't reasons I'm not watching - I am and think it could be pretty good. Just what I'm gathering from reading io9, home of the ultimate sci fi fanboys&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:46:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsbite: Brit gets True Blood; Human Target drops; Merlin on Syfy; Caprica ratings</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/newsbite-brit-gets-true-blood-human.html#comment-32732529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mainly the ridiculous fans, reasons I've heard include&lt;br&gt;- boycotting all things BSG as a result of the series finale not explaining absolutely everything&lt;br&gt;- The focus on family drama as opposed to sci fi battles and such&lt;br&gt;- being disappointed to find that the cylons originated out of an angsty teenager&lt;br&gt;+ Probably other silly reasons&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newsbite: Brit gets True Blood; Human Target drops; Merlin on Syfy; Caprica ratings</title><link>http://danowen.blogspot.com/2010/02/newsbite-brit-gets-true-blood-human.html#comment-32724898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there's probably a good few BSG who aren't watching Caprica on principle, which is a shame considering it's pretty good as a stand alone series. 1.4 million isn't awful anyhow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, Dan, I emailed you this week's Skins review, just making sure you got it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">i_like_trees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>