<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for hiero2</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/hiero2/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/hiero2/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:08:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Which one would you hit? Maliah Michel or Miracle | Bossip</title><link>http://bossip.com/662942/which-one-would-you-hit-maliah-michel-vs-miracle-43081/#comment-694335986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bootay. My heavens, bootay-licious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technical FAQ: Follow-up on Shimano shifters</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/08/bikes-tech/technical-faq-follow-up-on-shimano-shifters_135513#comment-69563353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would expect to use a purchased set for AT LEAST 5 years - a 2 year warranty seems wimpy. Keep in mind, I'm not talking about a guarantee, I'm talking about some sort of replacement value for a failure that would be regarded as unreasonable - for at least a 5 year period. I don't like a "buy it and throw it away, buy another" kind of thinking. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Garmin team&amp;#8217;s management says its riders must cooperate with Landis investigation</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/05/news/garmin-teams-management-says-its-riders-are-free-to-cooperate-with-landis-investigation_118885#comment-52709039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't agree. It struck me, since very soon after Landis got "caught", starting with his first "story change", that he had started lying. Landis comes from an extremely religious family, and while he decided to live his life outside that, he was still known, I believe, previously, as a real straight-shooter. None of this picture "smelled" right - until this latest confession. However, it also seems apparent to me that Floyd has become a bitter man. It is almost certain, and I think is typical of cases where one person decides to "crash-and-burn" out of bitterness, that while what he is saying is all true, it will also try to "point fingers" where possible. In other words, we need to take the Floyd's revelations with a little salt. I still think this is the truest revelation of dopage to come out today. In 6 months to a year from now, I believe we will all know much more than we did yesterday. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Garmin team&amp;#8217;s management says its riders must cooperate with Landis investigation</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/05/news/garmin-teams-management-says-its-riders-are-free-to-cooperate-with-landis-investigation_118885#comment-52704804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@birillothedog: brilliant. I quite agree. One exception tho - there may be no omerta on Garmin, but there does appear to be forgiveness. My optimism that we now have a drug-free peloton, or at least that the influence of doping is greatly reduced, is also much higher now than it was before Landis has added this confession. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Garmin team&amp;#8217;s management says its riders must cooperate with Landis investigation</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/05/news/garmin-teams-management-says-its-riders-are-free-to-cooperate-with-landis-investigation_118885#comment-52480290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bravo! Bravo! This is a wonderfully worded statement. What was -- was. Time to move forward. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zirbel&amp;#8217;s B sample positive</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/01/news/zirbels-b-sample-positive_103374#comment-32144245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, it's been said before, and many times, in many different ways: “The more familiar you are with DHEA and other illegal drugs, you know that DHEA is not something that anyone with half a brain would take, getting tested as much as I do”. But, this time, considering how much attention this is all getting? He might just be telling the truth. Or not. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coaches Panel: Length-length discrepancy</title><link>http://velonews.competitor.com/2009/12/coaches-panel/length-length-discrepancy-to-shim-or-not-to-shim_101909#comment-25845103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My leg length difference is approx 1.5", result of a motorcycle accident. Both answers are excellent, and nobody said about the fitter: "What was that idiot thinking?" I'd guess the fitter hasn't much experience with LLD. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saranac - Matt Brewing Company - Tell Us What You Think</title><link>http://www.saranac.com/page/comments#comment-21825335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tue Nov-03-2009: Just opened your winter mix. "Big Moose Ale" is a excellent - a lovely and medium bodied English ale type. "Maple Porter" is an excellent porter, but the maple is too strong. The concept is in the right place, it just needs to tone down the maple flavor from a strong flavor to the "hint" that the label copy promises. "Rye IPA" is a good, but mild, IPA. I happen to prefer a mild IPA. The "Black Lager" is a nice lager, but a bit light for a dark lager. All criticism aside, you have one excellent beer here, 2 very good, and one that could be excellent (the Maple Porter). Thanks for an enjoyable variety pack!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Linux kernel getting bloated ? Linus Torvalds says Yes!</title><link>http://www.aboutlinux.info/2009/09/is-linux-kernel-getting-bloated-linus.html#comment-18573813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Each new version of the kernel has provided markedly better hardware management. Or maybe that is the rest of the stuff you get with the kernel. I'm not sure I know enough to know. However, I DO know that the general usability of Linux has improved light-years over the last several years. And that is mostly to do with stuff "just working" out-of-the-box.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, if that is causing bloat, which I also can believe (I've been using GIGAbytes for linux installs now, not MB!), then perhaps the only option is the compile-your-own-kernel-on-your-hardware option. But that would mean recompiling every time you swapped a cd drive, or a sound card, wouldn't it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Haiku - A new Operating System inspired by BeOS</title><link>http://www.aboutlinux.info/2009/09/haiku-new-operating-system-inspired-by.html#comment-18573338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would disagree with the commenter about an OS not needing dependencies. Technically, they are correct - however, and this is a big However! - Linux and Window both have dependencies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Windows, probably 99% of developers rely on Windows libraries to work. These are dependencies. In Linux, developers do the same thing - they build a program that "calls" system libraries, or other program libraries - i.e. dependencies. It is the same thing, whether in Windows, or Linux.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, developers don't HAVE to do this - but apparently it is usually more work to do this, since so few do make fully stand-alone programs. That would be why a package manager would be a must-have for any OS to be ultimately successful. In Macs and  Windows, the "package managers" are sufficiently integrated into the OS that the user rarely even recognizes that they are there. To a degree, I suppose, Mac and Windows  have simplified their package management environment by setting rules that developers have to follow for their programs to work. Linux developers can rely on distro package writers and the end-users to do some of this work. Maybe Linux could learn something on this score. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hiero2</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:02:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>