<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for gkparkinson</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/gkparkinson/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/gkparkinson/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:18:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Search is broken – really broken.</title><link>http://luckyrobot.com/?p=184#comment-6071675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some good ideas and nice observations here, thanks. This post along with a number of others recently (by, eg, John Borthwick and Adam Greenfield) seem to be tending on a convergent course with some things I have been thinking lately; helpful and encouraging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In your last couple of paragraphs you go toward an idea I like: 'emergent search' by association or connotation; the kind of lateral jump we make during conversation from one thread to another, bound by metaphor as much as anything... I frequently get the feeling of this at work reading twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concerning your remarks about fragmentation and complexity ("Since web 1.0...), the feeling that it is making life more complicated is a product of the extent to which we don't quite yet understand how the parts of the emerging system fit together. The incredible speed of popular adoption of social/communication technology tells us that more problems are being solved than created, I think. The fragmentation is necessary to discover the underlying potential for unity -- as you say, necessary for the next phase.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gkparkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:18:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>