<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for gijsmoonen</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/gijsmoonen/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/gijsmoonen/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:16:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: You should see this</title><link>http://www.klatergoud.com/2009/04/you-should-see-this/#comment-8721879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adaptive behavior=organizations+individuals. Couldn't agree more with this. &lt;a href="http://Creatad.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Creatad.com"&gt;Creatad.com&lt;/a&gt; is a great example of one of the inititatives that are playing with this idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But why doesn't this guy mention 'guerrilla marketing' at all? Seems to me that we should consider this kind of marketing also as a tool in the future of advertisement..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ome Bil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:16:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is new marketing?</title><link>http://www.klatergoud.com/2008/12/what-is-new-marketing/#comment-4310007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i couldn't agree with you more. But what i'm trying to say is that companies probably think of that idea as to ' idealistic'. They won't step aside i'm afraid. To afraid to lose control perhaps...?&lt;br&gt;" New marketing has something to do with giving users &lt;br&gt;something to talk about and then stepping aside"  --&amp;gt; great example for me is &lt;a href="http://onemen.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="onemen.org"&gt;onemen.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;See there demand for ' donate your talent' . That might be the new marketing of good causes?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ome Bil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is new marketing?</title><link>http://www.klatergoud.com/2008/12/what-is-new-marketing/#comment-4309707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would that be the purpose? Than you would give away your own authority as a brand to your consumers. You would also lose your own priority purpose out of sight, unless your brand is called ' twiiter', ' flickr' or something else where you really need producing consumers, ' prosumers' .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ome Bil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:41:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>