<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for gialyons</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/gialyons/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/gialyons/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:43:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Increase Your Company's Productivity With Social Media</title><link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/09/increase_your_companys_productiv.html#comment-320399145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Ask Me About" is a great example of tagging yourself. A customer of mine also suggested tagging your profile with your willingness to mentor, too. Great for on-boarding new hires or newly acquired employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Turtle Ultimately Wins The Race</title><link>https://www.socialfresh.com/the-turtle-ultimately-wins-the-race/#comment-70289535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comments! I honestly think this is why it's so hard to justify "hanging out" on the Web all day long, because, as SimpleLeap Software says, you don't see the results instantly, nor can you point to some social Web moment and say, "that's a lead."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This makes it difficult to justify a fully loaded FTE - someone who knows your company, your products, your people, your customers, your prospects - to just "hang out" all day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Higher-end hotels have one to several concierges. How is that job justified, I wonder?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What's next with Lotus Connections ?</title><link>http://www.lbenitez.com/2010/01/what-next-with-lotus-connections.html#comment-30222099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations! Great to hear about all the exciting new and improved stuff coming in Lotus Connections. See you in the field, mi amigo. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:39:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The S Word</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/12/the-s-word/#comment-25806012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love your prose abilities, Alex! People will use the software that they know the people they need to know use. Call it what you will, but make it usable, please.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The S Word</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/12/the-s-word/#comment-25791420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine anyone pitching their ESSP wares without using more than just the word "social" these days. During the sales stage, vendors always trot out the entire tag cloud associated with "social" when trying to describe business value (just ask me - I'm a vendor). So, picking a label isn't really critical if you're using all of them in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue is when you get to the implementation stage. You need to understand your organization's culture well enough to successfully position these platforms in the context of everything else IT has thrown at them for the past decade. So, calling it "collaboration tools" will just confuse the hell out of your users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, if you spend time culturally branding your ESSP solution, and promote it, and communicate clearly about how it enables specific business initiatives beyond "better collaboration" - basically do everything you've never done with all those other "collaboration" tools of the past - then achieving real business value becomes probable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just sayin'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exercise &amp;amp; Cold Weather:  Survive The Chill</title><link>http://crumpleitup.com/b/?p=538#comment-24434347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like stuff from &lt;a href="http://lululemon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lululemon.com"&gt;http://lululemon.com&lt;/a&gt;. It's a Vancouver, BC-based company, and their fabrics and fit are premium.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise 2.0 is Not THAT Big a Deal</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2009/11/enterprise-2-0-is-not-that-big-a-deal/#comment-23631509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I believe that Enterprise 2.0 will be as big a deal for corporate performance and productivity. I believe this because I believe that the informal organization is as important as the formal one for getting work done (do you agree?)"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do. Undocumented human-centric business processes - the stuff we've all been doing in conference rooms, IM, email, the phone, in the hallways - have great potential to become more efficient, and more importantly, become more OBSERVABLE across the enterprise with ESSPs. This means they could benefit from innovative improvement, and ohmigod, even standardization across the enterprise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ok, I might be pushing it with that last statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leaving Forrester, Joining Jive</title><link>http://blog.strategicheading.com/2009/09/14/leaving-forrester-joining-jive/#comment-16598091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy crap! That's awesome news! Glad to have you aboard the Jive Juggernaut!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friending and Reputation</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/friending-and-reputation/#comment-14706804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fiercely interested in this topic, so thanks for posting! I asked my Twitter network about a month ago, "Does following equal recommending?".. here's what they said: &lt;a href="http://giatalks.com/blog/follow-me-here/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://giatalks.com/blog/follow-me-here/"&gt;http://giatalks.com/blog/fo...&lt;/a&gt;. Like many posters, I've been asked to recommend people simply because we got our paychecks from the same company. That's a no-go for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm focused more on what happens inside large organizations, since recommendations seem to have even more weight within a finite community ("Gee, I have coffee with her every day, but I don't really know if she's any good at her job.").&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line: I can only recommend people for their skills that I have personally witnessed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:28:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So Fresh Tshirts</title><link>http://socialfresh.com/so-fresh-tshirts/#comment-13819570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like #2 better. They both need to be ironed, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:09:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [secondary artif@cts] &amp;bull; Yes, Enterprise2.0. e2conf lessons learned.</title><link>http://secondaryartifacts.tumblr.com/post/130110006#comment-12014874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, attribute, buster. ;) That's an original statement by yours truly (rare, I know, but still).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gialyons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>