<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for georgemathew</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/georgemathew/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/georgemathew/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 08:36:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Muscle-flexing</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=570a0dcc-9606-4af4-4bde690919d3&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-48329492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's no transparency at all in the functioning of the BSE and the NSE. It's strange that Sebi is not demanding more disclosures from them. When the bourses are not transparent and don't believe in "good governance", how can they demand more disclosures from the companies listed on these exchanges?&lt;br&gt;Sebi's actions in this particular case (market development scheme) are also very very strange...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 08:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :SEBI’s Serial Slip-ups</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=557fb4ee-3fb8-a856-4ba9b6f2507d&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-42074613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This "Swamy10" didn't have the courage to put his name. I fully endorse the views of Sucheta on the ULIP issue.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :When you have butter why seek ghee?</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=38c784cf-776d-ed9e-4b90c92c6386&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-38409501</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Good ideas Mr Ramakrishna. I'm reading your article after a long time. I wonder why the government has exempted individual legal services from paying tax. Reason: There are some powerful politicians who are also big-time lawyers. They will be forced to pay tax. Does the finance minister have the courage and strength to tax these "powerful" politicians? I doubt it. Mr Ramakrishna should write more about contemporary issues...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :India Foils’ minority shareholders get a raw merger deal</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=3ddd0ec2-b357-a5d9-4b8e4dedcafc&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-37930529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good article. There's no dearth of promoters who have scant regard for shareholders and law. Are Sebi officials sleeping?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Collar the Watchdog</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=bfd93a04-e4e7-4f33-4b865a9331a8&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-37929108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Our regulatory bodies are functioning like ivory towers. And their top officials are in some utopia. I don't think they know the pulse of the market and retail investors. They have been enforcing regulations using the trial and error method. There's a lack of basic wisdom. Why is the government turning a blind eye to the drama going on in the capital market? Look at the IPO market, they (regulators) have managed to keep retail investors out. In the name of "investor protection", they will now kill the mutual fund setor also. Let's hope that the Parliament, lawmakers and the Finance Minister will bring some sanity in the market.       &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Put the SEBI House in Order First</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=c02950ee-99f5-a72c-4b176c917651&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-25133522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Sucheta. Why's 'investoractivitist' scared of putting his/her name?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:00:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Public NSE’s Private Shareholders</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=f295bc78-2f36-f7f5-4af2ad2d65f4&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-22702359</link><description>&lt;p&gt; NSE's argument is a joke. What are they trying to hide by trying to be "private"? It's another tactic by the NSE to remain a closed-door club without facing any questioning from any quarters. As it turns out, majority of the stake is held by government-owned banks and FIs. Then how can it be a private company? If the NSE is a private company as it claims, then the government should immediately take steps to make it a public company. &lt;br&gt; Can the NSE explain how it expanded the shareholder base and the criteria adopted to select the shareholders?? How did it select Gopalakrishnan, Tanti and Kothari as shareholders?&lt;br&gt; NSE should be more open and transparent and set an example to hundreds of other listed companies.&lt;br&gt;  Is Mr Pranab Mukherjee listening?&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Cooperative Banks don’t report defaulters</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=7e2ab249-d857-d7a5-4ac366650399&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-18544832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vidyut, Good story... This never occurred to me...  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sucheta Dalal :Good Times at the NSE</title><link>http://www.suchetadalal.com/?id=c4ad7d57-8f01-c2dc-4abb2bebb086&amp;base=sections&amp;f#comment-18544367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Other listed companies at least disclose various details, including "vulgar" CEO salaries in their Annual Reports which are in the public domain. But why stock exchanges are not making their CEO salaries public? As Indian exchanges are private, unlisted companies, they take it for granted... Stock exchanges are the least transparent organisations in the country. Ironically, they demand complete transparency from companies listed on them. Wall Street used to be like this earlier. My suggestion is that exchanges should send their Annual Reports to all listed companies and the media. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">georgemathew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>