<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for geneT</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/geneT/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/geneT/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:21:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Discipleship Struggle</title><link>http://emergentnazarenes.blogspot.com/2008/12/discipleship-struggle.html#comment-4815308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coming in a bit late, one thing that strikes me is lack of mention of empowering by the Holy Spirit.  &lt;br&gt;Pentecost marks the empowerment of the quavering disciples - teaching, the resurrection, Jesus post-resurrection gatherings were all inadequate - ONLY after their empowering at Pentecost did the disciples display power.&lt;br&gt;And they were directed by Jesus to await this empowering.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hence, I'm of the persuasion that even these days, any good plan/program/structure that is not powered by the Spirit will be destined for mediocrity, if not visible catastrophe.&lt;br&gt;Hence, it seems that the rhythm of "work" is &lt;br&gt;   a) "upper room prayer" by the Body until power is received&lt;br&gt;   b) work impelled by that power.&lt;br&gt;While I still have much to learn &amp;amp; articulate, it seems very clear that ANY work lacking the empowerment of the Holy Spirit will (and should) fail to fully glorify the Father.&lt;br&gt;gene --&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geneT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paul</title><link>http://emergentnazarenes.blogspot.com/2008/11/paul.html#comment-4251804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THANKS for this link.&lt;br&gt;Nicely disrupting my thinking :-&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geneT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paul</title><link>http://emergentnazarenes.blogspot.com/2008/11/paul.html#comment-3890154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, we'd lose the last half of Romans 8 :-((&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geneT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orthodoxy and Orthopraxy</title><link>http://emergentnazarenes.blogspot.com/2008/10/orthodoxy-and-orthopraxy.html#comment-3225476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As by a thermometer the temperature is known, &lt;br&gt;by our "praxy" is our "doxy" known.&lt;br&gt;   ...  the outflow from the heart.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But if our advertised "doxy" doesn't match our "praxy-demonstrated doxy",  we deceive ourselves, and onlookers.  As I look at the current U.S. organized church, I see much deception.  Will "emergent" or "house" or "organic" or ... church form rescue us from that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, its urgent to wrestle with what we believe - and then look at what we DO to see what we _really_ believe.  Individually, and as the Body of Christ&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geneT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>