


document.write(' \
<style type="text/css" media="screen">\
	 .dsq-widget ul.dsq-widget-list {\
	 padding: 0;\
	 margin: 0;\
	 text-align: left;\
	 }\
	 img.dsq-widget-avatar {\
	 width: 32px;\
	 height: 32px;\
	 border: 0px;\
	 margin: 0px;\
	 padding: 0px 3px 3px 0px;\
	 float: left;\
	 }\
	 a.dsq-widget-user {\
	 font-weight: bold;\
	 }\
	 a.dsq-widget-thread {\
	 font-weight: bold;\
	 }\
	 p.dsq-widget-meta {\
	 clear: both;\
	 font-size: 80%;\
	 padding: 0;\
	 margin: 0;\
	 }\
	 li.dsq-widget-item {\
	 margin: 15px 0;\
	 list-style-type: none;\
	 clear: both;\
	 }\
	 span.dsq-widget-clout {\
	 padding: 0 2px;\
	 background-color: #ff7300;\
	 color: #fff;\
	 }\
	 table.dsq-widget-horiz td {\
	 padding-right: 15px;\
	 }\
	 </style>\
	 <ul class="dsq-widget-list">\
	 <li class="dsq-widget-item">\
	 <a href="http://disqus.com/guest/53de77206048c81acda6942510aa03b2/"><img class="dsq-widget-avatar" src="http://media.disqus.com/images/noavatar92.png"></a>\
	 <a class="dsq-widget-user dsq-unregistered-user" href="http://disqus.com/guest/53de77206048c81acda6942510aa03b2/">Feigin, Patent Attorney</a>\
	 <span class="dsq-widget-comment">Aren\'t they a little delayed in this suit?</span>\
	 <p class="dsq-widget-meta"><a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/11/post_30.html">YooHoo v Beanie Boos re Crossed Big Pupiled Colored Iris Eye Dolls</a>&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/11/post_30.html#comment-23882507">7 hours ago</a></p>\
	 </li>\
	 <li class="dsq-widget-item">\
	 <a href="http://disqus.com/guest/4cb47ae8263aad9a1c04cead2af7fa75/"><img class="dsq-widget-avatar" src="http://media.disqus.com/images/noavatar92.png"></a>\
	 <a class="dsq-widget-user dsq-unregistered-user" href="http://disqus.com/guest/4cb47ae8263aad9a1c04cead2af7fa75/">lifeisgood4everyone</a>\
	 <span class="dsq-widget-comment">How can a company own the exclusive rights to a saying that has likely been used for decades??? I can understand ownership of the saying "plus" that stupid-looking character but something is really...</span>\
	 <p class="dsq-widget-meta"><a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/04/life_is_nutz_v.html">LIFE IS NUTZ v LIFE IS GOOD</a>&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/04/life_is_nutz_v.html#comment-23874521">9 hours ago</a></p>\
	 </li>\
	 <li class="dsq-widget-item">\
	 <a href="http://disqus.com/dtobias/"><img class="dsq-widget-avatar" src="http://media.disqus.com/uploads/users/3655/avatar92.jpg"></a>\
	 <a class="dsq-widget-user" href="http://disqus.com/dtobias/">dtobias</a>\
	 <span class="dsq-widget-comment">The actual plaintiff is "PLAYBOY.COM, INC.", apparently a separate corporation from the Playboy company which publishes the paper-based magazine, though this is muddied considerably by the...</span>\
	 <p class="dsq-widget-meta"><a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/11/who_is_the_lawy.html">Who Is The LAWYER OF LOVE?</a>&nbsp;&middot;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/11/who_is_the_lawy.html#comment-23462618">5 days ago</a></p>\
	 </li>\
	 </ul>\
');
