<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for fluidcreativity</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/fluidcreativity/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/fluidcreativity/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:30:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Setting up a linux web development environment on Vista</title><link>http://www.fluidcreativity.co.uk/fluid-thinking/setting-up-a-linux-web-development-environment-on-vista/#comment-19108491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for explaining about the kernel update. Now it makes sense! VBox additions certainly work fab for me, allowing proper full-screen linux. It's great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Lose a Fortune in Social Media</title><link>https://onemanandhisblog.com/2009/09/how_to_lose_a_fortune_in_social_media/#comment-16581121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The money spent on a website seems to depend on who the client is, it's as backwards as the football transfer market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who would spend $16 million on social networking software? They are being taken for a ride.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reminds us of a story here in the UK. Birmingham City Council spend £2.8 million on a website that doesn't even come close to working...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check it out:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/birmingham-city-council-fail/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/birmingham-city-council-fail/"&gt;http://blog.fluidcreativity...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HOW TO: Experience the Apollo 11 Moon Landing in Realtime</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/12/apollo-11-moon-landing/#comment-12571564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great. Social media at its finest. Whoever was put in charge of this project has done an excellent job...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:42:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tumblr Submissions: Create Your Own Community-Powered Blog</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/12/tumblr-submissions/#comment-12566900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a fantastic addition to an already wonderful service. If tumblr was able to integrate seamlessly to third party applications in a similar way to twitter, then I think it would gain significantly more users quite rapidly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Could it be the service that kills Wordpress?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tumblr Submissions: Create Your Own Community-Powered Blog</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/12/tumblr-submissions/#comment-12566820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a fantastic addition to an already wonderful service. If tumblr was able to integrate seamlessly to third party applications in a similar way to twitter, then I think it would gain significantly more users quite rapidly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Could it be the service that kills Wordpress?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8217;09 Revenue to Top $500 Million</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/06/facebook-2009-revenue/#comment-12253124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With 200 million active users and revenue of just $500 million, that amounts to $2.5 per user per year. That isn't enough money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/is-facebooks-making-enough-money/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/is-facebooks-making-enough-money/"&gt;http://blog.fluidcreativity...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Build a Strong Reputation With Blog Comments</title><link>http://copybrighter.com/how-to-build-a-strong-reputation-with-comments#comment-10346186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since we installed Discus over at our blog we've seen a decent increase in comments. I'm amazed that I've been online for so many years and have never registered a gravatar before...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:00:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twollars: An Innovative Approach to Fundraising on Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/twollars/#comment-9950365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It may or may not be a good idea but try explaining it to someone who has just started using twitter/the internet and they won't understand it or see the point in it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unless you can lock down what the service does in one or two sentences I think it becomes very difficult to promote it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the carbon footprint of twitter?</title><link>http://www.fluidcreativity.co.uk/fluid-thinking/what-is-the-carbon-footprint-of-twitter/#comment-9949569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's the number of people who visit &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; monthly...I figured it was as good an estimation as any as to the number of twitter users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You Ignore Ads; VideoEgg Thinks They Can Change That</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/06/videoegg-attentionrank/#comment-9088174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People do ignore ads, and a blog as large as mashable wouldn't want to sing from the hill tops about how social media users either:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a) Ignore online ads&lt;br&gt;b) Block them completely with ad block plus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check out our blog post on this very same topic, it's much more cutting!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/attention-optimization/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/attention-optimization/"&gt;http://blog.fluidcreativity...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Retweeting Movement Adds Some Powerful New Tools</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/05/tweetmeme-bar/#comment-9050937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter needs these aggregation services to sort the wheat from the chaff. The influx of new users means there are a ton of people who aren't adding value to the network, tweetmeme and others make it easier to stay on top of what's hot and what's not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;None the less, @thejonasbrothers make regular appearances on the front page. Is this valuable? Check out our blog post on it...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/popularity-vs-value-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/popularity-vs-value-on-twitter/"&gt;http://blog.fluidcreativity...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twittl: The Love Child of Digg and Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/05/twittl-twitter-digg/#comment-9011876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With Britney Spears and P Diddy being in the wefollow top 25 users twitter NEEDS a new way to sort out the noise from the value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like the cut of twittl's jib in trying to achieve this. Maybe the digg model isn't the best suited to this sort of task, something which aggregates tweets naturally in a more concise fashion than twiturly does.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wrote an article about this very thing over at the fluid blog, check it out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/popularity-vs-value-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fluidcreativity.co.uk/index.php/popularity-vs-value-on-twitter/"&gt;http://blog.fluidcreativity...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluid Creativity</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 09:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>