<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for floydbishop</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/floydbishop/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/floydbishop/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:27:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Stephen M. Levinson's Blog | A little animation test</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/stephen_studios/2010/09/17/a-little-animation-test/#comment-79049055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking good, Stephen!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | &amp;#8220;Wow. This guy actually gets it!&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/11/06/wow-this-guy-actually-gets-it/#comment-22050050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric, I hope you like these characters... it looks like they're going to be around for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time. Congratulations on the review!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Stephen M. Levinson's Blog | Gnomon School starts Monday!</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/stephen_studios/2009/09/19/gnomon-school-starts-monday/#comment-17026550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Stephen, when you get settled in, let me know and maybe we can meet up. I'm down in San Diego, but drive up to LA every so often. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:13:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Frederator Films | Lunch with Genndy.</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/frederatorfilms/2009/09/05/lunch-with-genndy/#comment-16201612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been waiting to hear more about this for a while now... I don't just mean Frederator Films, but what happened to Jack? Did he ever defeat Aku and get back to the past?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Pixar: The house of sequels?</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/06/09/pixar-the-house-of-sequels/#comment-10701067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me, it seems that "Toy Story 3" presents the most logical sequel. Andy grows up and what happens now? I think "Monsters Inc" was wrapped up so nicely at the end that a sequel could feel forced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for "Cars 2", that's just a flat out money machine. The characters were a bit stale and cliche in the first film, so the story would have to be absolutely stellar to warrant a sequel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;None of these films were designed as sequels from the beginning, in the same way that Star Wars or Lord of the Rings were. Without that greater story arc to be concerned about, the films play almost like episodes of a tv series rather than a film. Why should I worry about the characters when I can rest assured that they will return in a sequel a few years later? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:04:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Pixar: The house of sequels?</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/06/09/pixar-the-house-of-sequels/#comment-10700887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is my understanding that the Vancouver studio will handle all non theatrical content, including things like TV specials, Happy Meal commercials, etc. Pixar south will still be doing all theatrical content, including the features and shorts that play before the features.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Pixar: The house of sequels?</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/06/09/pixar-the-house-of-sequels/#comment-10700831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But while they're working on another sequel, we're missing out on the movies they COULD be making. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:57:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Pixar: The house of sequels?</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/06/09/pixar-the-house-of-sequels/#comment-10700792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Coonfoot: I think you may have read more into my post than you should have. The point of the pose this question: Should Pixar make sequels to movies they have already done?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A few people seem to think they should. I don't know where you got the "Dreamworks haters" bit. Certainly not from my post. If you search the blog, you'll see quite a few favorable posts about many studios, Dreamworks included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've also worked on a few features, so I do know what "true intentions" lie behind many sequels (hint: it's green).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My issue with sequels to stories that have already been told is that they take time, effort, and energy away from new ideas that have to sit in a pipeline while the studios work on the sequels. This are now films that might not get made because the studio is busy with something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck with your animation career. It's a roller coaster to be sure. Part of the process of becoming a good animator is being able to carry on a good discussion about animation, and I hope to see more posts from you on the blogs in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:56:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | &amp;#8220;Monsters Vs Aliens&amp;#8221; the series?</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/05/20/monsters-vs-aliens-the-series/#comment-9732953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sgarime1: I'll have to check out your podcast!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:07:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Pixar Vancouver&amp;#8230; more details</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/05/11/pixar-vancouver-more-details/#comment-9247076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That isn't what I was going to say (my post was cut off... fixed now), but it does fit with my point: Dreamworks has learned from their past outsourcing experiences and has moved to better outsourcing partners. Nickelodeon knows how to make a quality TV series, so they're doing the show. Yes, they outsource a lot of the production as well, but it is done within the confines of a system they have had in place for several years (maybe not the same production partners, but they have done it in the past).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pixar has not had this same level of outsourcing, and will most likely have some growing pains as a result.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:57:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | First Studio Screening</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/05/06/first-studio-screening/#comment-9083367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations on the successful long hard slog of production. I'm really looking forward to this series. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | Your first look.</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/05/07/your-first-look/#comment-9083343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! This is really nice. I want to watch the show now!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:33:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Performance capture? In a Roger Rabbit sequel? It&amp;#8217;s more likely than you think!</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/05/01/performance-capture-in-a-roger-rabbit-sequel-its-more-likely-than-you-think/#comment-8899118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought about "Horton Hears a Who" and "Madagascar" when I was writing this post, but even those films can't hold a candle to the amount of flexibility in construction you see in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would say "Horton Hears a Who" comes the closest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Adventure Time | Pen&amp;#8217;s office door.</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/adventure_time/2009/03/21/pens-office-door/#comment-7415889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone should do a Pen Ward paper doll, where you can swap out his beard with different beards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Adventure Time | Speaking of storyboards&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/adventure_time/2009/03/21/speaking-of-storyboards/#comment-7415866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting to me that storyboard templates now include a spot for the network logo or bug. I used to hate those, but now I wish Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, and others would stop the annoying animated commercials at the bottom of the screen during shows. Those are much more intrusive and quite a bit worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Stephen M. Levinson's Blog | Some unfortunate news&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/stephen_studios/2009/03/11/some-unfortunate-news/#comment-7117085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the headline, I thought someone died! It may seem like it sucks that you didn't get into Cal Arts, but it's OK. You've got a lot of experience, and a long list of industry contacts already. Take some classes, go to some industry events, and don't let it bug you. The real stuff you need to know in this industry, you can't learn at any school anyhow. Keep honing your skills and tightening your reel and you'll go far. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | Meet Chad Woods</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/02/02/meet-chad-woods/#comment-6095823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there any chance for an "Art of Fanboy" book? I wish more series had art of books. I would buy one for this show and "El Tigre" in a heartbeat.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | L.A. is Unreal</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/02/03/la-is-unreal/#comment-5824248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish more events like this were on Saturday nights. The drive from San Diego to LA on a Friday is insane. To get up there by 7 means taking a day off. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | The Floyd Bishop Interview</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/02/02/the-floyd-bishop-interview/#comment-5785424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm the worst animator in that photo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:55:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Kung Fu Panda kicks butt at the Annies</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/01/31/kung-fu-panda-kicks-butt-at-the-annies/#comment-5770392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just found this quote from Stephen Worth over at The Animation Guild's website:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"ASIFA-Hollywood's membership currently numbers 4,000, and all of the major studios provide memberships for their staff. There's no imbalance involved here. Besides, most people in the animation business have worked for several of the studios at one time or another. They vote their conscience for the film or individual that they consider to be the best choice, not party line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ASIFA-Hollywood is a neutral ground between studios. Membership is open to anyone who would like to get involved. It isn't fair to ASIFA to suggest that the results are "stacked" in anyone's favor, and it isn't fair to the honorees, many of whom are Individual Achievement winners, to suggest that they don't deserve to be recognized for their work."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Kung Fu Panda kicks butt at the Annies</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/01/31/kung-fu-panda-kicks-butt-at-the-annies/#comment-5763180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess I'm not up on how the Annie awards are voted on, or could be swayed one way or another based on what a studio wants.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:03:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Channel Frederator Blog | Kung Fu Panda kicks butt at the Annies</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/channel_frederator/2009/01/31/kung-fu-panda-kicks-butt-at-the-annies/#comment-5748264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Pixar loses and the fix is in? I thought it won because it was a great film. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:21:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | Frosty Freezy Freeze Test</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/01/16/frosty-freezy-freeze-test/#comment-5270182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Again, the stuff looks great!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | Frosty Freezy Freeze Test</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/01/16/frosty-freezy-freeze-test/#comment-5243077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That looks great! One suggestion from a techie fx standpoint would be to add some secondary fx of frost on the glass, or some faint cold "steam" coming off of the freezie freeze. I wouldn't know that was a cold liquid unless you told me. It could be mud or a thick soup. I think the fluid sim is dead on though. I know how tough it is to pull that stuff off. Kudos to the FX guys. The viscosity and surface tension is great. You even have some hardening up look to the fluid after it's all in the glass!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frederator Studios Blogs | Fanboy and Chum Chum | Frosty Freezy Freeze Test</title><link>http://frederatorblogs.com/fan_boy/2009/01/16/frosty-freezy-freeze-test/#comment-5228751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't see anything, Is the post messed up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">floydbishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>