<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for flatacre</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/flatacre/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/flatacre/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:36:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
                            Alberta govt. to defund Bible-based schools, refuses to explain how they violate ‘diversity’
                        </title><link>https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/alberta-govt-to-defund-bible-based-schools-refuses-to-explain-how-they-viol#comment-4147038060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All it is is subversion. The political left will do anything to support their ideology. For example, a biological man just won a women's global bicycle championship today. What percentage of the global population is trans? Let alone biologically male trans that have no intent on becoming women? Now, what percentage of feminists would allow a man to dominate a women's global bicycle championship? "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle," sez the U2 idiot. It gets weirder. The male trans community is winning world wide opinion against the most radical feminists. What a bloody pretzel the left has created. And always has. And always will.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toronto Star editorial board fires back at Sarah Sanders for saying US has been nice to Canada</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/395601-toronto-star-editorial-board-fires-back-at-sarah-sanders-for#comment-3975978750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The Toronto Star has 1 million viewers." I thought it was a newspaper, not a TV station. Idiot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toronto Star editorial board fires back at Sarah Sanders for saying US has been nice to Canada</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/395601-toronto-star-editorial-board-fires-back-at-sarah-sanders-for#comment-3975976828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;^ Socialist idiot quotes irrelevant US law in an attempt to prove a non-point. I'm Canadian. The above idiot is not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 01:02:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toronto Star editorial board fires back at Sarah Sanders for saying US has been nice to Canada</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/395601-toronto-star-editorial-board-fires-back-at-sarah-sanders-for#comment-3975972636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Toronto Star is a socialist newspaper only serving the Trudeau liberal-left. It in no way speaks for Canadians. These globalist liberal pricks have no idea of history. They say, "The staff also asked readers to consider just “how nicely” Americans have treated Canada. “A lot of the time, what with you marching around ranting about 'Manifest Destiny'", the editorial board wrote." Manifest Destiny was created and promoted by American Liberals, the same globalist liberals as in Canada. Canada is an oligopoly run by Quebec Laurentian elites with their unCanadian, Trudeau, currently representing them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Red-Pill Culture Jumped the Fence and Got to Kanye West</title><link>https://www.wired.com/story/kanye-west-red-pill/#comment-3877074978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Liberal-globalists are fearing that human reason and sentience is stronger than indoctrination through their subversion of media, education, and culture.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To witness these deranged and desperate camel piss drinkers is a unique form of entertainment (evidently, Kanye West is now a white supremacist).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CA rbc</title><link>https://downdetector.ca/status/rbc#comment-3689836846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;11am in Toronto, can't log into RBC online banking. Message: This site can't be reached.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: D'Souza Accepts The Left's Big Lie | The Daily Caller</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/16/dsouza-accepts-the-lefts-big-lie-about-america/#comment-3571731117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The writer is a liar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"In particular, she voted for the extreme left, the Socialist Party. In 1928, she cast her ballot for Eugene V. Debs, who ran for president from his prison cell....Surrounded by intellectuals and activists, such as “Max Eastman, John Reed, Upton Sinclair, Mabel Dodge and Emma Goldman,” Sanger expanded her already leftist leanings (“Biographical Sketch,” Margaret Sanger Papers Project).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During this time Sanger also became involved in such radical groups as the Liberal Club and the Women’s Committee of the NY Socialist Party. Additionally, Sanger supported the anarchist-run Ferrer Center and the Modern School, where her children briefly received a non-traditional education, and took part in labor demonstrations and strikes put on by the Industrial Workers of the World."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://sangerpapers.wordpress.com/2016/10/31/election-special-the-politics-of-margaret-sanger/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://sangerpapers.wordpress.com/2016/10/31/election-special-the-politics-of-margaret-sanger/"&gt;https://sangerpapers.wordpr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Re: Weinstein: Anthony Bourdain Taking a Blowtorch to Enablers on Twitter Right Now</title><link>http://www.pajiba.com/web_culture/re-weinstein-anthony-bourdain-taking-a-blowtorch-to-enablers-on-twitter-right-now.php#comment-3565092741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good for Anthony Bourdain. Sharpened knives cut better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:45:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: These are Sean Hannity&amp;#039;s advertisers</title><link>https://www.mediamatters.org/node/751931#comment-3324497105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, George Soros, the self-admitted Nazi collaborator, finances this cess pool of a website.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 13:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conservatives lead in national poll shows need to change voting system </title><link>http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/2017-03-29t214851/conservatives-lead-national-poll-shows-need-change-voting-system#comment-3233406318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"And then consider this: under our first-past-the-post electoral system, it is possible — even likely — for a party with less than 40 per cent of the popular vote to win a majority of seats in the House of Commons."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, you mean Justin Trudeau and the liberals?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823592468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In his third point: "Terror Management Theory", Bobby, the self-described Muslim-progressive says:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"A well-supported theory from social psychology, called Terror Management Theory, explains why Trump’s fear mongering is doubly effective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The theory is based on the fact that humans have a unique awareness of their own mortality. The inevitably of one’s death creates existential terror and anxiety that is always residing below the surface. In order to manage this terror, humans adopt cultural worldviews — like religions, political ideologies, and national identities — that act as a buffer by instilling life with meaning and value."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Islam is a religion. It is also a political ideology, with it's own jurisprudence called Sharia Law. And it has it's own supra-national identity called the Umma. Is this guy a hypocrite or is he denying that he's a Muslim? Given the latter, I'm sure he wouldn't want to, because the Shariah penalty for apostasy is death.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If anybody takes this guy as a liberal, a progressive, or a liberal-progressive, geez have you been duped.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:26:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823569338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At least here (published in Raw Story March 23, 2016), the self-described, 'progressive muslim', Bobby Azarian, doesn't lie. There is no context to the Quran without reading the Hadiths (the actions) and the Sira (the sayings), all together, the sunnah of Mohammad. Which BTW, are, well, read about this horrific monster for yourself in their own texts, freely available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interviewer: "What do you say to people who believe that the Quran has scriptures that promote violence and intolerance?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bobby Azarian: "Arabic is a very rich and complex language. You can’t pick a verse from the Quran and isolate it from its context. Muslim scholars and theologians repeatedly mention that to understand a verse in the Quran, one has to learn first when and why it was revealed to the prophet Muhammad. Without this knowledge, one might be trapped in false assumptions about the true meanings behind many of the verses."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823560580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's your self-described, 'progressive-Muslim' man of science in an interview published by Raw Story (March 23, 2016):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Can you give some examples of how the Quran has revealed truths about the natural world that were later confirmed by modern science?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears that the Quran described the expanding universe long before it was confirmed in 1929 by observational data from the Hubble telescope.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Quran 51.47] And the heaven, We built it with craftsmanship and We are still expanding.&lt;br&gt;A study recently published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals intelligent and complex cooperative behavior amongst ants that was described in the Quran nearly 1400 years ago. Researchers from Princeton found that the “living” bridges ants instinctively form with their bodies are much more sophisticated than previously thought.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following verse from Chapter 27 of the Quran (Al-Naml, The Ants) explains that ants have the capacity to communicate and cooperate toward achieving a goal:&lt;br&gt;When they came to the Valley of Ants, an ant said, ‘O ants! Enter your dwellings, lest Solomon and his hosts should trample on you while they are unaware.’ – (Al-Naml –The Ants — Chapter 27, verse 18)"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823546645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever heard of the Northern Democrat Copperheads — the thorn in Lincoln's side? The viral disease of democrats is pervasive. Lincoln was wholly a Republican — the Emancipation Party — historical fact attests to this. Something that congenital lying democrats can't white wash. America is a Republic. Republicans have withstood and fought against Democrat racism and bigotry through to the present day. Republicans ended slavery, created full citizenship for blacks against full Democrat opposition, and won women the vote after 40-years of Democrat resistance. And won all civil rights battles since that time. Republicans even created the Environmental Protection Agency. The Democratic Party needs to be exposed, own their history, and be expunged as the historical terminal rot that it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823542538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No it's not. The Democratic Party is just a lot more cynical and subtle in their racism now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823540590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Myrddnn, you old hussy, give up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823539865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think about that. Do you really want Bill's shrill wife in a pant suit (which we all know should be an orange pant suit) talking to you for the next 4-years?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823538475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comey dropped an indictment. Only a fool would think otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823536810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Might just be me, but are you retarded? "I imagine those two ideas triggers some kind of an emotional response, i.e. a trigger." As far as a wall is concerned, I'd have to agree, it's not the brightest idea. Still, have you studied the economic impact of what Mexico is dumping on your country?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823531442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the more you do that, you moribund ape, the more voters Trump will get.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823528027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Point out the scientific reasoning. He used text book definitions and weaponized them to support his bias. He is a self-described 'Muslim-progressive.' If that doesn't strike you as an oxymoron, you've never studied the political ideology of Islam. The progressivism you believe in and what the writer speaks of as a Muslim are incongruous. Ask him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 02:01:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823519367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The writer is a self-described 'Muslim-progressive'. Which is an oxymoron, at least in terms of how you would describe yourself as a progressive. Give your head a shake and ask the writer some questions. Starting with his feelings about gay people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823514645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Weapons flow going into Syria, pushed by Hillary Clinton into Jihadist possession within Syria, including ISIS, that's there in those emails" — Julian Assange, Wikileaks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, H. Clinton is a creator and supplier of genocide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters&amp;#8217; brains</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/a-neuroscientist-explains-what-may-be-wrong-with-trump-supporters-brains/#comment-2823506278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With his self-styled, 'Muslim-progressive', and superior, 'Neuroscientist', definition, he's conducting this lib-progressive orchestra. They're mindlessly and typically playing along.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:35:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Delusion of the Canadian Mind</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/08/stephen-harper-canada-election/401753/#comment-2204703275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Always entertaining when one small person on a comment board thinks they're speaking for the whole country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">flatacre</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>