<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for fdossantos</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/fdossantos/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/fdossantos/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:53:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Knocking Down Apple's Walled Garden: HTML5 vs. iOS Apps</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/knocking_down_apples_walled_garden_html5_vs_ios_apps.php#comment-283389304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple via Steve Jobs have always pointed to 2 iOS development paths: Native app &amp;amp; web or HTML 5 apps. How taking the later path is an attack on the app store is unclear to me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Apple Delaying the Release of iPhone 5?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/28/apple-iphone-5/#comment-173779707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tech pundits presume that there is no new hardware announcements. The future of iOS and MacOS could very well include new hardware, and surely will.  When that hardware -- and software -- is released is yet to be known.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sprint Kicks Off the War Against AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8217;s Acquisition of T-Mobile</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/28/sprint-att-t-mobile/#comment-173751872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;". . . it’s also likely to face scrutiny from Congress." Really? What Congress (with a capital C) are you referring to? US Congress?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Transcript: "We feel. . . Blah, blah, blah. Beneficial to the American people Blah, blah, blah. Creates jobs Blah, blah, blah. Prudent to a growing economy Blah, blah, blah. American jobs Blah, blah, blah. Democrats will impede progress of the telecommunication Blah, blah, blah. Competive to existing Blah, blah, blah."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it a sure thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Japan Tech Shortage: Who&amp;#8217;s Affected?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/03/14/japan-tech-shortage-whos-affected/#comment-166177157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny. . . I thought everything was made in China.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More DroidDream Details Emerge: It was Building a Mobile Botnet</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/droiddream_malware_was_going_to_install_more_apps_on_your_phone.php#comment-161812717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What does leaving the burden on the consumer really mean to the consumer? So prior to downloading an we need to do a background check on the independent developer that made the check? Do we check the APK file for suspicious code? What exactly? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Unveils Delicious Bookmark Importer</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/17/google-delicious-importer/#comment-150972499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got this when I tried the new import service: "Received an error from the Delicious API". Is Yahoo! crying foul?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Twitter Must Expand Beyond 140 Characters</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_twitter_must_expand_beyond_140_characters.php#comment-150869123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. One simple way to "expand" the number of characters used in a Tweet, is to ignore twitter addresses or aliases as part of the message. By simply starting a reply to @rww, you've used up 4 characters! I never understood why this is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;#8217;s New Subscription Model &amp;#038; What it Means for Publishers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/15/apple-subscription-model/#comment-149856301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny how no one had a problem with Apple hosting &amp;amp; distributing their apps for free all this time, but they cry foul when they're asked to subsidize that distribution platform for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:56:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Announces New Payment System for Digital Publishers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/16/google-one-pass/#comment-149843946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You gotta love the last paragraph found on the One Pass home page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Google One Pass operates across multiple sites, so you can easily manage content across all of your online properties. It also offers payments in mobile apps, in instances where the mobile OS terms permit transactions to take place outside of the app market."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple’s Big Subscription Bet: Brilliant, Brazen, Or Batsh*t Crazy?</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/15/apple-in-app-subscriptions/#comment-147851898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The presumption made by Apple and yourself is that Apple is bringing new customers to Netflix, Amazon etc. I completely disagree with this assumption. Apple has played no role in marketing the Netflix service or the Kindle service. So the assumption is false and Apple just looks greedy for making this policy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Instagram Releases API to Expand Beyond iPhone</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/08/instagram-api/#comment-143142136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The iPhone is a niche product??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:40:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Is Now the Most Popular Smartphone Platform [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/01/31/android-most-popular-platform/#comment-138512352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Android isn't a fraud. But their spin on being "open" is a bit stretched. I always felt it was a just marketing speak, and learned that it's just that after getting an Android -powered phone for Christmas. I quickly learned that to do whatever I wanted to and with the phone, I had to root it. (A.K.A Jailbreak for iOS.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to root it I have to be certain that's it a method that will be accepted by the specific device being rooted. I'm a geek -- or I thought I was -- but when I was faced with the task of rooting, I gave up. I was too afraid of bricking my phone to go forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Android is a good platform and the better the hardware, the better it's performance.  But's it "open" speak is just not an accurate portrayal of what you will encounter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Is Now the Most Popular Smartphone Platform [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/01/31/android-most-popular-platform/#comment-138506667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Comparing raw numbers from one platform to another, across all phone handsets, Android is way ahead. But you have to sit back and admit that one phone, from one source -- Apple's iOS on iPhone -- has sold 16 million units. That's an amazing achievement. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:14:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy Player to Challenge iPod Touch [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/12/27/samsung-galaxy-player/#comment-119999585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;iTunes is hated on so my by tech snobs. But it really handles this issue well I feel. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy Player to Challenge iPod Touch [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/12/27/samsung-galaxy-player/#comment-119999286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pricing hasn't been released. Where are getting this scoop from. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Samsung Galaxy Player to Challenge iPod Touch [REPORT]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/12/27/samsung-galaxy-player/#comment-119998954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Notice that retina display is in quotes. That's because the display on the current iPod touch is NOT the same retina display on the iPhone. Putting them side-by-side makes the point very clear. So to your question: in this example - iPod to Samsung media players - the answer is no. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Just Killed… Consumer Confidence In Them</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/17/spin-this-yahoo/#comment-113926607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What the FUCK does this have to do with Apple. Go away, troll&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Just Killed… Consumer Confidence In Them</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/17/spin-this-yahoo/#comment-113925862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Export out of Flickr to your desktop, then import to Tumblr. Both services are missing E's so it shouldn't be too hard to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Just Killed… Consumer Confidence In Them</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/17/spin-this-yahoo/#comment-113924898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's meet here next year.  I suspect that Yahoo mail will be the last man - or service standing. I believe it'll be tied to Facebook as legacy service until we all assimilate into the FB way of communicating: POKING.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Just Killed… Consumer Confidence In Them</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/17/spin-this-yahoo/#comment-113921886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your point is well taken, but the average user of Delicious can't be compared to Julian Assange, nor can the fate of Delicious be likened to a "here-today-gone-tomorrow" situation.  No matter the fate of the service, there will be time for you to export your links to various top secret State Department files.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Just Killed… Consumer Confidence In Them</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/17/spin-this-yahoo/#comment-113918929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny how the back and forth on when wil/will they between Microsoft and Yahoo didn't scare me.  I held on to my Yahoo (paid) account that I've had since Al Gore invented the information super highway.  (I got crap emails going back to 1997 on there.)  But this Delicious business has crumbled my confidence in Yahoo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As MG writes, Flickr has a much of place at Yahoo as does Delicious.  They are killing Yahoo Buzz. Why wouldn't Buzz fit in.  stanleygriggs states it best: Yahoo needs to find a seller for Yahoo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gmail Lite: If You Build It Google, We Will Come</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/27/gmail-lite/#comment-104358036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook as text messaging?  No thoughtful responses that may include paraphases? Just quick one offs for the sake of saving seconds?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've saved off a few seconds for what? A quick piss? Start up a movie that's in queue 2.3 seconds earlier?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Could Soon Own the Trademark for the Word &amp;#8220;Face&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/11/24/facebook-trademark-face/#comment-102272567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't surprise me a bit that our patent and trademark system would even entertain this submission.  Next Face(TM)Book(c) will patent and/or copyright me and all 500+ million subscribers to their service as we are all their intellectual property.  We will all be sent cease and desist notices for the use of our (their) personas in day-to-day life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Maximize Your iOS Battery</title><link>http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/how-to/how-to-maximize-your-ios-battery/#comment-100266847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With location services on, is the OS continuously updating it's location?  I thought location was only called upon when an app needs it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OMG%2FJK%3A+Yeah%2C+I%E2%80%99ll+Reciprocate+Your+Middle%26nbsp%3BFinger</title><link>http://tctechcrunch2011.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/omgjk-yeah-ill-reciprocate-your-middle-finger/#comment-95744606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What sucks is that I can't watch this episode without having the Flash plugin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fdossantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>