http://disqus.com/by/eurleif/enSun, 19 Jul 2015 05:48:38 -0000http://steve-patterson.com/all-is-one-the-logical-case-for-mysticism/#comment-2144869609<p>But you said: "Their constituent parts would – their atoms and particles – but not unified as an independent “thing”." Perhaps instead of "there are some things that are literally incapable[...]", I should have said "there are some particles [...]". If some particles are causally independent of others, how can everything be one?</p>eurleifSun, 19 Jul 2015 05:48:38 -0000http://steve-patterson.com/all-is-one-the-logical-case-for-mysticism/#comment-2142724108<p>Objects may be made up, but surely causality and locality aren't made up. How can everything be one when there are some things that are literally incapable of influencing each other, because they are outside of each others' light cones?</p>eurleifFri, 17 Jul 2015 16:10:06 -0000http://feedbackfail.com/post/37837402#comment-646428<p>YOU ARE EDUCATED STUPID!</p>eurleifThu, 12 Jun 2008 12:39:15 -0000