<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for erinsaurus</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/erinsaurus/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/erinsaurus/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:42:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Fired For Inquiring About a Lower Salary Than Male Coworker : People.com</title><link>http://www.people.com/article/17-Year-Old-Fired-Lower-Salary-Than-Male-Coworker#comment-2768537187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Enforcing pay secrecy in most cases is illegal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Fired For Inquiring About a Lower Salary Than Male Coworker : People.com</title><link>http://www.people.com/article/17-Year-Old-Fired-Lower-Salary-Than-Male-Coworker#comment-2768535898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Enforcing pay secrecy is in most cases illegal. And according to the company CEO, it's the manager who was in violation of policy. Age is not important at a god damn pizza place. They are both high schoolers and their pay was decided at the time of hire so is not a reflection of performance. You need to get better at reading :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Fired For Inquiring About a Lower Salary Than Male Coworker : People.com</title><link>http://www.people.com/article/17-Year-Old-Fired-Lower-Salary-Than-Male-Coworker#comment-2768532245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Enforcing pay secrecy is in most cases illegal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 17-Year-Old Fired For Inquiring About a Lower Salary Than Male Coworker : People.com</title><link>http://www.people.com/article/17-Year-Old-Fired-Lower-Salary-Than-Male-Coworker#comment-2768530280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Except for the part where the pay is decided upon hire? Before the worker has had a chance to demonstrate their performance? Did that thought not occur to you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
				Private: Guys, Here’s What It’s Actually Like To Be A Woman			</title><link>http://thoughtcatalog.com/tucker-max/2015/10/guys-heres-what-its-actually-like-to-be-a-woman/#comment-2329434049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it women who are nasty, or is it your extreme misogyny?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:04:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Ghostbusters: Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon Join Melissa McCarthy (Exclusive)  </title><link>http://edit.hollywoodreporter.com/node/767610#comment-1820344564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So it wasn't a gimmick when it was all-male? Your sexism is the only thing that's tired here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:33:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Legal Rights Women Have That Men Don’t | Thought Catalog</title><link>http://thoughtcatalog.wordpress.com/james-b-barnes/2014/08/5-legal-rights-women-have-that-men-dont/#comment-1546082159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In 1980, the National Organization for Women (NOW) announced opposition to the draft, but stated that if there is a draft, women should be included the same basis as men.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pepper Spray That Takes A Picture And Alerts The Police</title><link>http://odditymall.com/pepper-spray-that-takes-a-picture-and-alerts-the-police#comment-1530954841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I happened to see your rape threat comment before it got deleted by a moderator, but I wanted to ask you... did you catch the part where you complained about men being painted as violent rapists, then followed up your complaining by telling someone you hope they get raped? Is anything clicking there?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:18:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528769774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I'd be totally cool with that. It'd be really interesting to see a male character forced to change himself fundamentally to attract his love interest (Little Mermaid), a kind and gentlehearted man being swept onto the white horse of the princess who saved him (Snow White), and a young prince being brought back to life by the kiss of a strong and noble princess (Sleeping Beauty). Bring it on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528693642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, you're right, I shouldn't have said "everybody else." What I should have said is "anyone reasonable."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528677775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If we were talking about the lives of real men and not a fictional story about people hunting ghosts, you might have a point with your last line. But as you may have noticed, Ghostbusters isn't a  documentary. All the male whining I've seen about this is based in negative assumptions about women (not even any particular women, the mere IDEA of women) and their capabilities as actors and comedians. Like it or not, that's misogyny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528647789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, you did post it in a thread full of misogynists, so congrats for knowing your demographic. Everybody else knows your "jokes" are a tired, thin veil for your contempt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528640375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, it isn't, so good thing I'm on a break at work! And pointing out things that are obviously racist doesn't make me a racist, it makes me observant. Don't worry, being called out on your bigotry isn't actually fatal, it just feels that way to your fragile ego. Later!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528635442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can take jokes that are funny. You fail the test.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:44:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528525294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In what world does this movie have "mainly a male audience"? Everyone I know loves Ghostbusters. But thanks for telling me how I feel about it! It's so much easier to be alive when people like you are around to fill in the blanks for me. Also, thanks for summing up the silliness of the collective male pants-shitting over this announcement with your last sentence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:31:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528522621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually think it shows great judgment. Ghostbusters has been one of my favorite movies since I was a kid. And because I'm an adult, I can recognize that making a new version does not prevent me from watching and enjoying the original whenever I want. Psst... I'm a woman. Not everything in the universe needs to cater to men, though I know that's a really tough concept for men to grasp (evidence: this entire comment thread).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528520201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How's being racist working out for you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:27:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528519441</link><description>&lt;p&gt;News flash: it's not actually the job of the rest of the world to bend over backwards to objectify women for you. I'm sure you do enough of that on your own.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528518191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get used to the idea that you're completely wrong, because you are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528516280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the big bad feminazis, insisting that you poor, victimized white men recognize the agency and personhood of people different from you. How dare they!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:24:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528507234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;God damn, I could not be more bored by your misogyny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528505625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry, do you even hear yourself? Women don't enjoy funny movies? 1958 called and they want their TIRED-ASS stereotypes back. By the way, quick fact check: womens' tastes range far and wide, and your wife, lovey as I'm sure she is, does not represent the interests and desires of all of woman-kind. See, there's this thing where we're all individuals with agency and our own thoughts and everything! It's pretty wild!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do men like you sincerely believe that the world was designed for your pleasure? It's perfectly cool for something to cater to its audience SO LONG AS that audience is male?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hear a lot about "feminist whining" but surely men like you take the cake. You throw fits over anything and everything if it doesn't cater directly to you. I can barely hear myself think over the collective male pants-shitting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528501399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my god, you're right, feminists are just AWFUL what with their constantly insisting that women are human beings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:14:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Ghostbusters' reboot: Paul Feig, and an all-women cast?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/showbiz/movies/paul-feig-ghostbusters/index.html#comment-1528486702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct! All I've seen in response to this story is a bunch of men complaining about the mere idea of this film, which they don't have to see, and which does not impact the existence of, or your ability to enjoy, the original. It seems to me if anyone's searching for victimhood, it's the thousands of manchildren whining that this remake will "ruin their childhoods." I'm going to buy stock in Kleenex... it's sure to go through the roof what with the deluge of male tears.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dallas morning show co-host, crucified for objection to ESPN&amp;#8217;s gay kiss, storms off set</title><link>http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/05/15/dallas-morning-show-co-host-crucified-for-objection-to-espns-gay-kiss-storms-off-set-118976#comment-1393335605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly don't belittle anyone for choosing Christianity for themselves. I completely and utterly support your freedom to make decisions for yourself about how to live your life and I assume you're doing what's best for you. I have a major issue with those who would try to legislate their religion and force me to follow its terms.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinsaurus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 11:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>