<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for emmacc</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/emmacc/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/emmacc/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:23:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Susan Boyle saves UK economy</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/04/24/susan-boyle-saves-uk-economy/#comment-8668855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm going to get a WWTSBD T-shirt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Butt Joint Spam</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/04/17/butt-joint-spam/#comment-8481040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those butt joint evangelists stop at nothing to spread their news. We had some at the door the other day, wouldn't leave until we took some leaflets and agreed to consider taking the butt joint into our hearts. Now they are going high tech, with their crazy butt joint spam. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open-Mindedness</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/04/04/open-mindedness/#comment-8294488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually an ellipsis has three dots, so I think you'll find you mean&lt;br&gt;... eh?&lt;br&gt;Now I'm just being argumentative for the sake of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open-Mindedness</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/04/04/open-mindedness/#comment-8255275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One way? As in it only makes sense and not nonsense? It is not the destruction of a ‘paper tiger’ but the destruction of many ridiculous real life arguments that sceptics hear from credulous fools who claim to be open minded because they believe any nonsense which they are fed, without thinking critically about the truth of those claims. &lt;br&gt;As for your attack on Dawkins, could you explain to me how this refers to anything that Dawkins says? He only asks for real evidence for a god, he has never (close mindedly) claimed there is definitively no god, only that there is no evidence for a god. His stance, if I may be so bold as to claim to understand it, is that the burden of proof of a supernatural being is with the person or people making the claim of a supernatural being. The only way Dawkins could be claimed to be closed minded is if you showed him evidence that god exists – actual scientific evidence, not testimony or anecdote, and he refused to accept it. Otherwise he is a scientist and a sceptic – a man able to weigh up evidence and come to conclusions. I would call that an intelligent man, myself, but perhaps we have different standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grater Rape</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/03/18/grater-rape/#comment-7326372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, someone really cool and funny must have taken this photo. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:15:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What If God Disappeared?</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/03/10/what-if-god-disappeared/#comment-7112182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, no! No Jesus, no peas? Why didn't anyone tell me? I love peas. Right, that's it, I'm off to church on Sunday. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek Bluescreen</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/02/13/star-trek-bluescreen/#comment-6236561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha ha ha! Brilliant. I used to love B3ta, haven't been for ages. Going there now though!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:23:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doctor Who vs Quantum Leap</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/02/12/doctor-who-vs-quantum-leap/#comment-6236559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you have just ruined Dr Who for me forever!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bible morality quiz</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/02/03/bible-morality-quiz/#comment-6180206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this and will be sending it to all my lovely, kind, gentle Christian friends who simply fail to see the true horror of the Bible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update your Bank of Scotland details</title><link>http://www.pinksy.co.uk/index.php/2009/02/11/update-your-bank-of-scotland-details/#comment-6180061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I always think, when I see these, that they would make more money if they just invested in a few English lessons. How difficult can it be? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">emmacc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:56:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>