We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Guest • 10 years ago

The liberal MSM ignored Fast & Furious, ignored the administrations silent war on conservatives, ignored Benghazi, and now wants the whole country to be up in arms because the same administration went after their own in the press. Go to hell liberals, you carried the water for this miserable failure for six years now; reap what you've sown

moderate Guy • 10 years ago

This is the most corrupt and crooked administration in history. Every single member and appointee of this administration, from cabinet members to judges, is a crook, a liar and a cheat.

Guest • 10 years ago

Perhaps one reason the public isn't "riled up" is that we just don't give a damn. We've been lied to by many administrations, gone to war with indifference, suffered a cretin in the Oval Office who preformed sex acts with a tart, etc. Many citizens have just concluded tht the path forward doen't have much to do with our present, dysfunctional government.

americanlatina11 • 10 years ago

contempt of congress

nolawyers1 • 10 years ago

Contempt for Administration. And the MSM who refuse to do their job. We are just waiting for the guards to surround our prison.

ptm • 10 years ago

He's lost respect from the ordinary citizen a LONG time ago, why the Liberal MSM doesn't recognize that fact is a question for the ages.

Guest • 10 years ago

I for one would like an apology from Holder for his calling me a coward. Had he said it to my face I might have hit him.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

Over 65 million ordinary citizens voted to reelect him.

altster76 • 10 years ago

But a vast majority of these fall in the low information and no information voter categories. Most of them likely still have little to no information because they don't pay attention to anything unless they need a new battery for their Obamaphone.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

I wish I could believe that, but considering all of their other unlawful behavior, those numbers are now suspect to me. That will probably be the next shoe to drop.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

But I'm sure you believe the 2000 election was legitimate.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

ps... I think the 2000 election was a blessing. Can you imagine Al 'Moonbeam' Gore as president? We'd have twenty million wind farms across the country and half the citizens would have frozen to death last winter.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

"Can you imagine Al 'Moonbeam' Gore as president?"

Yes I can. No Iraq War, maybe even no 9/11...sounds like a good start!

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

If you think Moonbeam could have avoided 9/11 you need to put some extra tin foil in your hat, sparky. I agree with you that he wouldn't have had the cojones to go after Al Queda and Hussein, which means we would have had a half dozen 9/11's between now and then. You're correct about that. Moonbeam wouldn't have had the courage to go after them.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11.

And maybe Gore wouldn't have ignored the warnings about bin Laden the way Bush did.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

Sorry, that should have been the warnings Clinton/Gore ignored...

MrBeale • 10 years ago

Except they didn't ignore them. Bush ignored them.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

Clinton/Gore ignored them for eight years after the WTC bombing, but it was Bush's responsibility in nine months to find and apprehend a team of 20 terrorists who did all of their training on US soil on Clinton/Gore's watch? You get the prize, a date with Pollyana.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

Clinton didn't ignore him at all. http://www.youtube.com/watc...

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

Clinton didn't ignore him? Who's the him, sparky? We're talking about 20 terrorists and you insert a 'him' into the argument?

I know Liberals have trouble with facts, but I said Clinton/Gore ignored 20 terrorists who trained in the USA under their administration, and made their plans under the Clinton/Gore administration for (depending on the terrorist) 4-6 years.

I said that because you claimed that an incoming President should have been able in nine months to ferret out what Clinton/Gore ignored during their eight year term.

If you don't have an answer for that, then eat a bag of Cheetohs, don't post me back. I'm tired of hitting you upside your thick skull.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

You mean the warnings Clinton ignored for eight years while the people who flew those airplanes into the towers were here training, right under his nose?

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

Holder's justice department has had five years now to find something illegitimate about it and haven't come up with anything, so it must have been. Keep your fingers crossed when a new administration comes in.

Like I said... considering the number of things that have come to light in the past three months, it wouldn't surprise me to see that shoe drop.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

Yes, I'm sure Holder has been preoccupied with an election from 12 years ago.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

That's right, the Supreme Court of the United States got fooled by a bunch of hanging chads. How could I forget...

MrBeale • 10 years ago

They weren't fooled. They issued a naked, partisan ruling. O'Connor has basically admitted as such.

HANGINOFF • 10 years ago

That must be a new legal term, 'basically admitted.' Kind of like 'it depends on what your definition of 'is' is... and 'I voted for it before I voted against it.' She 'basically admitted' to nothing of the kind but that kinda sorta depends on what your definition of 'basically admitted' is... I think...

ptm • 10 years ago

So what, all you're saying is that there are a lot of IDIOTS in this world - all you have to do is watch Leno's, Kimmel's and other men on the street interviews.

rockinrobinhood • 10 years ago

Not to worry, Obama has assigned his crack head of the DOJ as investigator of this crime against the 1st Amendment. Holder will get to the bottom of this in about 6 months or so.

nolawyers1 • 10 years ago

Oh, like Fast and Ferocious.

interventor • 10 years ago

Bo, the WH dog, may be Obama's main source of information as he fetches the Washington Post for his master. Why are we paying for all this expensive info gathering, if all Obama knows is from the media!

beniyyar • 10 years ago

The liberal Obama media is only encouraging the Obama junta to commit even greater legal abuses and inflicting more damage on the nation. The liberal media will continue to empower this crooked Obama regime until Obama is finally kicked out of office when this term runs out.

wildrover4 • 10 years ago

I'll posit a different theory: The public is not outraged because they don't view the publication of sensitive classified information, solely for the purpose of being first, as a strictly-protected right. The AP and Fox stories were not whistle-blowing affairs. They were not reporting on unethical, illegal or immoral conduct. They were putting our intelligence agencies at risk for the purpose of breaking a story. Frankly, I think the public believes that the respective reporters are lucky they were not arrested.

MrBeale • 10 years ago

And that theory is pretty much accurate. However, it doesn't allow Mr. Hewitt to feel victimized, so he can't go with it.

A J MacDonald Jr • 10 years ago

Pretend press corp is right :(

cookiebob • 10 years ago

"The public" doesn't know anything because the media covers it so lightly and refused to tell the entire story or explain why it is important. They almost cared. But the administration must have silenced the ones who were likely to tell the real story because, I just read two articles excusing Holder today and I am sick to my stomach.

If this gets swept under the rug freedom of speech is dead. I can't watch this country just disappear! But that is what is happening. Where will we ever find freedom again? Is there anywhere to go? We need another New World.

I pray there will be another America someday, but right now this is the Soviet Union.

I SEE • 10 years ago

Maybe when Examiner staff start doing THEIR job again, the public will buy the paper they put out. Instead, the Examiner is in trouble and has to discontinue its daily publication. If most of the MSM Press are sell-outs and Examiner staff are not, why isn't the Examiner doing better?

Guest • 10 years ago

Why did the liberal news publication Newsweek have to stop its print edition?

MrBeale • 10 years ago

The reason the public doesn't care is because there's no scandal. The justice department requested a warrant, and got one. That's the way it should be.

Now, if you want to criticize Obama for continuing Bush-era policies of WARRANTLESS wiretapping, I'll be happy to join in with you.

ptm • 10 years ago

When they LIE on the request forms - even then TWO judges refused the warrants, the 3rd one approved - and this is the JUSTICE DEPT? lying - nice. Of course now he (Holder) says - 2nd hand - he's sorry.