“So it’s under oath — big deal,”

"... after all, I took an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution, and instead I've decided to uphold and protect the Republican Party and its corporate sponsors."

Never heard him say that when he was touting testimony of witnesses in a death penalty case.

I wonder if Scalia thinks proof of citizenship would be an undue burden to purchase a gun?

Nino can run the question by Dark Cheney next time they go duck hunting.

On the bright side, maybe Cheney will get lucky.

superb observation, Doremus.

Good one!!!

That's a rhetorical question, right?

Maybe showing a gun should be considered proof of citizenship.

Perfection personified.

Have to pass a background check in order to buy a gun from a FFL licensed dealer. Have to show ID and prove you are who you say you are.

Not at a gun show. They will sale a gun to anybody!

The topic is not about buying a gun, it's about keeping illegal votes out of the voting booth. I know you leftists need those undocumented illegal people to vote for your leftist pals so you can win elections. You couldn't do it legally so you take the illegal path to destroy the country.

f44k you fascist loser

Your ignorance is showing. Thanks for putting it on display for all of us to see. You're the reason this country is in the mess that it is.

Not without filling out the proper forms and not a handgun. No license handgun dealer will just sell you a handgun without having the proper documentation. What gun show do you shop at, I'd like to inform the authorities that you are buying unregistered hand guns?

in oregon and most other states you can

Not true I purchased one of my guns at a gun show and I had to have a permit which includes a criminal back ground check. Now maybe ( mermaiden ) the idiot that likes to call people "LIARS" will call me a liar.

bulls%%t again

A drivers license is sufficient to buy a gun.

No without a permit from your local sheriff's office. Try to buy a firearm with a driver's license and you will get laughed out of the store.

Dude, I can walk into any Walmart with a drivers license and cash money and buy a gun. I don't need anything from the local sheriff's office to do it. You seem to be quite confused about the law.

You can walk in to Wal Mart and buy a long gun with a license and a "FBI" back ground check. But to buy a hand gun you will have to have a permit from your local sheriff's office.

No you don't, not even in California. You're confusing right to purchase with CCW requirements.

Edit: I stand corrected, 14 states require a permit to purchase a handgun but ironically none require a permit to purchase an assault rifle. It would be beneficial if state laws were consistent. For example a permit to purchase is required in Illinois but you don't even have to show proof of residency to buy a gun in Indiana.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

He's not confused at all. He's a LIAR. Thanks for the post.

You bought into Dormemus's lie. Good for you half thinkers and blind followers. My guess is a co2 pistol and a Paint Ball Gun is considered a handgun to you uninformed thinkers.

Not so, you have to fill out a federal form required by law and you can't buy a handgun. A shotgun, maybe and Biden says that's OK. Mixing words is as much as a lie. You can't buy a handgun at Walmart, they don't sell handguns.

Fine, if you insist on being pedantic (most gun aficionados are) In 36 states I can walk into any Walmart store that sells guns and fill out a NICS form 4473, show a driver's license and purchase a handgun, shotgun or rifle.

Depends on the state. I'm all but certain that in Virginia, a driver's license would be sufficient ID. Virginia does not require any permit to purchase a gun, and state law pretty much preempts localities from adopting tighter restrictions than are called for in state law.

And that assumes that you buy from a licensed dealer. That's not required, either, you know.

Thank you so much for this. I am sick and tired of these sly liars who post a short lie, trying to pass it off as a fact. Getting to the point where i can't stand these people.

since when and in what state?? i call bull$$it

Dore, that would presuppose there is any consistency in what Scalia proposes. Scalia works from the premise "How can I please my corporate masters and tea party backers?" And then proceeds to put it into legalese. Scalia is no more of a jurist than a transient on the street. What he is is a blowhard Republican lobbyist. Period.

Yeah, but those guys probably deserved it! I mean, if they hadn't done something, they wouldn't have been caught and tried, right?

True, but that's all in the interests of resolving the Great Conundrum: the state wants to put down a stray black puppy on the strength of a jury buying into the single sniff testimony of a licensed white poodle, while at all his lodge meetings he keeps hearing the grand vizier and licensed white poodles yapping about how there's so many stray puppies out there in the first place, their servants might start having trouble picking up all the stray puppy poop. Surely Scalia is entitled to think that all that yapping is fairly representative of licensed Poodlamerica.

I'd guess Scalia probably doesn't think it's necessary for people to vote in presidential elections--not when we have a Supreme Court to just install the one they want. Scalia was there the only time it's ever been done, and that turned out just swell, didn't it?

*Shudder*

One of the reasons I believe HE IS CORRUPT TO THE CORE. Thanks for mentioning that.

Touché!

Beat me to it! Like his oath to be impartial?

That's what Clinton thought....he was impeached for lying under oath.

Give it try....perjury is what you probably deserve.

Go to OpenSecets and educate yourself to what party is beholden to corporations and what candidate they helped to elect the past 2 election cycles. Hint: Obama.

Oh please. You are pathetic.

http://www.opensecrets.org/...

http://www.opensecrets.org/...

http://www.opensecrets.org/...

Corporate whores=Obama and Democrats.

http://www.opensecrets.org/...

This information is from FEC records. Guess the truth hurts.

Get back to me, you pathetic low-information drone.

I don't bother with right-wing claptrap. Get thee back to Breitbart b.s. you iggit.

Awesome.

It's so nice of you to let us know you only listen lying left-wing liberals BS. Now go back and drink somemore "OBAMA-AID" you iggit.

Not listening to far-right bilge and lies doesn't restrict one from keeping up with Republican politicians and policies. Just don't care about the opinions of reactionaries like you and your demented brethren.

Another left-wing low-information dolt who refuses to see the truth. OpenSecrets isn't right-wing but morons usually have to use a strawman when they can't debate with facts. Right DelrayDame?

Name calling is childish. If you can't make your arguments without name calling, we the people can't really read what you post. By hurting people with your childish name calling you just hurt yourself and your ideas.

You're right Bob, but sometimes you have to stoop down to that level when dealing with individuals who name call first. Facts are stubborn things and it seems some hate facts.