We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

Kendal Conradie • 10 years ago

Very interesting. I just don't think that this blogger should be commenting on the political climate of the 1970s as shown by this map when this visualisation only begins at December 1979.

Sharee Anne Gorman • 10 years ago

It would be great if the dots were color-coded by cause...different colors for war, human rights, elections, environment, food, global warming, labor...etc.

Domingo fernandez • 10 years ago

Let's do it, it's a great idea.

Jason Louv • 10 years ago

I am the author of this article, which was originally published at Ultraculture.org. I have not given this site permission to use the full text of this article, and they have done so in an amateur and greedy fashion, which shows just what kind of "action" they support. This violates Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) and I demand this site remove this article *IMMEDIATELY*

Friend • 10 years ago

I agree you have a right to claim this as your own and the site should take it down. However don't you think the more people who see this the better? Surely more people seeing this is better to show the impact protesting has.

Personally I believe with the age of the internet, it's become so much easier to organize and rally support for protests, which is why so many have took place in the last 15 or so years.

Films For Action • 10 years ago

Hi Jason, I have changed the title, body text and author so that the article is no longer attributed to you or your site.

http://www.filmsforaction.o...

(I can't change the url, but the text and meta-data now reflect the new title)

I did however leave a shout-out to your site and a couple cool pages on your site at the bottom of the article.

I am sincerely sorry that you were unhappy to see your article republished. 99% of the time, authors are happy to see their content republished with attribution on our site and have no complaints, and it was our understanding that link-backs to your site actually help your site's SEO. We don't do no-follow.

As an olive branch, you are welcome to republish any of the original articles I have written myself on your site. (Listed in the email I sent you)

As you briefly mentioned in your letter, we did think that 2 link-backs and full attribution with embedded links retained would be okay, but I can also understand your position wanting to keep your original content exclusive to your site.

Again, I hope you can accept this apology from us. Perhaps we can collaborate in the future on better terms.

Best, Tim Hjersted

Benjamin Lukoff • 10 years ago

You still should have asked before reproducing copyrighted content, don't you think?

Archiv • 10 years ago

Your a piece of shit Benjamin. People like you will get what you deserve.

Benjamin Lukoff • 10 years ago

An anonymous ad hominem attack. Classy, dude. And oh so effective.

vanessa • 10 years ago

greedy? are they asking for some kind of compensation? not that i can see. relax man, this is for information only, no one is gonna make money off this. this isn't a bank or insurance company where they will monetize your signature

Symphony • 10 years ago

Isn't it about spreading information? I mean, yes it's wrong to have your article stolen and it's tragic but it's more important to show people than to hide this information away, isn't it? You could inspire a world change but you're just bitching about credit. =/

Trevor Smith • 10 years ago

....Your mad about people spreading around your work?? Why? Its not like they claimed to have made it, or are making money off of it. Relax.

Joan Wheaton • 10 years ago

...original article link at http://www.ultraculture.org...

loudon • 10 years ago

I would like to know what constitutes a "protest" in the author's eyes. I remember more localized protests in municipalities when I was growing up including anti-abortion protests in the late 80's while living in Florida. I do find it interesting the growth of protests in the information age. I am trying to find the actual ultraculture article, but am having no luck.

Padraic - Ireland • 10 years ago

no sure how accurate this is... I live near one of the dots.no protest in the last 9 months.

Vesta Rivers • 10 years ago

new zealand was hugely active in protests via the spring box/ all blacks rugby anti aparthied in south africa.. and i was involved in many protests in australia and new zealand.. disapointingly not shown http://www.nzhistory.net.nz...

Altair Zielite • 10 years ago

What dots? which of these third party advertising scripts must I turn on to see this map?

Albertar • 10 years ago

This content was stolen without permission from Ultraculture.org. Please remove it immediately.

Max • 10 years ago

ehm, cant really see the harm, it does clearly state that its republished. And please; call things what they are. Has this disappeared from ultraculture to appear here? If not its not stolen, its copied, there a quite a large difference.

Albertar • 10 years ago

No, rather than quoting a few paragraphs with a link back, you've directly lifted the full text of the blog, the headline and the author's name, making it appear the author has given you permission to use it. Saying it's republished does *not* constitute permission to republish. This is a direct violation of Fair Use law, not to mention harms the ad revenue and SEO of the original site you have stolen from. Remove it immediately and learn to blog.

max • 10 years ago

I did no such thing, I only wrote a reply to your comment.

shanisa • 10 years ago

If you do not already know let me help you out an ACT requires consent so if the republisher does not consent to the ACT you aint got shit on him no jurisdiction over him whatsoever
lawful & legal is vastly different I suggest you go and learn about it a little
an ACT is basically a contract nothing more nothing less its not Law on any level
he did not cause loss or damage & in any case he actually promoted his work so it is completely lawful regardless to your view of its illegal :)

shanisa • 10 years ago

you mean the legalities of law or actual law :/
If he didnt cause lossa or damage then its not unlawful it just a legality :)

Roka • 10 years ago

Id like to do the same. Where can i get the code for the map? Id like to copy this to my site. I realy dont care any nonsence acts like this:Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) .....:-)))) Noone tell me on this world what can I do.... Im FREE from every man made laws and man made acts. ... So gimmmeeee the blody code for a map and i copy everyone website.... :-)))) hahahahahaha

shanisa • 10 years ago

Here here I feel like doing the same I cant be assed with them upity types such a waste of a great article to be so greedy n self rightious to stomp ur foot around n protest like a spoilt brat

and exactly ACTS require consent if yu dont consent to the ACTS they have no jurisdiction over you

I for one do not consent I am FREE from the legal drabble if I dont cause you loss or harm yu aint got shit on me too

Brian Kelly • 10 years ago

Hey Max, I'd like to share this on my blog as well. Where did you get the html or source code to publish the map?
Excellent find!

Joan Wheaton • 10 years ago
Micah Shane Mackley • 10 years ago

If nothing Else Jason, it got me to check out your site. Have an awesome day man... And Thanks

elspeth • 10 years ago

apparently australia and new zealand don't really matter

Maggie • 10 years ago

I don't see anything except a map!

Anthony • 10 years ago

there is an area above the middle east that doesn't light up much at all. what area is that? it's huge

Guest • 10 years ago

there a big area above the middle wast that doesn't light up very much. where is that?

Guest • 10 years ago

Inspiring Indeed!