We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
Those poor dogs.
You can see it's photoshopped, same position of hair and clothes on both photos. So he just had to take a simple portrait of the dog and add the clothes on photoshop !
Actually I couldn't see that but thanks for the explanation.
If you could see that, then what was the comment "Those poor dogs" about? when the dogs are clearly in no harm and have not been harmed during this.. All they've done is take two separate photos of the dog and owner and Photoshopped them together, as Thom has already pointed out.
I believe GTrain said that they couldn't see that it was Photoshopped. Why do people have to be so snarky with each other?
@Jade - Reading is fundamental. I said "I COULDN'T see that". And I thanked Thom for clarifying it for me. Now run along.
fuck up
I was about to say the same thing until I saw the below coments-- how rude of you... get a clue from the posts... DUH
You might be bored, Panda, but I thought you were cool. " Dislike " button pressed for unnecessary meanness towards the participants here. The dogs deserve respect as do the humans.
thought you would like this Tracy Brennan
miaow
I sense fotoshop disturbance!
For real Panda? That comment is seriously off. Is it necessary to consistently criticize women's appearance? Then we are bombarded by posts that tell us to love our selves. Some responsible posting would be appreciated.
Rachel Reese
The one is a woman, the other is a dog. Don't say shit like that. It's an old term of abuse for women, and I can't believe a site as smart as yours would say something so shameful.
So true.....
Marian Wolfe
excellent
Haha - I WISH I looked like my greyhounds, in build at least =)
Jane Hagan which woofer is your doppelgänger?!
photoshop
amazing
Haha that's so funny!
yeah! working now!
Wth? XD
Could you try once more?
What in the world??!!
404
404 :(
404
More like owners dressed as their dogs