We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

cityca • 10 years ago

Galloway is consistent. He always supports the most despicable, hateful, murderous and tyrannical regimes - Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Hamas and the Ayatollahs.

Does he believe that by supporting these thugs, Muslims in the UK will automatically support him?

Isn't that kind of patronising, expecting British Muslims not to reject the abominable regimes he supports, just because they are Muslims? Does he think Muslims don't have brains?

sarah_13 • 10 years ago

He is a consistent opportunist. A very important principle is at stake here. Those who wish to remove Mr Nawaz start with him but want all our ability to express ourselves freely squashed with the mob as the arbiter of what can and cannot be said. This is about all of our freedom to speak, express and hear all the arguments on all subjects.

Brian Beddowes • 10 years ago

Honestly, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Guest • 10 years ago

The one thing you can say about Galloway is that he is honest to convictions and not one of these slimey LIBLABCON's that are only in it for themselves and the rest of their cronies. If I wasn't voting UKIP,Galloway would get my vote.

davebesag • 10 years ago

If you don't think Galloway is in it for himself you haven't followed his career at all. One of the most rancid of all politicians.

Anthony Oliver • 10 years ago

If your convictions are in question, what's so good about sticking to them?

Rouleur1971 • 10 years ago

Galloway was against the sanctions that killed 1 million children in Iraq, he didn't support Saddam, unlike the US and UK who armed him. Hamas are democratically elected so hardly tyrannical and Tony Blair supported Gaddafi, not Galloway,

The worst thugs in the region are Saudi Arabia and you seem strangely silent on them - wonder why.