We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
This poem says it all, "The Stranger" - Rudyard Kipling.
"The Street" by HP Lovecraft
About 20 years ago a team-trainer was sent from our corporate headquarters to the branch office where I was working.
When one of the first things out of her fat mouth was, "Studies show that people prefer to be with people like themselves," it took all my self control not to respond, "No s**t?"
That birds of a feather flock together is something any smart 10 year old can tell you.
Team training--total BS, so no surprise there
It's another example of hubris followed by nemesis. Sixty years ago, we didn't have a race problem, but we decided to take radical measures to fix the non-problem and wrecked everything.
Our "leaders" (and people in general) would do well to heed the first tenet of medicine: "First, do no harm."
It was men like your Uncle Bull who prevented racial problems.
Watch out Peter! The a Duck Dynasty guy got fired for saying that we had no race problem 60 years ago
Or as one liberal idiot journalist remarked with unaffected surprise when discussing the effect of busing on the demographics of a certain northern city: "We were surprised that the white population voted with their feet [i.e., they just left the city and the busing jurisdiction] !"
Well, of course they did you moron! What the hell did you expect? Who the hell are you people to tell everyone else what to do and how to live?
Just as a PS: it should be no surprise that the above-referenced "journalist" lived his entire life in one of the nearly-all-white-suburbs of that nawthurn city on a hill. Still does.
Of course he did, hypocrisy being one of the primary tenets of liberalism.
The federal government's motto: If It Ain't Broke, Fix It Til It Is.
The race problem is actually a White problem. The solution is to flood all & only White countries with massive third-world immigration and forced assimilation. Diversity & multiculturalism are code words for White Genocide.
Absolutely, Silky. I've always thought the bromide "opposites attract" to be the most insipid piece of conventional "wisdom" to ever come down the pike. Men and women are the exception to the rule, of course.
I don't think of men and women as opposites. I think of them as components of a whole, complementary components.
Gorgeous, Silky! We just need to relax and respect sense of humor. Laws and enforcement are killing willingness.
Perfectly said.
Silky you make too much sense. You can legislate behavior but you cannot force camraderie. It is either there or not. I love all people until they injure me but I choose who to let in to my circle. I think this is true of blacks and whites .
By trying to force comraderie, the government destroys it. I suspect that the government's true goal is to keep blacks and whites at each others' throats. It's easier to pick our pockets when we're preoccupied.
We have to meet each other as individuals; I do not represent the entire white race and you do not represent every person of color. I do not like "joiners" -- judge me as an individual. Nuff said.
Much of what Mr. Reed writes is true. The only way to resolve this is true equality before the law. Affirmative action, set asides, quotas, forced integration and the whole racial entitlement system must go. Before there was forced integration, there was forced segregation. There should be no laws forcing people together or apart. Public facilities should be open to all. Private facilities are another matter. Let people pick their own friends, employees and associates. If people want to hire with their own affirmative action programs let them. If people want to hire only their kind let them. I personally believe people are a lot more tolerant then is put out. The dumbing down of the schools has had a huge negative effect. Blacks are not expected to achieve. Black family life has deteriorated markedly in the last 50 years. In my opinion the white family is headed in the same direction. When they took moral training out of the schools and turned it over to Unplanned Parenthood it was the start of the present collapse.
Actually, cops still have good eyes and know which race is more likely to commit crime. Discrimination against whites is more of a corporate and government job issue. Incompetent minorities are put into positions of power (so their bosses can feel good about themselves), and then drive their institution into the ground. The US auto industry is a perfect example, before forced integration and affirmative action, the US made the best cars in the world. Now, not so much.
Hollywood supplies the media backdrop with the OBPS (Obligatory Black Police Supervisor) in each and every movie or TV show. Trial judges are invariably women, invariably non-white. James Earl Jones once played the head of the CIA. Danny Glover must have been unavailable.
In business, 11 out of 13 happy Wal Mart shoppers in photos at one entrance in one town were minorities. It's one big, unrelenting fairy tale, except when a black was brought in to run the Whirlpool factory in Newton, Iowa. That very real incompetent ran that very real operation into the ground after hiring his buddies.
And the work ethic is no better in the Caribbean. I won't call it purely racial, but it sure does seem like a cultural dysfunction.
So, your explanation for dysfunction is culture? Do you honestly believe that culture is created in a vacuum? Culture is a product of given people. Blacks in american are little different from blacks in africa. Blacks in america, thought they have a higher average i.q. than their co-racialists in the motherland, share the same culture norms, values which do not create but only destroy. Planned Parenthood? Abortion has kept the black plague in check.
good point -- self-organization by free association will sort the matter out naturally, without legislative coercion.
The Left won't allow it they'll still have "disparate impact" as a weapon. Basically any disparity between the races even if it's unintentional is cause for redress. That's how tests become "racist". Disparate impact has to go.
Or until such time as American whites and American blacks make common cause to protect the country from the "immigrant" hordes.
Not that it wouldn't be traditional for Americans to go down fighting each other instead of the real enemy.
No, not in my opinion.
Why do you believe blacks are making common cause with Mexicans?
Precisely. However, in the unfortunate event of a race war I'm not sure which way the Mexicans would swing.
Yes. And they could decide based upon a rational calculation of which side would be most likely to "win." That being the case, I would expect them to side, by and large, with whites, but I'm not extremely confident in that prediction.
ironically, or perhaps tragically, the blacks do not understand that they are being replaced "in situ" by a perceived less dangerous group -- completely intentionally. that they howl together is largely an independent (but related) learned response. a third party will (the elite and their institutions) both encourage their cooperation and then alternately inflame matters of differece -- as IT sees fit.
actually, this also affects lower middle class whites as well, since their economic expectations must be crushed and they must be replaced as well.
I disagree. The "grievance" industry is outside the context of "racial amity" that Fred Reed is discussing.
What you point out as the "personal level, e.g. gang war" is most definitely not a conflict that takes place on a personal level, sorry. Gang wars are social-cultural activities, which is exactly what Reed is pointing at.
Blacks don't like Mexicans and "immigrants" because they compete for those jobs (to the extent that they compete for any job) that are available to their skill-set. Furthermore, we're talking about a future set of contingencies where whites no longer provide the level of welfare programs that blacks rely upon for subsistence. At that point in time, your basic working Mexican becomes the worst enemy of the parasitic role of blacks.
But gangs are a mere subset of the cultures, and in the case of Mexicans, do not reflect the broader culture. The average Mexican has little in common with the average Mexican gang-banger and is not about to assume common cause with him. He'd be more likely to link arms with el gringo, particularly if he felt that whites were the winning side.
Potato, potahto.
I don't want any Mexicans here at all, so I sure as hell don't feel any need to make common cause with them.
Get them out.
The Mexicans who are here as citizens are not Mexicans. They're Americans. And their attitudes toward whites are far more friendly than yours toward them. They're assimilating just fine. And vice-versa.
Good lord, what absurd bullsh!t. If they are illegal aliens, they are Mexicans. If they are American citizens, they're Americans. If they are Americans, they have assimilated.
The rest of your nonsense is accusation based in ignorance.
Of course it is:
History of Mexican-Black solidarity - Workers World
No time for more at the moment. But have a look:
www.howfirmafoundation.net
Hope you had a fine and merry Christmas!
? Isn't the greatest actual racial conflict in America occurring between blacks and hispanics in border states--inside and outside of their prisons?
Marcus Garvey had the right idea with his "Back to africa" movement. What he had wrong was the idea blacks could pull off such an operation (Black Star Line -Ships). But we Whites can do it. The time is right now. It's for the good of blacks too. They will be much better off and happier back in Africa. I'm sure they'll be welcomed back by their black bretheran with open arms.
Another good article by Fred Reed.
Semper Fi...
Some form of piecemeal repatriation may well be a good idea, but given current political conditions, it is indescribably beyond impossible.
America has about as many Africans in it as Uganda or Kenya and more than countries like Sudan, Mozambique and Ghana...good luck transporting an entire large third world country, guys.
Aristotle said that friends are friends because they are alike in virtue. I reckon that friends are friends because they are alike in many other ways, too. In my observations of people around the world I noticed what Fred did: people like to hang out with other people who are like themselves. This should not be regarded as a crime.
I've also noticed that here in the USA it's not good enough to let whites and blacks who actually like each other to hang out with each other. No. Whites and blacks must have their relationships enforced by law. I think that skews things automatically. It creates an unnatural tension that would not exist if we just let association with one another be free rather than a game of political score keeping.
Oh well. As harmless Fred's opinion is, and as harmless as my comment here is, in the modern USA we have breeched an unforgivable taboo.