We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
And which Sanders insider was working at the Democratic National Headquarters that over saw the democratic voting statistics ??? You see, people don't even know what Seth Rich's job description was....and how he was shot in the back with three small bullets in a tight shot group that can only be fired by a small automatic weapon, not used by criminals.
Is this Seth who was then murdered? I believe it is. Where is the justice for him?
Obfuscation through compliant media reporting serves to sow suspicion and misinformation to a point where understanding is compromised. Mainstream media, through its consolidated controlled ownership Is no longer truly independent or reliable.
Amb Murray never said the insider was a sanders supporter. Where's the proof? Seth was one and was murdered for it.
Actually it was the Clinton Crime Family cooperating with the Russians.
It makes no sense for the CCF to be working with the Russians as Killary is a blood thirsty hawk who is constantly Russia and Putin bashing and has madeit clear, she -- at the bidding of the global war pusher$ and profiteer$ -- is eager for confrontation.
Only if you believe the charade. If you take even 5 minutes to do some research, you'll discover that Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Vladimir Putin are all personal friends of each other.
“I said, ‘You know, Mr. Prime Minister, we actually have some things in common. We both want to protect wildlife, and I know how committed you are to protecting the tiger,’” Clinton reportedly told the audience. “I mean, all of a sudden, he sat up straight and his eyes got big and he goes, ‘You care about the tiger? I said, ‘I care about the tiger, I care about the elephant, I care about the rhinoceros, I care about the whale.’”
Then, she said, Putin invited her to what she described as his “private inner sanctum.”
I must admit that it has been confusing trying to figure out the motives of Putin in last few yrs. Seems he would like to continue the reign of a facile stooge that is Obama. However, it seems that Hillary with her promotion of the "Arab Spring", the destabilization of Libya, support of the Muslim Brotherhood candidate in Egypt (which the people had he good sense to throw out), the fiasco in Syria, support of the Ukraine & George Soros charities operating in eastern Europe, all made for a bowl of toxic stew that was head for his country which he believed would lead to instability for Russia. .
‘Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.’
Now how does he know that?
Julian Assange .
I was with you until you got to the "liberals don't think with logic". That is as bad as "Trump supporters are a basket of deplorables". If you have to call names, or degrade people, you have just lost the argument.
Actually, not you haven't lost the argument. Also, Calling someone "deplorable" is worse than saying they don't think with logic.
I, for one, could think of a lot more things to say about them (besides they don't think with logic) that may not be very nice (by your standards), but they are also true, lol.
And by the way, you cant reason with liberals (most, not all) because they are NOT reasonable. They do not tell the truth. They refuse to see facts. They are blind to reality.
And those are all true things about them. They spew out blatant lies. How can you even have a civil discourse if they lie and refuse to acknowledge true facts?
The Progressive " Logic " produced present day Detroit from most affluent city in the world , to Venezuela , not to mention the 260 million unarmed people killed in 70 years of 20th. century . Blaming this on lack of ' Logic" is deplorable !
Liberalism Symbolism over Substance.
BUT ITS A FACT!
I won't say EVERY one ... but ALMOST all.
Thats what MAKES them liberals. Most just believe what someone else says, and do NOT research facts and think with an open mind. Most just do NOT. Sad, but true.
They are blind to truth and will fight tooth and nail for their point/agenda -but have no substance. You cannot reason with them or have an opposing view to theirs, as they just resort to outright lies ... then to name calling etc., and much worse.
Not all -but MOST all. Very few do not follow this pattern ...
mmm, i'd say ALL.. the few that don't are not liberal, they just don't realize it.... i haven't met one that i could have an intelligent conversation with, and that includes many members of my own family...
D4Dr is the defective gene .Progressive thought is the symptom ! This manifest's as mass murder,poverty,and Totalitarian rule .
Mike, why do you keep calling the corporate, bank$ter, fascist, war pushing, Russian bashing media, "Left Wing" when, in fact, if they were traditional left wingers, theywould have been pushing for Jill Stein to take the presidency or at the very least, would have crucified and exposed ultra hawk Clinton and her cabal (no "left wingers" onmost mega issues) for her dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders who is far more to the leftthan pro-Monsanto, pro-fracking etc. Clinton ever was!!!
The media is run by elite puppeteer$ who use dis-info, propaganda and divide and conquer terms like "left" and "right" to control the sheeple. You're on the money regarding the media machine lying, distorting, censoring etc., but way off when you constantly and incorrectly label the media "left wing."
My guess as to ‘who done it’ was the CIA. Remember a little history in that the CIA set up and brought down governments and leaders for decades in the last century, if those leaders didn’t follow the ‘advice’ of the U.S. government. Then in the 1990’sthe CIA director at that time decided that he wanted to be president. Afterall, didn’t he and his agency set up leaders in other countries and make thempresident? So the director of the CIA (George Bush SR) got himself elected aspresident, and there followed another President name Bill Clinton, who had beenexceptionally 'good friends' with the CIA in providing assistance with theCIA's heroin/drug smuggling into the USA. Do you remember the MENA incident?This helped to provide the means for funding to the CIA's 'off the books'finances through illegal drug sales. The CIA did not forget its friends.AMAZINGLY, after Bush SR, Bill Clinton managed to get elected as president. Andafter the Clinton years, AMAZINGLY, the former CIA director's SON, Georgie JR got elected. Why is it so difficult for people to make the connection between the CIA and who gets to be president in this country? Remember, the CIA had experience for decades in setting up people in political office all around the world in variouscountries, and also in taking such leaders down (assassination or the everfamous 'mysterious heart attack') if those people did not comply with theCIA/America's wishes. How much more difficult would it be for the CIA to put aperson in power as president of the USA? Look through the history ofthe last 40 years and you might learn how easy it has been. If you want to lookfor the sources of any alleged 'election hacks', then you do not need to go anyfurther than the CIA itself as the perpetrators, in my humble opinion.
Kennedy said he dismantle CIA , and throw them to the wind . Could this have produced what followed in Dallas for the world to see?
I read this today on AOL( definitely a democratic company) and laughed my ass off. Such BS the media puts out.
so, you believe that Brietbart news is accurate? i'm not sure i want to take your vitamins. !!
Read,study U.S. Constitution using Dictionary contemporary with it . Then judge .
I appreciate the revelation about Craig Murray being a source, but are you saying that the CIA is lying when they conclude that the Russians were hacking the DNC? The Russians have done similar things in the elections in other countries and the BREXIT vote, so isn't it a stretch to call the CIA's conclusion a "delusional conspiracy theory"?
The CIA only ever lies. It's their stock in trade. It's what they do, and they do it well. Why would anyone believe anything the CIA said about anything? Have you read much U.S. history?
The question is whether the Russians were involved. We may suspect the CIA is lying, but the evidence has not yet been examined and most is still secret. I'll wait until the Senate Intelligence Committee gets the evidence out. What exactly did CrowdStrike see that pointed to Russians?
just keep on waiting........
Oh, and another web of lies the DemonRats have spun...nothing new really - yawn.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is saying that he has sources inside the intelligence community that are saying that the general disgust over Hillary's careless disregard for national security in her use of a private server (that had no real security) prompted one or more of them to LEAK (not hack - no HACKING EVER WENT ON) to Wikileaks in order to derail her campaign and to get back at her for putting US assets at risk. Sounds like a very reasonable conclusion. It is quite possible that multiple people leaked information for multiple reasons (Bernie folks, DNC folks, Intelligence folks). Hillary has been stabbing people in the back and walking all over them for her entire career. Plenty would want to see her finally fail.
I can't wait for December 19th, so we can all watch Donald Trump WIN AGAIN!!!
Like Trump said many months ago...
“We’re going to win so much, you’re going to be so sick and tired of winning, you’re going to come to me and go ‘Please, please, we can’t win anymore.’ You’ve heard this one. You’ll say ‘Please, Mr. President, we beg you sir, we don’t want to win anymore. It’s too much. It’s not fair to everybody else. And I’m going to say ‘I’m sorry, but we’re going to keep winning, winning, winning.”
The more the liberals complain, the more they prove Trump correct. LMAO
Very plausible this is the truth
He may be telling the truth, but if this was a claim the the Russians were helping Hilary then you'd be know doubt pointing out he's very close to wikeaks who wouldn't want you to know they got the information from Russia
This petition is simple. https://wh.gov/it4Nw
Electors are not some special class of people with special rights or privileges; they are AMERICAN CITIZENS just like the rest of us. They were chosen to represent us on December 19, 2016 by reading our votes into the record.
Whereas; Forty electors have demanded a special intelligence briefing regarding alleged evidence that the Russians (or anyone else) may have influenced our 2016 elections.
If these citizens should get any special briefing, THE BRIEFING SHOULD BE SIMULTANEOUSLY OPEN TO THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PUBLIC! - NO SECRET BRIEFINGS!
WE ALL have a right to hear the allegations at the same time.
WE ALL have a right to examine any evidence that may or may not affect our elections.
WE DEMAND THE SAME RIGHT TO HEAR THE ALLEGATIONS AND CLAIMS OF THE CIA, BEFORE OUR VOTES ARE COUNTED.
If it is not possible to present evidence and.or information to the entire citizenry, THEN NO CITIZEN has any right to special, closed-door briefings.
Also, they should hear counter arguments, not just orchestrated BS from the white house and Hillary. Let them hear from others who know the charges against Russia and Trump are completely bogus.
I put your link to the petition on G+. I suggest everyone do the same! I signed because I believe that we should all be able to hear that briefing since it is OUR votes that they are playing with!
From latest reports, it would appear that the intelligence agencies are NOT prepared to put forward any representation to attend the requested briefing. This 'briefing' isn't going to happen.
They got nothin'!
Demoncrats are nothing but liars and criminals!
But What Does It Matter?! I literally am rich and unprosecuted.
Patience, the prosecution and Super Max sentence is in the mail Killary.