We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.

chuckinva • 7 years ago

The awful truth about Barack Obama and his Progressive cabal is that they need Americans to die for their cause. How much of their evil tactics were responsible for the death of those 5 officers? We need to fear the current Democrats more than we do ISIS.

As long as African-Americans allow themselves to be useful idiots to their Democratic masters, they will never take their rightful seat at America's bountiful table. Democrats keep them at the child's table. Race relations can only improve when Black start to take responsibility for their own lives.

jamus King • 7 years ago

Its all about gun control, Unleash violence across the whole country then sweep in, take away guns and save the day. Thats the Obama plan. How many Americans die is irrelevant to this fascist Government. We have seen the exact same thing in Nazi Germany and the Stalin takeover of Russia. Obama is running a play from an old Communist playbook.

Buckospal • 7 years ago

As long as Hillary's antics remain cloistered from the daily news cycle, the BLM and Black Panthers minions have fulfilled their obligation to the socialist party!

Old_Jimmy1929 • 7 years ago

"You're a racist" . . . the indefensible accusation. BLM even considers "All Lives Matter" a racist comment. Once so "declared", by definition you're a racist if you use the phrase . . . funny how that all works.

Anscotman2 • 7 years ago

Classic Alinsky tactics....accuse your opponent of what you are saying or are doing.

TheRealJohnDoeNJ • 7 years ago

You know what? I can live with all of the vile rhetoric because it makes all the malcontents easy to identify. Contrary to popular opinion, the test of free speech is not when someone says something with which one agrees. The test of free speech is when someone says something with which one does not agree. This is a concept that the intolerant malcontents of American society fail to realize or accept.

However, when the vile rhetoric turns to overt explicit threats of violence or death, especially with racial overtones like we are seeing more frequently, and inspires society's malcontents to follow through on threats, then all bets are off, and it's time to be a good scout. Be prepared. Turn up the radar sensitivity. Be alert. And be ready to repel physical violence against one's self by any means necessary. Personally, I'm putting in extra time at the range, among other preparations.

I consider myself to be a member of the peaceful, civil, tolerant society, and I don't relish the thought of being ready to escalate in the presence of escalation. On the flip side, I don't relish the thought of being an injured or deceased victim.

jamus King • 7 years ago

i agree, I am so happy i was in the Military and can see thing others may miss. Every human being that wants to protect his or her family in this insane country must take classes in self protection. how to look at every situation with a tactical solution in mind. (if I'm in a restaurant and someone walks in and has a gun. ) Where do i go, How do I protect myself, you need to know that before he walks in the door. You don't have to live in fear, you just have to be mindful, you always want to look for the tactical advantage when you pick your table or seat. How fast can I get off a round from where I'm sitting. Who is walking behind me, is there anybody between the cars hiding. Always be mindful and you can survive what is going to get worse under the Democrats. But never be afraid, they prey on the fearful.

Old_Jimmy1929 • 7 years ago

Well said, I hate the vitriolic speech, regardless of the "side" taken on these forums. I know some is the result of "he said it first", but sometimes it's better to "kill the with kindness". But like you John, I'm not one to sit back and have my rights stepped on, too many good folks died for those rights.

Aistis Vaicekauskas • 7 years ago

I like what you said.

Rudy's Hair Dye • 7 years ago

Trump = Stormfront

BillClintonsShorts17 • 7 years ago

Mentira Roja, Maestro.

Rudy's Hair Dye • 7 years ago

The right-wing had never condemed separatists groups like Bundy's para military brigade, who have stated that their intent is to overthrow the United States government. In fact, two members of Bundy's militia assignated two Vegas cops but the conservatives said nothing.

oldguy52 • 7 years ago

You lie!

The Millers were not members of Bundy's group and were in fact escorted from the property when they showed up. But just like a lefty, you just keep repeating the same lies...

Rudy's Hair Dye • 7 years ago

Your just reciting talking points so Bundy can clain plausible deniabilty. The Millers were active members of Bundy's right-wing para military brigade.

oldguy52 • 7 years ago

Sure, lie some more.

BillClintonsShorts17 • 7 years ago

More lies. The assassins of the Vegas cops were expelled by Bundy's group.

Fal Phil • 7 years ago

"Assignated". Is that "assassinated with a Sig"?

IM Gumby • 7 years ago

I wonder why no one has noted that now the BLM movement is adding the narrative that this is part of an "All Lives Matter" statement.
(The article shows a picture of a group of white protesters w signs that read "Black Lives Matter" and one that says "Black Lives Matter Too"

Does anyone remember how the BLM movement was angered when a politician said that "All Lives Matter"?

If the BLM campaign was honest, they would be marching in the streets of Chicago to protest the under policing of the gang invested areas west and south of the city. They would be protesting the 400+ murders and shootings. The reason they are not is that the gangs don't have money for the lawyers and activist leaders to get rich off of... and of course the more obvious reason... the gang members are likely to shoot them as a response.

TraderJo • 7 years ago

An accusation of one being racist is the first cry of the Left when they can’t argue rationally. And therefore, the term has lost much of its meaning.

Doesn’t matter whether one is black, white, green or striped, it’s their ACTIONS that count. And blocking freeways, chanting, throwing rocks and bottles as the Black LIES Matter crowd is wont to do does not advance their message. They are showing themselves to be the thugs that they are.

So the next time someone calls you a racist for disagreeing with them, just smile and wear the badge proudly.

rachewl • 7 years ago

Exactly.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

Although I disagree about BLM having anything to do with cop killing, I agree the democrats are stirring up racial strife for political gain to this countries detriment.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

Right, a lone wolf. Domestic terror, right?
Does anyone dispute that these lone wolfs are "inspired" by one group or another?

San Bernadino shooters - inspired by ISIS.
Orlando shooter - inspired by ISIS.
Dylan Roof - inspired by White Supremacy.

Question : Who inspired the Dallas cop killer?
Answer : #BlackLivesMatter/Obama.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

Isis is a U.S. Israeli proxy army. The rest of those incidents you mentioned were DHS active shooter drills where no one died or was injured.

I believe that if the Dallas cops were indeed killed, someone other than Micah X a lone gunman carried out the crime.

Black lives matter is not responsible for micah, the same way the Trump is not responsible for the Klan.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

Has trump ever spoke positively about the clan?
Do I need to continue explaining all of the things wrong with your statements...?

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

Has BLM leadership supported police killings? They condemned the Dallas shootings. A few people making vile statements can't condemn a whole movement.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

You mean like "Systemic Racism" and "White Privilege" doesn't condemn everyone? Isn't that what is going on here?

P.S. "Pig's in a blanket...fry 'em like bacon!"
P.P.S. "Detroit police arrested four men for allegedly threatening on Facebook to kill police officers, ... One of the men reportedly posted: “All lives can't matter until black lives matter."
P.P.S. You know I could go on an on with that...so stop deflecting.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

Systematic racism is a reality that should in no way condemn any individual, the fact you have a problem with the term means you deny mistreatment of you're fellow citizens because it makes you uncomfortable. When I'm not allowed to have feeling about mistreatment I perceive that's the worst form of racism.

I despise the term white privilege because it dumbs down society, and most of the people using it are complete idiots. The term is divisive and would only be accurate in a situation where one black person received different treatment in an identical / similar situation. Johnny Depp / Jose Reyes for example.

I can point to police who engage in acts of violence as opposed to words, that doesn't mean all cops evil. Cops have been caught beating and torturing innocent people, I cant blame them all for the acts of a few.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

I flatly deny there is systemic racism.
Would you like to know why?

"When I'm not allowed to have feeling about mistreatment I perceive that's the worst form of racism."

This is the entire issue.

If the entire basis for your "feelings" is false, then your feelings are false. You can have them, but they are not real, and no one should care.

You feel some are mistreated based solely on statistics that show a disproportionate amount of blacks are killed by police.

I can show you the same statistics that show a disproportionate amount of men are killed compared to women.

That is either discrimination, and active targeting of MEN - or PEOPLE actually behave differently.

#MensLivesMatter. ?
(Just as ridiculous as #BlackLivesMatter)

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

You flatly deny the Earth is round.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/...

Carrington Spensor • 7 years ago

That is your argument?

Who should the 'War on Drugs' have targeted? People in upper middle class suburbs that weren't using drugs? Have you ever taken a class in Law Enforcement? When a crime has been committed and eyewitnesses and/or a video camera show that the person doing it was white, 6'3" tall, male, with short red hair - should the overworked police with limited resources be rounding up short Asian females with long black hair for questioning to show that they're conducting a balanced investigation?

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

The US government smuggled in the drugs.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

I don't click troll links. Care to summarize?
After you are done - care to tell me how Men are not being actively targeted and discriminated against by the police. (Men are killed 100x more than women by the police after all!!!)

SEXISM!!!

#MensLivesMatter!!!!
(please understand I am now making fun of you)

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

How could a white person deny that systematic racism exist?

BillClintonsShorts17 • 7 years ago

Easy. I deny that systematic racism exists in the U.S.

There you go chum.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

We agree on guns at least.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

I deny that black on white crime exist. I like watching Colin Flaherty videos. Dallas was a reasonable response to the attitude you display!

BillClintonsShorts17 • 7 years ago

Rick, 'systematic' racism would involve what we used to have in the south: A segregated society, segregated by law. We haven't got that anymore. The only racism to be found in the 'system' is that practiced by affirmative action supporters and the like. We have lots of racism, to be sure, both black and white. But it is individual, not 'systemic'.

spunknik • 7 years ago

It exists. It's called Affirmative Action. It's the reason that a lower-qualified black applicant will be chosen for college admission over my Asian/Caucasian children.

Emmanuel Goldstein • 7 years ago

Usually, we speak in standard English. That's the way I'd explain it.

You wouldn't understand....

biilyjoe • 7 years ago

BlackLIESblabber.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

You deny systematic racism? Why even address an issue that doesn't concern you?

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

The problem with that statement is that it doesn't apply to me. I never said "disproportionate amounts of blacks are killed by police" I know for a fact blacks are mistreated by the criminal justice system, mortgage lenders and several other systems in place.

I think police brutality is not a racial issue and BLM is making a mistake by only focusing on black deaths, it turns off others with common cause. Not to mention the inclusion of Trayvon and Brown.

How can you deny my reality? In NYC blacks are denied fourth amendment rights based on race. Police chiefs across the country have admitted to racial profiling, a federal crime. Why do white people take offense at the very existence of racism? You didn't create the oppression, so why defend people who engage in it.

Carrington Spensor • 7 years ago

Appreciate your comments. They are circular, will never be met to your satisfaction, and illustrate the situation perfectly.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

When most of the violent crimes that are committed in the USA are committed by minorities (Democrats usually, as well, I would add) profiling is necessary.

The sub-prime lending argument you make was directed at poor people with bad credit (thus, sub-prime). It just so happens that many of them were black, just like police shootings. They, and you made it a racial issue (again, just like police shootings), when it was never intended to happen that way. Black people made it about them, just like (again) police shootings, when it is not.

False Narratives abound with you!

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

Profiling is a crime so it can't be necessary.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

Really? Please use the google and search for the words "Criminal Profiling".

You have a right to your own opinions,
but you do not have a right to your own facts.

Your ignorance is showing.

Rick Manigault • 7 years ago

To my surprise, racial profiling is not banned by federal law.

In my state it's banned.

Coinspring • 7 years ago

It might also surprise you that most people are not a bigoted as you.

biilyjoe • 7 years ago

****

Carrington Spensor • 7 years ago

"The term is divisive and would only be accurate in a situation where one black person received different treatment in an identical / similar situation. Johnny Depp / Jose Reyes for example."

Huh?

First off, Depp is white, Reyes is Hispanic. Next, Depp is an independent working in film. His attorneys are working with his ex-wife's attorney to reach a financial settlement in lieu of her pressing charges against him. Reyes is a professional baseball player and union member, that has broken terms of the agreement between the baseball players union and baseball ownership, and was suspended by the league due to it.

These 2 cases are under different sorts of relationships, as are most cases.