can anyone explain me the table(possibility cases) I don't understand !! Thanks !!

i heared from someone or coaching inst.... if statemnt and colclusion having same line den dat conclusion dosnt follow...
statment
all A is B

con-

1.some B is A
2. All A is B

what wil b d corrct ases

some institute say only 1 wil follow.... conclusion 2 is same as givn in statement so dosnt follow..

is this right sir?

plss reply hmmmm

both follows !!

analytical method se possiblity solve karne ka tariqa hain keya koi... i solv syllow with rules...nd m gd in that..bt possibly creats problm....
but aftr learng dis concept...m very happy now :)
thnks a ton

Please help with the case in which statements given with "some A are not B, Some B are not C, All C are D"

Statement..all rivers are states

Cnclusn...1.some states being rivers is a possibility.
2. All states being rivres is a possibility
3.some rivers are states.
4.all rivers being states is a possibility.

Kindly see d qustion and answer because isse bhut problems dur hone waali h....plzz answer

may be 1, 2 and 3 follow.?

as per d rules described if statement in some formate and desired conclsn is al den posibility yes...
and if in statemnt dere is no relation and desired conclusion is all/some ..den possibilty yes...

ans???

In concept 9, between A and C, can " no C is A" be the possible conclusion?

All keys are locks.

Some locks are not buttons.

All locks are clocks.

Conclusions:

I. Some keys are not buttons.

II. Some keys are buttons.

III Some clocks are not buttons.

IV. Some clocks are buttons

all keys are locks- iska matlab sara key lock hai (matlab lock key ke barabar ya zada bhi ho sakta hai lakin key lock ke andar he rahega)
some locks are not buttons-iska matlab hai kuch lock button nahi hai(yaha pe do funda hai ya to kuch lock button hain ya fir koi bhi lock button nahi hai)
all lock are clock- iska matlab pura lock clock ke andar

i. true
ii.false
iii. and iv me either or hoga

plz tell.. neither nor cases .......how to judge whether neither nor or none of these wil b d ans...

hey,,, plz tell wht is desired meaning in possibility table shown above........

Statement
All A is B

Conclusion
All A being B is a possibility

Its true only? According to me the conclusion is asking whether it's correct or not.. so its there in the statement itself so my answer is follows.. but some persons goon argument with me that if statement itself proves then possibility won't follows in the conclusion so it doesn't follows its hard to accept can you say which is correct.

if "possibility" is given in the conclusion it shows chances but we are damn sure that it is true......so doesn't follow :))
for example if i say.... all apples are red.....conclusion:_all apples are red is a possilblity......wrong.......we know it already....sure about that....

Are you sure.. because the question asked is whether yes or no, U need to Say yes if the conclusion is true.. as u said all Apple's are red.. it's true in your statement itself then its follows right.. May I know where u learnt this..

can't say actually i check this some books say follow some say not....confusing...:(

STATEMENT:-SOME PEOPPLE ARE INNOCENT ; ALL MEN ARE INNOCENT ; ALL PEOPLE ARE WEALTHY.

CONCLUSION:- 1:-NO PEOPLE IS A MAN IS A POSSIBLITY

2:-SOME WEALTHY WHICH ARE PEOPLE ARE NECESSARILY INNOCENT

Please cilear me the concept of the above question

both are true

i am having problem in last section as per the table ->norelation +all/some =yes ?????? how .

if u don't get the table..think like two circles overlap each other then ..

Some Mangoes are Apples

All Apples Being Mangoes is a Possibility .......both follows...as some can be taken as ALL

so,

ALL Mangoes are Apples or all apples are mangoes are true as they overlaps

Thank u sir
Really helpful

Sir please explain this question

Statements
A) some rings are chains
B) All chains are bangles
C) All bracelets are bangles
D) some bangles are pendants
conclusion
I) some rings are bangles
II) some chains are pendants
III) some bracelets are rings
IV) no pendant is ring

Option
I) none follows
II) Only I follows
III) only II & III follow
Iv) only IV follows
V) none of these

Kindly let me know the solution

only i and iii follows

v) none of these

because 1,3 and 4 are follows

Sir SSC CGL paper 2013 reasoning Q.37 proves your theory of Concept 5 as wrong.
Q 37. Statement
(I) All cities are towns.
(II) some cities are villages.
Conclusion
I) All villages are towns.
II) No village is a town.
III) some villages are towns.
Dear sir, according to your concept 5 i choose conclusion III) as both I n II don't follow but m shocked that answer is none none follow as it is specified by your concept 5 that some A is C but here it proves wrong so, please i need you to examine this. I'll be thankful to you.

only iii follows

Arunsathyan pl help me solve this.
As per the concept given above answer should be only conclusion 1 follows but as per the answer none follows plz tell.

9> only ii follows
10> only i follows

You guys are amazing.......makes us to hope to get a job

Sir please give some explanation of on of the difficult n time consuming topics such as input-output .

I must say you have done a fabulous job by sharing this valuable knowledge. I am able to solve all the syllog questions by these concepts. Thanks a ton..
There is one doubt regarding the possibility case.
When "ALL" is desired and "NO" or "Some not" is given as per the statements then possibility will be correct or not?
I hope you will clear it asap with the same ease.

Can u explain me the table (possibility cases) I don't understand !! Thanks !!

Thnkkk u sir...
I learned a lottt through this unit......

All keys are locks
some locks are not buttons
all locks are clocks

CONLUSION:
Some keys are not buttons
some keys are buttons
some clocks are not buttons
some clocks are buttons. plz explain this

i and either iii or iv

conclusion 3 and either 1 or 2 follow.

sir if possbl seating arrangement k liye bi kch trics bta do spclly in outward-inward typ Q's...simpl Q solve ho jate h bt ye both dirctn k nh hote aur mostly po level m yh aate h...:):)plzzzzArunsathyan Ramamoorthy

thanxx a lot sir..it is useful...:) :)

please give possible conclusions for this concept

possible conclusions:

b/w A & B : All A are B. Some A are B. Some B are A.

b/w B & C : No B is C. No C is B. Some B are not C. Some C are not B.

b/w C & D : All D are C. Some D are C. Some C are D.

b/w A & E : Some E are A. Some A are E.

b/w A & C : No A is C. Some A are not C.

b/w A & D : No A is D. Some A are not D.

b/w B & D :No D is B. Some D are not B.

b/w B & E : Some E are B. Some B are E.

b/w C & E : Some E are not C.

b/w D & E : Some E are not D.

thanks sir for solving problem of my previous post and please give solution for this also in this problem your syllogism made easy concepts are not applicable please explain it.
st:no leaves are fruit
all flowers are fruits
all buds are leaves
some plants are flowers
con:
1-no flower is bud
2-some plants are not fruits
3-some plants are not leaves
4-some leaves are not buds

i and iii follow

why 2 conclusion doesn't follow !! can u explain !! Thanks !!

1 and 3 follow

Please give PDF of every math topic

please solve
st:all pens are pencils
some pens are erasers
all papers are books
all erasers are books
con:
1-some pencils are books
2-some books are pens
3-no paper is pen
4-some erasers are papers

Conclusion 1 and 2 Follows.
Conclusion 3 is Negative. All statements are positive. So it does not follow.
Conclusion 4 does not follows. Thr is no connection between Erasers and Papers.

thanx

Gr8 work man..
i ws nt good at dis section bt it helps me alot..